44 pages • 1 hour read
Todd StrasserA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The dissenting voice who represents the value of the free press, Laurie Saunders is the story’s “hero.” She symbolizes the fight for freedom of speech, as well as a willingness to defy fascism and injustice regardless of the potential cost. At first, Laurie seems a composite of most popular teen girls at school. She’s attractive and popular, sporting “an almost perpetual smile” (1), and dates the football team’s running back. Although unafraid of confrontation, Laurie finds unnecessary competition tedious, as evident in her exasperation with her best friend, Amy.
Amy incorrectly describes Laurie as an entitled princess who values feeling special above all else. On the contrary, Laurie is thoughtful, humble, and values curiosity, kindness, and individuality. The documentary about the Nazis bothers everyone, but it lingers with Laurie in more profound ways than with others. Laurie represents the answer to the question of every student who asked how the German populace could allow the Nazis to take over: They didn’t question and confront the spread of fascism with the same courage as Laurie does.
Additionally, Laurie is the narrative’s conscience. For some, the collapse of (and even scorn for) individuality leads to a sense of belonging and purpose. For Laurie, the loss of individuality is horrifying. She watches peers whose idiosyncrasies were endearing and unique relinquish their identity to march in lockstep with The Wave. Laurie is unwilling, or unable, to follow in unthinking faith, a trait she shares with her mother.
Her devotion to the Grapevine is likewise uncharacteristic of the other students in the novel. Before The Wave, she doesn’t even get the enthusiastic buy-in from her writers that she’d like. She understands the power of the free press and takes a brave stand by issuing a special anti-Wave edition of the newspaper. She provides an example of how Nazi ideology forced people to take a stand that affected their relationships with their families and friends, even their marriages. When she challenges The Wave in front of David, she doesn’t think it will end their relationship. However, when he tells her to find a new, smarter boyfriend, she doesn’t retract her concerns. She’s sad but refuses to act out of pure emotion when she knows better. Ultimately, Laurie exemplifies questioning authority in a firm, respectful way and the possibility of stopping problems before they grow too large.
The history teacher responsible for the experiment The Wave, Ben Ross is idealistic, obsessive, and, during his experiment, prone to naivete. The early descriptions of Ben paint him as creative, approachable, and unusually capable of engaging his students. His colleagues are “[d]ivided in their feelings towards him” (5) and consider him “[y]oung, naive, and overzealous” (5), with a penchant for spectacle and unconventional teaching methods. His wife, Christy, tolerates his obsessions because she admires his passion and because his interests are relatively harmless. However, she admits to herself, “It was almost frightening, the way he lost himself in each new adventure” (27). This is quirky when it’s bridge or history, but less so when Ben is attempting to replicate Nazi Germany in school.
His students describe his enthusiasm as “contagious,” meaning “that he was charismatic. He could get through to them” (5). This makes Ben a potentially dangerous character. If he can get through to students, which not all teachers can, he has the responsibility to treat his contagious enthusiasm and focus with care. Ben has a charisma often associated with teachers who interact easily with students and whom students often consider cool. Likewise, uncanny charisma is often associated with dictators, making them capable of easily drawing people to follow their cause. At its best, charisma is disarming, useful, and magnetic, as Ben illustrates in the novel’s opening section. At its worst, charisma can transform a leader with good intentions into a ruthless figure who finds power too seductive to relinquish.
Unlike Hitler, Ben doesn’t set out to gain power or to crush his enemies, and he eventually regains the self-awareness to see that even he’s not immune to the flattery and obedience that power grants him. Rather than persist with The Wave or risk his reputation and career, he chooses to use himself as an example of how easily corruption can begin. When he tells the students that they would have made good Nazis, he doesn’t exempt himself: By implication, as their leader, he might have made a good dictator. For most of the novel, Ben exemplifies the well-meaning leadership figure who finds himself gradually seduced by power. He never intends to enjoy the experiment but finds himself enjoying the admiration of his followers, whom he used to think of as students.
Ultimately, Ben has the humility to realize that the experiment has gotten away from him. His narrative arc takes him from a quirky, cool teacher who wants to reach his students through unconventional means, to someone who enjoys the feeling of needing a bodyguard, and back again to his former humility. Luckily, his experiment is a success, and implies that Ben’s experiment will serve him and his students well in the future. Ben learns from his mistakes, helping his students do the same, rather than experiencing the fate of history’s most ruthless dictators: death, exile, or prison.
Laurie’s boyfriend and a member of the football team, David Collins is her foil regarding his attitude toward the experiment. When David is introduced, he reacts to the documentary by flatly stating that the Holocaust could never happen again. For most of the novel, he’s a one-dimensional version of a familiar character, the high school jock. After seeing the documentary, the author describes him as “torn between waiting for his girlfriend and filling his growling stomach. The stomach won” (13). He’s presented as humorous, slightly oblivious, and generally harmless.
However, David’s character serves important functions in the story: He shows how an ideology can split romantic partners who end up on opposite sides of a movement. He’s a reminder that people who loved each other faced impossible questions when they confronted the spread of Nazism, and their feelings and ultimate allegiances didn’t always align. David introduces The Wave to the football team, naively thinking that bravado and declarations of strength will make up for their lack of talent and actual strength. Ultimately, this proves a foolish approach because the team loses badly to a team that greatly overmatches them athletically, and their allegiance to The Wave and its salutes and slogans has no impact on their performance on the field.
In addition, David represents the possibility for redemption: that recovery from indoctrination is possible for someone who sees the error of their zealotry. Not until he physically assaults Laurie does David understand how extreme his behavior has become. He never would have thought himself capable of harming her, but in hindsight, the trajectory was inevitable: “He wondered how on earth he could have done something so stupid. What could have made him want to hurt the girl, the one he really still loved” (114).
Embodying another high school archetype, the overweight, bullied outcast, is Robert Billings. Robert’s older brother, Jeff, is an accomplished athlete and was a standout student at the school both athletically and academically. However, Robert can never live up to his brother’s example and is aimless and apathetic about his life. During the documentary about the Nazis, Robert falls asleep. Ben, who shows great affection for his students, thinks, “The Billings boy was a real problem” (6). When he confronts Robert about his grades, Ben realizes he has no leverage when Robert says he doesn’t care and claims that Ben’s attempts to help him “wouldn’t do any good anyway” (15). Even Laurie describes Robert to her mother as “the class creep” (49), without giving a reason for why she’d refer to him in such a disparaging way.
The Wave provides Robert with his first feelings of belonging. The structure and equality of the group transforms David. He doesn’t use his status in The Wave to elevate himself but does fulfill his duties passionately, even becoming Ben’s bodyguard. When Ben asks him why he’d want to do that, he says, “Nobody makes jokes about me anymore. I feel like I’m part of something special” (83). Shortly after the formation of The Wave, David insists that Robert sit with them at lunch. Robert, notoriously disheveled and unkempt, soon dresses sharply and tucks in his shirts. His new purpose transforms him into a model Wave member, making him a potentially dangerous. Robert represents the formation of a true believer, a dangerous zealot who believes in prioritizing and protecting the group at all costs. He says that “Laurie Sanders is a threat” and “must be stopped” (104). This is characteristic of the hostile rhetoric and intolerance that permeates authoritarian regimes. Robert is easy to indoctrinate precisely because he was aimless and alone.
By the end of the novel, Robert is the most militaristic of The Wave’s members, and when The Wave ends, he’s the most heartbroken. Ben hears him sobbing and sees him “with tears running down his face” (138). He thinks about Robert as “the only one who really stood to lose in this whole thing” (138). However, Robert receives an optimistic ending: Ben sees Robert’s sadness as a chance to bond and to recommit to his future. When he says “there are some things I think we should talk about” (138), it’s likely that Ben has a new idea that will serve this new version of Robert better than The Wave did.
By Todd Strasser