Without Conscience: The Disturbing World of the Psychopaths Among Us

The book explores the idea that psychopathy may have a biological or genetic basis. What evidence does Hare provide to support this claim, and what are the implications for understanding and managing psychopathy?

How does the author explain the high prevalence of psychopaths in positions of power and influence? What messages does he therefore convey about privilege?

What are some of the ethical considerations raised by Hare’s work on psychopathy, particularly regarding the labeling and treatment of individuals as psychopaths? Consider the implications for children, criminal justice, mental health, and society.

How does Without Conscience address the general public’s common misconceptions about psychopathy? Discuss the difference between the popular image of psychopaths and the reality described in Hare’s book.

Hare describes the psychopath as a “social predator.” How does Hare use literary elements of the horror genre in the text?

Hare argues that psychopathy is underdiagnosed and misunderstood. How does he use the text to address this issue?

Discuss the relationship between psychopathy and recidivism as explored by Hare. What perspectives does he offer about the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in handling psychopathic offenders?

Hare reveals that the criminal justice system considers psychopaths legally sane. How does his argument in Without Conscience challenge traditional notions of free will and moral responsibility?