39 pages • 1 hour read
Barbara KingsolverA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Willa is one of the book’s two protagonists. Her story takes place during the early 21st century (perhaps around the year 2016). The practical partner in her relationship with her husband, Iano, Willa is anxious, uncertain about her own and her family’s future, and longs for stability amid the upheaval in her life. She’s also a concerned and involved parent in her adult children’s lives, stepping in to help Zeke in the aftermath of Helene’s death, taking care of her infant grandson, and reflecting with concern on her daughter Tig’s struggles to find a partner and adult identity.
Willa acts as a counterpart to Thatcher, the story’s other protagonist, but she is not a foil for him because the two share many characteristics—such as first-hand knowledge of financial insecurity and introspection on the social issues of their respective eras. Instead of using the two characters as foils, Kingsolver uses their similarities to create a sense of cohesion between her two storylines. Because Willa and Thatcher think about, react to, and grapple with similar things such as difficult family members, the role of science and reason in public discourse, and social status, Kingsolver’s exploration of these themes does not lose momentum as the story switches from one setting to the other. Willa’s story, however, has most of the material associated with the mother–child relationship theme and lets Kingsolver explore how families cope in a time of personal and social change, while Thatcher’s focuses more on his own individual growth and journey toward self-understanding.
Thatcher Greenwood is the story’s 19th-century protagonist. Sensitive, philosophical, and principled, he divides the world into “investigators,” like himself and Mary, and the “sweeteners,” those who lack intellectual curiosity and accept commonplace ideas (41). Thatcher came from a background of poverty and gained a scientific education by working for a surgeon during the American Civil War, which occurred about 10 years before the story begins. Thatcher is also an amateur botanist, and this knowledge helps him understand and admire Mary. He has a habit of characterizing people by the plants he thinks they most resemble: “Polly was a hollyhock, cheerful, forthright, tallest bloom in the garden. Rose of course was a rose” (37). His characterization of himself in plant form at the beginning of his story reflects a self-assessment of sensitivity and weakness: “Greenwood, the sapling. Too easily bent” (39).
Thatcher is somewhat of a misfit in provincial Vineland and wishes that he and Rose still lived in Boston, which he associates with his own upward advancement and improvement beyond his impoverished origins: “[…] for Thatcher, Boston was everything: emancipation from rural childhood drudgery, his apprenticeship and education, the world of ideas, his heartiest friendships. All his best days were lived in Boston” (44). (In this sense of displacement, he is again like Willa, who longs for her old home in Virginia when she moves to Vineland.) Because of his success in bettering himself, Thatcher also has a sense of pride in his self-sufficiency, and Rose’s condescension dismays him because it feels as if he is being reduced to a degrading condition: “She’d reduced him to a child, and the whole of it appalled him, her part in this and his own. As if he were still a beginner, begging for love and purpose” (44-45). This dynamic signals deep dysfunction in the couple’s marriage and foreshadows their eventual separation.
Kingsolver devises a character arc for Thatcher that transforms him into a more independent person who is confident in his convictions, even when they are unpopular—as they are in Vineland. Unwilling to keep the peace with Rose at the expense of his own beliefs, Thatcher eventually leaves his marriage, signaling his desire to act out of integrity, not self-protection.
Mary shares some similarities with Thatcher. Like him, she is inquisitive, principled, and philosophical. Mary is a gifted, eloquent, and well-connected scientist as well, despite being self-taught. She rejects many of the tenets of conventional femininity during her time and is independent, opinionated, and self-assured. Rather than adhering to the acceptable spheres for a middle-class woman—centering around appearance, status, and the home—she is intellectually active, somewhat disheveled at times, hardy, and knowledgeable about the outdoors. She is extremely influential on Thatcher, giving him the confidence, encouragement, and camaraderie he needs to take his stance on Darwinism to Vineland’s public. Mary acts as a foil for Rose and most of the other women in the novel, although she and Polly share some characteristics that suggest that Thatcher’s sister-in-law could follow in Mary’s footsteps if she were permitted to.
Iano is Willa’s husband, and his main function in the narrative (beyond driving the plot by taking the job in New Jersey) is being a foil to Willa, since their characteristics contrast in many ways. He is lighthearted, optimistic, and generally carefree, while Willa is highly sensitive to responsibility and tends to look at things practically. As the narrator states:
Having a mother to shore up Willa had always left Iano to be the fun, sexy one who didn’t worry even about death or taxes, who brought her flowers picked from other people’s yards, who threw her pain-inflicting shoes out the car window on the way to a formal reception at the provost’s. She couldn’t expect him to be a new kind of person now. She was the crisis handler, he was the evader (12).
In other words, Iano and Willa’s spheres within their marriage are well-defined.
Iano is not just Willa’s opposite in terms of character; he also drives some of the conflict in the book as Willa is forced to grapple with problems in her role as the “responsible” partner. The narrative describes the constrictions Willa experiences as she tries to live up to her role in the marriage by stating, “Marriages tend to harden like arteries, and she and Iano were more than thirty years into this one” (12). When Willa takes it upon herself to single-handedly solve problems, she tends to struggle. When, however, she leans on her husband, as when he agrees to teach lucrative summer classes and helps Willa find an affordable apartment for them in Philadelphia, the family inches a little closer to security. In this way, Iano can be understood as a symbol of Willa’s relationships. When she trusts him, everyone thrives.
By Barbara Kingsolver