logo

32 pages 1 hour read

Roald Dahl

The Way Up To Heaven

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1954

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Mrs. Foster

Content Warning: This section of the guide contains descriptions and references to abuse and coercive control, accident, and death.

Mrs. Foster is the protagonist of the story. Her thoughts and feelings are the only ones that the narrator presents as known. It is through Mrs. Foster that the main thrust of the story’s action and ethical questioning is enacted. Her role in the story is to exemplify the potential roles and dilemmas of a woman in an unhappy marriage, especially one whose husband is cruel and coercive.

The story’s focus on Mrs. Foster’s inner life creates a sense of intimacy and allegiance between her, the narrator, and the reader. The narrator’s descriptions of her character enable the story to portray her as an inherently good woman, especially one who is exceptionally patient in the face of her husband’s constant provocation. She is “loyal and obedient,” “modest,” and “good and loving” (47). The story also emphasizes Mrs. Foster’s virtue in that her “only” weakness is an “almost pathological” fear of being late: Even her potential fault is aligned with politeness and punctuality (47). Though she is an obedient, dutiful wife who has “served” her husband well, he uses her one “foible”—fear of lateness—to “torture” her (47). A model of wifely self-negation, she tries to repress her feelings, though they habitually escape in the form of an eye twitch.

Mrs. Foster’s character development is gradual through the story and is a tale of awakening personal agency and self-determination. At first, the narrator shows her acceptance of a marriage where her husband’s abuse has been normalized: “[S]he had for years refused to let herself believe that Mr. Foster would torment her” (48), with only a slight glimmer of the self-assertion that “recently she […] caught herself beginning to wonder” (48). Even in her own mind, Mrs. Foster holds herself to her husband’s controlling standards of obedience, as she has “refused to let” herself and “caught” herself in the act of these suspicions. When, that night, Mrs. Foster realizes that her husband is toying with her and will likely cause her to miss her flight, she experiences a sort of vertigo or out-of-body experience where he seems “far off” beyond a “borderline” (53). Here the story expresses Mrs. Foster’s shock and disorientation as she begins to differentiate her needs from her husband’s. Her character becomes increasingly assertive from this point.

Although Mrs. Foster again waits for Mr. Foster the next morning, she this time expresses some frustration and, when he insists on looking for the comb, she openly protests. On finding the hidden present in the car, her manner changes again: She goes to fetch him, something that at the beginning she would “never dare” to do. The point where she waits and listens at the door is a turning point in the portrayal of her character. From this point on, she is calm and decisive, a deliberate juxtaposition to her earlier anxiety. The story thus shows that Mrs. Foster’s anxiety and timidity were the result of her husband’s cruelty, manipulation, and bad temper. This change in behavior highlights her increased happiness without him and asserts her individual rights. Her evident competence without her husband proves her to be a sensible and intelligent woman, revealing the signs of his masculine assistance—escorting her to the airport, ordering the car—to be acts of control, not help.

From the point of the key in the door, Mrs. Foster’s internal life becomes much opaquer to the narrator. The narrator described Mrs. Foster’s innermost thoughts and feelings at the beginning but now observes her outwardly only. This way, Dahl creates mystery around Mrs. Foster’s possible act of omission and makes the story enact her increasing autonomy as a person.

Mr. Foster

In contrast to Mrs. Foster, the narrator does not reveal the inner thoughts and emotions of Mr. Foster but describes his consistently cruel behavior. The narrator makes open conjectures and judgments about Mr. Foster throughout: He may “have a right to be irritated” by Mrs. Foster’s fear of lateness, but he “could have had no excuse for increasing her misery” (47). The narrator also states that “it is hard to believe he wasn’t purposely inflicting a nasty private little torture” on Mrs. Foster (47). He is described as “unreasonable” and “guilty.” The story also reveals that he has purposely “disciplined” his wife not to challenge him, and Mrs. Foster is “terrified” that he will “eventually manage to prevent her” from making her journey (48). While Mrs. Foster develops a twitch as her inner emotions force their way out, Mr. Foster has an analytical head tilt and jerky movements that make his cruel intentions apparent as he assesses the consequences of his action and inaction in given situations. All of this characterization supports a reading of him as a deliberately unkind and controlling husband.

Multiple events imply Mr. Foster’s enjoyment in torturing his wife, creating a pattern of evidence for his emotional abuse of her. When Mr. Foster speaks to his wife politely, he is controlling and passive aggressive, such as when he tells her the car is ordered for her but will drop him at the club first. He is this way on the first journey to the airport, taunting her by repeating that she is likely to miss her flight due to fog when they both know it is because he has purposely prolonged their departure. Mr. Foster feigns polite conversation in order to torment Mrs. Foster and test her self-control as a wife. Very often he is downright rude, and he loses his temper several times in the short story: When Mrs. Foster telephones from the airport, he says, “Don’t be so stupid, woman” (51). He is “furious” later when she argues with him about the comb. He consistently fails to display the self-control and patience he expects from his wife, demonstrating a misogynistic double standard and controlling behavior.

The comb hidden by Mr. Foster is a turning point in the portrayal of his character, as it shows with certainty that he has been deliberately tormenting his wife, finding ways to prevent her from catching her flight. When Mrs. Foster finds the hidden comb, she and the reader gain certain evidence of his deliberate cruelty. This evidence helps to frame Mrs. Foster’s subsequent act of omission, and the reader’s willingness to judge or forgive her for her decision. Mr. Foster is compared to a squirrel and a goat at different points in the story while he is stalling his wife’s departure, highlighting the inhumanity of how he treats her. The story makes little or no suggestion that the reader should feel sorry for Mr. Foster but asks, rather, whether his behavior has led to his death. He has deliberately made his wife wish herself free of him and may therefore be responsible when she decides not to rescue him. The extent of his responsibility is an essential part of the story’s open-ended ethical conundrum.

The Servants

The Foster's servants are background characters but have a significant role in this short story. They are referred to mostly by their occupations, apart from the butler, Walker. The characters help to indicate the story’s social context, as their presence reinforces the Fosters’ status as part of the formal upper class. As a wealthy couple, Mr. and Mrs. Foster have a large house that requires servants to manage, and living in style helps to indicate their status and respectability.

The servant characters are far more than mere ciphers, however. The house servants, especially Walker, are witnesses to the behavior of Mr. and Mrs. Foster, and their presence encourages the reader to judge the couple and to wonder what the servants think. Mrs. Foster’s continual questioning of Walker about the time is expressive of her anxiety and his stereotypically butler-like answers supply a comic pathos. The servants—like the reader—are observers, but they have been close witnesses long before the story’s opening, and their reactions are therefore a guide for the reader on how to judge the situation. Mrs. Foster has Walker’s discreet allegiance: He answers her “kindly” and has proactively prompted Mr. Foster to be on time, something that Mrs. Foster is afraid to do. Walker’s kindness makes him a foil to Mr. Foster, and his support of her is a means for the story to signal that Mrs. Foster is in the right.

The presence and absence of the servants is an important plot point. It is crucial to the plot that the servants are sent away from the house for the six-week duration. This is Mr. Foster’s choice, and his preference to move into his club subtly suggests that he will take the opportunity of his wife’s absence to behave in ways that he would not wish his own servants to see. This adds irony to the fact that the empty house gives Mrs. Foster the opportunity to commit her act of omission.

The only servant character who witnesses this moment is the “Irish chauffeur.” This character is only briefly featured in the story, but during notable timing at the turning point at which Mrs. Foster leaves her husband in the house and—as is later revealed—trapped in the elevator. He is described as having a “small rebellious Irish mouth” (57), an allusion to continued Irish resistance against British colonial rule in Ireland during the 1950s. This is an interesting detail, as it is ostensibly unnecessary to the story: Perhaps it is intended to signal that the chauffeur is likely to have sympathy for the oppressed Mrs. Foster and to dislike the authoritarian Mr. Foster and—potentially—any authorities who might inquire into the cause of his death. There is a marked shift in narrative perspective here, as the chauffeur is the only minor character whose thoughts and feelings are expressed. Briefly, Mrs. Foster is seen through the chauffeur’s eyes, highlighting his role as a witness to her act of omission and providing a method for the story’s wider shift away from Mrs. Foster’s inner experience from this point on. The memorable characterization of the chauffeur adds jeopardy to Mrs. Foster’s situation at the story’s ambiguous end, as he is the only person who could potentially give evidence that she listened at the door before driving on.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text