46 pages • 1 hour read
David GrannA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Despite his injury, Cheap oversaw the evacuation of the crew from the sinking ship. He insisted on following the rule that the captain be the last to leave a sinking ship, even if it endangers his life. Some of the crew, including the boatswain King and the carpenter’s mate Mitchell, refused to leave the ship and instead drank the ship’s supply of liquor, “preferring, it seemed, to die in one last orgy of revelry” (101). Bulkeley found that most of the ship’s logbooks had been deliberately destroyed, apparently to protect the crew’s leadership from possible prosecution back in Britain.
It was determined that, out of the original crew of 250, 145 survived (103). They had no idea on which island they were marooned. They took refuge in a building described as a “wigwam” (104), but they could find no inhabitants. Cheap tried to organize a rescue of the crewmen who had refused to leave the ship. They finally came, wearing expensive clothing stolen from the belongings of the senior officers. Cheap publicly struck King, who as the boatswain was held responsible for lack of discipline among the survivors.
On the island, the survivors could not find anything to eat, even fish in the sea. They were also afraid of being attacked by natives, so they stayed close to shore. To survive, they depended on supplies from the wreckage and on mussels and snails from the beach. Most of the crew, including Bulkeley, had to sleep and live outside.
Bulkeley managed to make shelter out of part of the ship. Meanwhile, discontent grew against Cheap’s command. The service of volunteer and forcibly enlisted sailors ended after a ship was decommissioned. Therefore, some argued that, since the Wager had sunk, they were under no legal obligation to obey Cheap or the other senior officers.
Fear grew as members of the crew, including Byron, became convinced they were sharing the land with a large, dangerous beast. Also, it was discovered that the terrain made it too difficult to travel further inland. All the survivors knew was that they were on an island otherwise uninhabited by humans not far from the South American mainland. From the survey of the island conducted by Byron from the top of a mountain, there “seemed to be no escape” (112).
The survivors were starving. In 1945, the Minnesota Starvation Experiment found that people who experienced starvation became moody, depressed, and more prone to violence and theft. Cheap still tried to impose a strict order. He planned to “carve out an outpost in this wilderness, planting the seed of the British Empire” (114). Bulkeley and others were sent off on a boat to investigate the ruins of the Wager for supplies. They managed to recover some liquor and wine, food, tools, and clothing, among other items. The recovery of supplies, especially food, soothed discontent among the survivors. It helped that the survivors found they could also get nutrients from seaweed.
Still, though, “Bulkeley bristled at all the rules and regulations” that Cheap enforced (116). Bulkeley engaged in a lot of activities for improving life on the island, including designing separate quarters within the shelter. Other survivors began building their own tents and huts and devised a method of collecting rain in empty barrels. They renamed a nearby mountain summit as Mount Misery and their island as Wager Island.
Mitchell formed a gang of discontents who “roved about the island with their long beards and hollowed eyes, demanding more liquor and threatening those who opposed them” (122). Byron suspected that Mitchell’s gang even killed one of the survivors in order to steal the items they claimed from the shipwreck.
That winter, three canoes carrying Indigenous men arrived at Wager Island. They were of the Kawésqar people, who lived migratory lives in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego: “Given the impossible terrain, they spent much of their time in canoes and survived almost exclusively off marine resources” (124). Europeans at the time thought the Kawésqar and other peoples were cannibals, but there is no evidence that this was the case. They were so well-adapted to the cold climate that NASA scientists later studied their methods.
These Kawésqar individuals had probably never encountered Europeans before, but they had heard reports of how the Spanish brutalized Indigenous populations to the north. When Ferdinand Magellan became the first European to reach Patagonia, he took two young Kawésqar individuals prisoner. However, the Kawésqar people began to help the sailors, supplying them with sea urchins and other food. Mitchell’s gang members were seducing the Kawésqar women and planned to steal their canoes, which made the Kawésqar people leave Wager Island.
Without the food supplied by the Kawésqar people, food supplies were again running low. Sailors even took, killed, and ate a dog Byron had adopted, despite Byron’s protests. Still, he was so hungry he ate some of the dog too. Mitchell killed other survivors to steal their share of supplies. Cheap ordered a strict watch be kept over the camp’s supplies. Three survivors were caught and arrested. They were condemned to be whipped over the course of three days and then banished to a small islet with few supplies. Even so, the thefts continued.
Cheap increasingly distrusted Bulkeley, who “was constantly holding meetings in his makeshift hotel and forming alliances, building his little empire, as if he were the monarch of the island” (140). When a midshipman named Henry Cozens refused to move a casket of peas, Cheap struck him with his cane and had him imprisoned. Cheap released him from imprisonment. Later, Cozens started an argument over rations. Cheap then shot him in the head.
Even though Cheap represented the British aristocracy and the British Navy’s senior officer corps, his leadership skills were being increasingly undermined. Bulkeley, who came from a lower-class background and was a low-ranking member of the British Navy, showed better or at least more practical leadership qualities than Cheap. He organized the development of an effective shelter for all the survivors and became a representative of many of the survivors in discussions with Cheap.
At the same time, other survivors completely defied Cheap’s authority and the polite and civilized norms of British society by robbing supplies from other survivors and even committing murder. On Wager Island, the “shipwreck had laid waste to the old hierarchies” (133). Despite Cheap’s efforts to create a system for imposing justice on thieves, his goal of creating an “outpost” of the British Empire was doomed (114). In fact, Cheap himself committed several acts of violence, the worst of which was shooting one of his own men. British culture and the authority of the empire’s leaders were not enough to preserve order and adherence to the hierarchy of authority within the navy.
On Wager Island, Bulkeley began chronicling his and the other survivors’ experiences. Brann argues this was a deliberate strategy. Bulkeley’s goal was to create a well-organized catalogue of eyewitness evidence to deal with the possibility that when they returned to Britain, they would be brought to trial for mutiny or would need to provide evidence against Captain Cheap. This is an example of The Importance of Stories: Bulkeley was trying to preemptively take control of the narrative. Although he started writing in a journal for his own gratification, on Wager Island, Bulkeley deliberately sought to make his accounts truthful and detailed (120).
The stowaways encountered an Indigenous population, the Kawésqar. Grann presents this as an example of colonialism’s negative impact. Even though the Kawésqar people had adapted to survive in the rough environment of Patagonia, the British still thought of themselves as superior to Indigenous Americans.
Indigenous populations like the Kawésqar have been subjected to violence by Europeans. For example, in the 19th century several Kawésqar individuals were forced into a human zoo in Paris (126). At its heart, Grann explores how colonialism presents another narrative about the so-called innate superiority of European civilization.
By David Grann