logo

47 pages 1 hour read

Joan Didion

The White Album

Nonfiction | Essay Collection | Adult | Published in 1979

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Storytelling

Didion’s famous opening sentence—“We tell ourselves stories in order to live” (8)—announces the collection’s primary theme. Ironically, or at least surprisingly, most of the essays contest typical ideas about stories. Coherent narratives and sweeping meanings make Didion uncomfortable. For most of these essays, the “we” in that first sentence precludes Didion: “I am talking here about a time when I began to doubt the premises of all the stories I had ever told myself” (8). Because Didion feels that the meaning of stories is unreliable, she doesn’t provide clearcut stories in her essays, preferring to convey imagery from which readers may draw their own conclusions and associations.

Concerning the hypothetical naked woman on the ledge, Didion notes, “I was interested only in the picture of her in my mind” (39). Didion conveys impressions and observations of her subjects. She tells what she sees in describing the Black Panthers, the film industry, or Bogotá: “I remember mainly images, indelible but difficult to connect” (173). Her book tour is mostly images: snapshots of airports, places, and mediatized information. Her profiles on James Pike and Georgia O’Keeffe mix scenes from their lives with moments from Didion’s life. They’re less of a story and more of an impressionistic patchwork of moments.

Didion’s hesitancy over storytelling involves meaning. She describes activism as “one more way of escaping the personal, masking for a while that dread of the meaningless which was man’s fate” (184). As the world is deeply personal, the construction of collective meaning makes Didion weary. Meaning is elusive, yet people need to tell themselves stories to bring meaning to their lives and actions. The Black Panthers, the feminists, the biker gangs, the Jaycees, people addicted to gambling, Dallas Beardsley, and others form stories to inject value and structure into their lives. Didion stands back and watches.

What appeals to Didion is systems, which she juxtaposes with stories. Systems contain an intrinsic meaning that preludes narrative. For example, Didion writes of the California State Water Project: “A schedule is made. The gates open and close according to schedule. The water flows south and the deliveries are made” (53). Project participants don’t have to create stories or meaning—it’s already a part of the system: Its purpose is to distribute water. Systems like the building of shopping malls, the breeding of orchids, and the lives of soldiers and lifeguards likewise preclude the need for storytelling and creating a narrative about meaning. The soldiers at Schofield don’t have to think about their day, and their “narcoleptic movements” (134) enchant Didion. They have clear, achievable goals. Storytelling and meaning might have goals, but those goals are often unrealistic or unrealizable.

The Construction and Subversion of Identity

Stories and meaning give a person an identity. The stories and meanings attached to Huey Newton give him his identity as a revolutionary Black Panther leader, yet Didion subverts his identity. She sees Newton as an “alchemy of issues” (23). Identity turns into symbolism, but Newton isn’t a symbol: He’s a person, so identities, like stories and meaning, are something of a fabrication—they’re made up.

Throughout the essays, Didion deflates the identities people create for themselves. Hollywood figures think of themselves as good people, but Didion presents them as self-important and simplistic for “perceiving social life as a problem to be solved by the good will of individuals” (80). Feminists create identities for themselves that center on constant oppression, but Didion deconstructs those identities and argues that they’re not oppressed but immature and unrealistic. In the essay “Notes Toward a Dreampolitik,” Didion presents four types of identities: the preacher, the biker gangs, the aspiring movie star, and people addicted to gambling. Each is a construct—a mishmash of ideals and conflicts.

The identities that appeal to Didion are less coherent and identifiable. James Pike fascinates her as “a man who moved through life believing that he was entitled to forget it and start over” (50). Identity didn’t confine Pike. He could always make a new identity when he felt like it. Similarly, O’Keeffe represents a laudable identity. She defies conventional identities for artists and women. She’s neither a conformist nor a fabrication: “She is simply hard, a straight shooter, a woman clean of received wisdom and open to what she sees” (113).

The identity Didion creates for O’Keeffe has much in common with the identity Didion forms for herself as a woman separate from norms and knowledge. She doesn’t read The New York Times but listens to call-in shows. She’s an individual and doesn’t feel the pressure to perpetuate common talking points or beliefs. Didion feels “radically separated from most of the ideas that seem to interest other people” (118). The isolation, though it sounds negative, is beneficial: It gives Didion her unique character. Didion’s world gives her several identities: “I was named godmother to children. I was named lecturer and panelist, colloquist and conferee. I was even named, in 1968, a Los Angeles Times ‘Woman of the Year’” (9). However, Didion doesn’t identify with any of these labels. Like O’Keeffe and Pike, Didion maintains an elusive identity. She doesn’t restrict herself to a social movement or group.

In most cases, Didion is like a vessel. Similar to O’Keeffe, she’s open to what she sees. Both O’Keeffe and Didion are women, and “woman” is an identity that Didion accepts. Didion states, “I am a thirty-four-year-old woman with long straight hair and an old bikini bathing suit and bad nerves” (119-20). However, Didion subverts her identity as a woman by defining womanhood as “that sense of living one’s deepest life underwater, that dark involvement with blood and birth and death” (103). The identity Didion picks for herself is mysterious and mostly unintelligible.

The Hazy Distinction Among Reality, Media, and Consumerism

Didion’s world revolves around media: newspapers, radio, poems, books, and movies. On her book tour, Didion describes America as “an invisible grid of image and opinion and electronic impulse” (159). America is a mediatized nation, a pulsating network of pictures and discourse. The media one consumes reflects one’s reality and identity. When Didion notes that she listens to call-in shows instead of reading The New York Times, she implies that the former leaves her with a different view of the world and herself. Didion distinguishes among different types of media, and call-in shows sound less serious and thoughtful than the prestigious The New York Times. However, the hazy boundaries between media, consumption, and reality make it difficult to assess what would happen if Didion got news from a “serious” media outlet instead of a sensationalized one.

At times, media enables Didion to stay in touch with reality or world events. It’s a means to discover what’s happening in spaces that she’s not a part of—parts that don’t qualify as her reality. On the book tour, Didion’s reality is mostly a series of studios, first-class flights, and hotels with room service. The call-in shows and airport screens inform her about other realities, but the information doesn’t directly impact her and her daughter. In Hawaii, too, the relationships among media, consumption, and reality are hazy. The newspapers arrive late in Hawaii, so the hotel guests don’t immediately learn about Robert Kennedy’s death. They talk about John F. Kennedy’s brother as if he’s still alive because in their reality, he hasn’t been shot—he’s not dying in a hospital. Whether Kennedy’s alive or dead, however, it’s unclear how it directly impacts the lives of the people in the hotel.

In some essays, Didion offers a critical depiction of the media as dictating people’s reality. The people in Hollywood view social problems as a movie, TV compels Nancy Reagan to pick flowers, Huey Newton becomes a series of marketable quotations, and the San Francisco State tumult turns into a performance “playing it out in time for the six o’clock news” (34). In Bogotá, American media dominates: Political figures seem more concerned about the lack of American films about the Vietnam War than about their immediate situation—their reality. Death, too, submits to the media when a New York newspaper photographer talks about how he must capture a person jumping to their death in action to get into the media.

Media and consumerism don’t control Didion’s world. She focuses on it and acknowledges its near omnipresence, but her independent identity frees her from its clutches: “I was supposed to have a script, and had mislaid it. I was supposed to hear cues, and no longer did” (9). Didion isn’t free of media, but she’s not a vessel for its myriad narratives and scripts. She doesn’t hear its directives, so she records what she sees, and her views don’t provide discernable solutions for differentiating among media, reality, and consumption.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text