logo

54 pages 1 hour read

Jas Hammonds

We Deserve Monuments

Fiction | Novel | YA | Published in 2022

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Life in Cities Versus Small Towns

Content Warning: This section of the guide references racism, colorism, anti-gay bias, anti-fat bias, emotional abuse, and terminal illness.

In the early chapters of We Deserve Monuments, Avery dreads moving from Washington DC to small-town Bardell County, Georgia. She views the Confederate Flag hanging from a local bar and bullet holes on the town’s welcome sign as confirmation of her expectations about Bardell: that, as a small town in the Deep South, it must be unilaterally socially and politically conservative. As a Black, pansexual teenager, Avery assumes that Bardell will be unwelcoming. Her understanding of setting as contributing to political atmosphere—which, for liberal and justice-minded Avery, equates to potential happiness in a location—starts off as binary and based on stereotypes. For Avery, a city in the North must be liberal and accepting, something Avery equates with being “good.” Similarly, a small town in the South must be conservative and unaccepting, which Avery mentally frames as “bad.” The longer she spends in Bardell, however, the more Avery embraces that this paradigm is insufficient. Avery learns that it is the individuals within her city or town who determine her relationship with the place and give her a sense of home.  

While in Bardell, Avery becomes closer with Jade and Simone who, despite their conflict in the latter half of the book, she finds more open-minded than her friends in DC, often encouraging Avery to embrace her truest self. By contrast, she begins to understand the racism she faced from her friends in DC, however veiled it may have been. The novel does not present this as an inversion, however; the legacy of Jim Crow laws is more visible to Avery in Bardell than in DC, as are emblems of slavery. Jade’s family lives, for example, at a plantation. Yet the novel’s overall argument is not that one place is inherently better than the other. Instead, they each have their pros and cons. Avery is able to find people she loves and respects in Bardell, thereby defining the town as a place she can call home.  

The novel suggests, moreover, that there is a benefit to experiencing life in both rural and urban communities, as evidenced by Jade and Simone (both Bardell natives) choosing to travel to big cities after they graduate high school. Avery’s friends are thus implied to be sent on a journey analogous to Avery’s, seeking to understand the relationship between setting and self. Before coming to Bardell, Avery could not comprehend what her vision of herself might look like outside a large metropolis. By contrast, Jade and Simone have never been given a chance to see themselves in any other place than Bardell. Avery, the last interlude quickly notes, ends up seeking even more rural surroundings, as she works in national forests. Ultimately, the novel thus suggests that the best part about different locations is their difference. The pros and cons of different settings are not absolute but reflect rather how a character can come to understand themselves by living in that place.

Aggregate Burdens of Racism

When Tallulah tells the story of her conflict with Letty in the drugstore, she cannot believe that Letty became upset over something so small as a single dollar. For Letty, however, “It’s not about the fucking dollar and it never has been (195). Similarly, Avery’s anger at Kelsi for her mimicking a Black rapper is compounded by the pain of hiding her grief at exhibits depicting anti-Black violence, which she feels she must hide as her friends will not understand. These scenes both depict the novel’s presentation of the violence of racism as something that does not exclusively exist in singular moments. Instead, Hammonds offers, it is the aggregate burden of operating under persistently racist conditions that contributes significantly to Black people’s pain in a white supremacist society.

While the novel does suggest that white people (including those who work at anti-racism, such as Jade) cannot ever fully understand the lived pain of racism, it does not argue that the white offenders in these supposedly minor instances are ignorant of the larger histories behind their actions. Instead, the text frames the knowledge of this history of privilege as weaponized. Kelsi’s accusations that Avery is being dramatic are echoed in Jade’s later comments; the repetition of this metric suggests that accusing Black people of overreacting is a central tool in perpetuating white supremacist aggressions. This is particularly evident in the incident between Tallulah and Letty. When Tallulah complains that Letty would not yield over a mere dollar even though Tallulah was pregnant, she wields expectations of white privilege and sentimental notions of white motherhood to bolster her case. Her true anger is not about the soda; it’s that a Black woman, like Letty, did not give in to the demands of a white woman. She shows that she can use white supremacist ideology to regain control of the situation; she complains to Letty’s manager about the woman’s “attitude,” and has her fired. Tallulah ignores the ironic reversal: She feels that Letty overreacted to a minor request, yet reacted with extreme vitriol to what was, to Tallulah, a minor inconvenience.

Thus, the burdens and pain of racism pile even higher for the characters in Hammonds’s novel. Letty’s anger is not about the dollar; it’s about Tallulah marrying into the Oliver family, who killed her husband. It’s about a lifetime of being expected to give in to white people’s demands and being punished with violence and cruelty whenever she refuses. When she refuses in this instance, she is again met with a further burden. She loses her job and her income. The burdens, the novel implies, continue to pile up, in a way that is unavoidable unless the entire system of anti-Black racism is undone.

Intergenerational Trauma and Privilege

When Jade, Simone, and Avery become close friends, they do not know the long histories that intertwine their families. Over the course of the text, they unravel this painful history and how it has affected Simone and Avery’s families very differently from the way it has impacted Jade’s family. The delineation of these effects is due to race, racism, and white supremacy. The Olivers have benefitted from enslaved and coerced Black labor, leaving them rich and convinced of their own power in the community. They have no reason to expect retribution for their cruel and violent behavior and attitudes, either; they have historically never faced retribution, including for the murder of Avery’s grandfather. Their privilege, the text presents, changes over time, but it does not diminish or disappear.

The Harding-Andersons and Coles, meanwhile, deal with more painful consequences of the interactions between the families. Ray’s death leads Letty into a longstanding state of grief, in which she misuses alcohol and is neglectful and emotionally abusive of her daughter, Zora, whom she cannot forgive for looking like Ray, Letty’s lost love. Letty’s pain (and the fear of retribution that a socially transgressive Black girl might face in a town led by a family with overt connections to the Ku Klux Klan) leads her to reject Zora and Carole’s romantic relationship. This anti-gay bias separates Zora and Carole. Zora flees Bardell, returning only when her mother is dying, and Carole becomes entrenched in her own anti-gay bias, which the novel implies is at least in part due to the pain of her past. These burdens are subsequently passed down to Simone and Avery, who are initially forbidden to be in a relationship. Simone suffers from her mother’s anti-gay bias, while Avery struggles to understand how to live in a world in which her grandfather’s murderers still walk free.

Though the pain of this history is disproportionately felt by Black families, the novel does not suggest that this suffering unilaterally belongs to the Harding-Andersons and the Coles. Rather, the revelation late in the novel that Letty killed Amelia, a retributive act designed to cause the maximum pain possible to the people who killed Ray, suggests that violence affects everyone who lives in an unjust society. Pain begets pain, the novel suggests, even as it emphasizes that Letty’s act of violence is extremely minor—and perhaps, it implies, even justified—compared to the incomprehensible violence of centuries of anti-Black racism.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text