logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Michael Lewis

The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2016

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapter 8Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 8 Summary: “Going Viral”

This chapter focuses on Canadian doctor Donald Redelmeier, whose own work was largely influenced by reading Danny and Amos’s work. In fact, Redelmeier had read their first paper when he was only 17, but the ideas had stuck with him. When he became a doctor, he was concerned with the amount of flawed decision making in the medical field. As Lewis writes, “Redelmeier was never completely certain about anything, and he didn’t see why anybody else should be, either” (217). When he looked to diagnose a patient, he wanted to ensure his judgments were sound, that his mechanisms for decision making were not clouded by biases that might lead to systematic errors. Redelmeier was also seeing the consequences of risky, flawed decision making in the patients he was treating. After seeing a 21-year-old go brain dead after an avoidable motorcycle accident, Redelmeier “was newly struck by the inability of human beings to judge risks, even when their misjudgment might kill them” (225).

If Redelmeier were to make a difference in the world, he might just do it by focusing his attention on the best possible framework for decision making, which he had learned from Danny and Amos’s work. Redelmeier would later collaborate with the pair on a paper, when they all were working at Stanford University. He even published a paper with Amos titled “Discrepancy Between Medical Decisions for Individual Patients and for Groups,” in which they argued that doctors’ treatments often differed when tending an individual versus a group. The implications were significant for the medical community, and Redelmeier and Amos kept working together, mostly when Danny was working at the University of British Columbia.

The chapter ends with Redelmeier’s ruminations on how his work with Amos essentially changed his life. After this collaboration, he knew what he wanted: “to use data to find true patterns in human behavior, to replace the false ones that governed people’s lives and, often, their deaths” (236).

Chapter 8 Analysis

Lewis’s explication of how Donald Redelmeier was so deeply affected by Danny and especially Amos illustrates the tangible effects that their work had on a variety of fields. If a medical doctor could benefit from their theories, couldn’t a businesswoman or a meteorologist? At the heart of Danny and Amos’s work was the simple idea that the human mind is flawed. Redelmeier did not perceive this as a self-hating proclamation of the weakness of the human mind. Rather, it was the “recognition of human error. Not its denial. Not its demonization. Just the understanding that they are a part of human nature” (223). Thus, what resonated so clearly with Redelmeier was the idea that embracing our fallibility could actually strengthen us rather than weaken us. Redelmeier believed that “error wasn’t necessarily shameful; it was merely human” (223).

Another noteworthy aspect of this chapter is the fact that Amos found in Redelmeier another collaborator other than Danny, which in hindsight may have been an early sign that their collaboration would someday end.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text