36 pages • 1 hour read
Arthur Conan DoyleA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
“The events in question occurred in the early days of my association with Holmes, when we were sharing rooms as bachelors in Baker Street. It is possible that I might have placed them upon record before, but a promise of secrecy was made at the time, from which I have only been freed during the last month by the untimely death of the lady to whom the pledge was given.”
The story’s opening establishes that Watson is recounting this particular case several years after he and Holmes lived through its events. Knowing that these events took place during the “early days” of his friendship with Holmes makes his irreproachable loyalty to the detective all the more remarkable. The introduction also demonstrates Watson’s trustworthiness because he has kept his promise to Helen Stoner and did not divulge any of the details of her case while she was alive.
“She raised her veil as she spoke, and we could see that she was indeed in a pitiable state of agitation, her face all drawn and grey, with restless frightened eyes, like those of some hunted animal. Her features and figure were those of a woman of thirty, but her hair was shot with premature grey, and her expression was weary and haggard.”
The simile that compares Helen’s eyes to those of “some hunted animal” emphasizes her terror. Helen’s prematurely grey hair testifies to the hardships that she has endured throughout her life, indicating that her sudden need for a detective is not an aberration in an otherwise tranquil existence. Her heavy black veil is part of the mourning dress that she wears in memory of her sister. Helen’s fear and grief appeal to the reader’s sympathy.
“‘Alas!’ replied our visitor, ‘the very horror of my situation lies in the fact that my fears are so vague, and my suspicions depend so entirely upon small points, which might seem trivial to another, that even he to whom of all others I have a right to look for help and advice looks upon all that I tell him about it as the fancies of a nervous woman. He does not say so, but I can read it from his soothing answers and averted eyes.’”
Percy Armitage’s patronizing behavior develops the theme of the dangers of unreciprocated love and loyalty. Helen has promised to remain faithful to him for the rest of her life, but when she needs his “help and advice,” he dismisses her as “a nervous woman.” He may think that he is behaving politely because he does not voice his skepticism, but Helen reads his disbelief plainly in his “averted eyes.”
“‘At present it is out of my power to reward you for your services, but in a month or six weeks I shall be married, with the control of my own income, and then at least you shall not find me ungrateful.’ […] ‘I can only say, madam, that I shall be happy to devote the same care to your case as I did to that of your friend. As to reward, my profession is its own reward.’”
This exchange between Helen Stoner and Holmes touches on the theme of the corrupting nature of greed. The detective gladly accepts the case despite Helen’s current inability to pay him, citing his love of his work as “its own reward.” Holmes’s disinterest in wealth makes him a foil to the insatiably greedy Dr. Grimesby Roylott.
“A series of disgraceful brawls took place, two of which ended in the police-court, until at last he became the terror of the village, and the folks would fly at his approach, for he is a man of immense strength, and absolutely uncontrollable in his anger. Last week he hurled the local blacksmith over a parapet into a stream, and it was only by paying over all the money which I could gather together that I was able to avert another public exposure.”
Helen’s account uses both direct and indirect characterization to establish Dr. Grimesby Roylott’s strength and ferocity. In direct characterization, the speaker directly describes a character. In indirect characterization, the character’s dialogue and actions reveal the character’s traits. The incident with the blacksmith connects to the theme of the decline of status and power because it reduces the family’s already shrinking finances. The doctor’s social status has likewise deteriorated. By calling him “the terror of the village,” Helen shows his sinister reputation in society.
“At first I thought that she had not recognised me, but as I bent over her she suddenly shrieked out in a voice which I shall never forget, ‘Oh, my God! Helen! It was the band! The speckled band!’ There was something else which she would fain have said, and she stabbed with her finger into the air in the direction of the doctor’s room, but a fresh convulsion seized her and choked her words.”
Julia’s puzzling last words give the story its title and its chief mystery. She identifies her killer by pointing to her stepfather’s room, but Helen misunderstands the gesture and thinks that Julia is requesting medical aid. The strange circumstances of Julia’s death set the story apart from other detective fiction. Instead of puzzling out the culprit from an array of suspects, Holmes’s task lies in uncovering the murderer’s methods.
“Holmes pushed back the frill of black lace which fringed the hand that lay upon our visitor’s knee. Five little livid spots, the marks of four fingers and a thumb, were printed upon the white wrist. ‘You have been cruelly used,’ said Holmes. The lady coloured deeply and covered over her injured wrist. ‘He is a hard man,’ she said, ‘and perhaps he hardly knows his own strength.’”
Holmes’s actions show his keen powers of observation because he notices the bruises despite Helen’s attempts to conceal them. In addition, his words show that he cares about his client rather than merely seeing her as an interesting puzzle to solve. Helen’s defense of her stepfather develops the theme of the dangers of unreciprocated love and loyalty. She tries to shield her stepfather from Holmes’s suspicion even though he is physically and psychologically abusive toward her.
“‘Don’t you dare to meddle with my affairs. I know that Miss Stoner has been here. I traced her! I am a dangerous man to fall foul of! See here.’ He stepped swiftly forward, seized the poker, and bent it into a curve with his huge brown hands. ‘See that you keep yourself out of my grip,’ he snarled, and hurling the twisted poker into the fireplace he strode out of the room.”
Dr. Roylott’s sudden intrusion marks a turning point in the action and demonstrates his physical strength and cunning. His declaration that he “traced” Helen makes Watson’s earlier comparison of Helen to a hunted animal eerily prescient. Roylott threatens Holmes with violence in his own home. In previous detective stories, the sleuths unravel cases at a safe distance from the suspects. This shows Doyle’s ability to combine elements of mystery and adventure stories in unexpected ways.
“‘He seems a very amiable person,’ said Holmes, laughing. ‘I am not quite so bulky, but if he had remained I might have shown him that my grip was not much more feeble than his own.’ As he spoke he picked up the steel poker, and with a sudden effort straightened it out again.”
Holmes’s jest that the man who threatened him with physical violence is an “amiable person” shows his wit and composure under pressure. The sarcastic barb allows him to reassert his control of events after Dr. Roylott’s startling intrusion. The restoration of the poker to its proper shape foreshadows Holmes’s power to correct the other wrongs wrought by the crooked Roylott. Holmes’s ability to bend steel with his bare hands also sets him apart from earlier detectives, such as Edgar Allan Poe’s C. Auguste Dupin, whose strengths are strictly intellectual.
“The total income, which at the time of the wife’s death was little short of £1100, is now, through the fall in agricultural prices, not more than £750. Each daughter can claim an income of £250, in case of marriage. It is evident, therefore, that if both girls had married, this beauty would have had a mere pittance, while even one of them would cripple him to a very serious extent.”
Holmes’s explanation of the inheritance’s shrinking value confirms Dr. Roylott’s motive. The suspect’s willingness to murder his stepdaughters for their money shows that greed has corrupted him completely. Holmes’s sarcasm makes another appearance here. By calling Roylott “a beauty,” he pokes fun at the doctor’s ferocious appearance and reasserts that Roylott’s attempts to intimidate him have failed.
“The building was of grey, lichen-blotched stone, with a high central portion and two curving wings, like the claws of a crab, thrown out on each side. In one of these wings the windows were broken and blocked with wooden boards, while the roof was partly caved in, a picture of ruin.”
Watson’s description of Stoke Moran contains detailed imagery that helps the reader envision the manor’s derelict state. For example, the references to color and texture in the phrase “grey, lichen-blotched stone” appeal to the senses of sight and touch. The simile comparing the building’s wings to “the claws of a crab” adds to the scene’s threatening atmosphere. In addition, the description develops the theme of the decline of power and status because the crumbling of the once proud homestead illustrates how far the Roylott family has fallen.
“‘There are one or two very singular points about this room. For example, what a fool a builder must be to open a ventilator into another room, when, with the same trouble, he might have communicated with the outside air!’ ‘That is also quite modern,’ said the lady. ‘Done about the same time as the bell-rope?’ remarked Holmes. ‘Yes, there were several little changes carried out about that time.’ ‘They seem to have been of a most interesting character—dummy bell-ropes, and ventilators which do not ventilate.”
Helen demonstrates her bravery by participating in the investigation of Julia’s room, and Holmes points out clues about Dr. Roylott’s plot. By having Holmes draw attention to these odd details, Doyle encourages his readers to ponder their possible significance before their purpose is revealed during the resolution.
“‘Do you know, Watson,’ said Holmes as we sat together in the gathering darkness, ‘I have really some scruples as to taking you to-night. There is a distinct element of danger.’ ‘Can I be of assistance?’ ‘Your presence might be invaluable.’ ‘Then I shall certainly come.’”
This conversation deepens Holmes’s and Watson’s characterization and demonstrates their importance to one another. For all his larger-than-life qualities, Holmes is neither infallible nor invulnerable. By sharing his “scruples” with Watson, he admits that he cannot guarantee his friend’s safety. The scene represents an important moment for Watson’s character development as well because he is the only one permitted to see this vulnerable side of his friend. In addition, his readiness to face danger at Holmes’s side showcases his famous loyalty.
“For half an hour I sat with straining ears. Then suddenly another sound became audible—a very gentle, soothing sound, like that of a small jet of steam escaping continually from a kettle. The instant that we heard it, Holmes sprang from the bed, struck a match, and lashed furiously with his cane at the bell-pull.”
During the story’s climax, Holmes’s actions once again bridge the gap between detective and adventurer: His intellectual powers allow him to deduce the source of the “gentle, soothing sound,” but he requires physical strength and courage to repel the snake. Light symbolizes the quest for truth at various points in the story, and the match Holmes strikes serves this purpose. Doyle builds suspense because the disoriented Watson does not know what Holmes is attacking. As a result, the speckled band’s identity remains a mystery for a few more tense paragraphs.
“Round his brow he had a peculiar yellow band, with brownish speckles […]. ‘It is a swamp adder!’ cried Holmes; ‘the deadliest snake in India. He has died within ten seconds of being bitten. Violence does, in truth, recoil upon the violent, and the schemer falls into the pit which he digs for another.’”
Following the sound of Dr. Roylott’s screams, Holmes and Watson enter his room and find a poisonous snake wrapped around his scheming head. The now deceased Dr. Roylott had sent the snake to his stepdaughter’s bed by way of the ventilator and bell-rope. When Holmes attacked the snake, it retreated and turned on its master. Holmes’s words present the solution to the mystery of the speckled band. The detective offers a sort of “moral of the story” by reflecting on the cyclical nature of violence and the poetic justice of the doctor’s death.
By Arthur Conan Doyle