54 pages • 1 hour read
Guillaume De LorrisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The protagonist and narrator of the work is named once as Guillaume de Lorris himself, the author of the first part of the work. It is unclear at best what traits he shares with the real de Lorris, as little to nothing is known about him. While he is the primary character in the work, and the center of much of the action, he is a static character with minimal internal growth. He shows the devotion, foolishness, and emotionality expected of a courtly love tale. The narrator exists as a vehicle for the rest of the story, although he also serves as the lover of the rose, or a key part of the courtly love tradition of a pair of lovers.
The narrator is indirectly characterized by his thoughts and feelings; little personal information is given about him beyond his interest in the rose and his reactions to other characters. Since this is a medieval work, however, this sort of characterization is normal: The work functions as a psychological and spiritual allegory, so the narrator’s primary purpose is to convey this internal allegorical truth to the readers as broadly as possible.
As such, the narrator’s individuality is less important than what he can represent. His knowledge, descriptions of his clothing, and his capacity to woo the rose suggest that he is from the upper class, even though his advances are rejected by many of the various allegorical characters. The narrator experiences minimal transformation throughout the work, although he does learn about the world in varying ways by interacting with the allegorical characters. He is more loyal to Love, rejects Reason, and eventually achieves the love of the rose and Fair Welcome. Since the story itself takes place within a dream, his “growth” is more likely intended to represent the broader reality of what a generalized lover experiences in pursuit of his object of interest.
Love, or Cupid in some translations, is the god of love and sexual desire from Greek and Roman mythology and the lord over the narrator. Love is a static allegorical archetype for his very name: He represents the unavoidable power of romantic and sexual desire that all those who hope to love must obey. Love’s power and goodness are often repeated throughout the text, but he shows harsher traits, such as demanding perfect loyalty from his followers and threatening those who disagree with him. At times, his descriptions overlap with the Christian God, but he is unquestionably intended to be a divine role.
Love is characterized by his personality, but he is also given an extensive physical description that depicts him as noble, divine, and powerful. Beauty is often equated to goodness within allegory, and he is described as uncommonly beautiful. He wears a chaplet, or crown, of roses, symbolizing both passion and a foreshadowing of the love interest in the poem. His garments are covered in other flowers and birds. Both symbolize beauty, but birds—particularly nightingales and parrots—also symbolize artistic beauty and social power. Birds were an important marker of success in the medieval period, as rare birds were used both as pets and as elaborate dishes. Connecting Love to birds therefore demonstrates his importance and beauty.
Fair Welcome and the rose can be grouped together, as both are treated in their own ways as love interests to the narrator—while the rose is the object of physical desire, it cannot be accessed without permission from Fair Welcome, who allegorically represents consent and interest from the woman. Their dyadic representation of the love interest in the story is an important component of the allegorical dream since every aspect of the story represents a different version of the lover’s journey. Separating the love interest into components is part of the stylistic nature of the narrative.
The rose is given no specific characterization and is a passive object. Although it is described as beautiful, and the specific parts represent a woman’s body allegorically, it functions primarily as a symbol instead of a character. Since roses were commonly associated with passion and beauty, the rose functions as a symbol for a woman’s sexuality.
Fair Welcome is described and characterized extensively, often in a stereotypically feminine way despite the fact that he is a man in the story. He is kind, gentle, and a bit naïve. His trusting nature results in his constant imprisonment throughout the story. He is beautiful and shows no faults otherwise, and he is the character the narrator desires the most, representing the need for a young man to earn a young woman’s consent prior to sexual or romantic activity.
Reason is a foil to Love, although, like him, she is a static character who allegorically represents her own name. While Love is the force of unreasonable, but often praiseworthy, passion in the text, Reason is characterized as intensely rational, practical, and dismissive of others but unfailingly wise. The narrator, however, scorns her advice due to her inability or unwillingness to see romantic love as useful or valuable.
Reason’s characterization is shaped by her physical appearance. She is described as “perfect” but average—she is neither large nor small, tall nor short, and so on, emphasizing her rationality in always being the “golden mean” of two extremes. While Love draws people to extremes, Reason expects people to be steady and even, like her own appearance.
Reason is a woman but is not described in the same way as many other female characters. While most other characters have their hair or clothing described, she is given little physical descriptors beyond her perfect symmetry. Despite this, her gender is important to her characterization: Despite her rationality, she does demand that the narrator become her servant and lover like a noblewoman might. Additionally, her willingness to say words like “testicles” without embarrassment sets her apart from the expectations of gender at the time. Her straightforwardness embarrasses and disgusts the narrator but is praised within the text, highlighting the narrator’s human foolishness.
The guardians of the rose are Rebuff, Evil Tongue, Shame, Fear, and Jealousy. Rebuff, Evil Tongue, and Jealousy are characterized as evil, harmful, and cruel, willing to hurt both Fair Welcome and the narrator to protect the purity and innocence of the rose. Shame and Fear are not evil but are easily controlled, afraid of punishment, and innocent. All the characters are antagonists to the narrator, as their primary role is to obstruct his path to the rose and imprison Fair Welcome, forcing the narrator to go to war against them with Love’s armies.
Some of the characters are given appearances that, in medieval times, would convey their varying personality traits. Rebuff is described as a brute who is “big and black, with bristly hair and fiery red eyes” (45). This is in line with the racism and colorism of the era—while blond hair and fair skin were seen as signs of goodness, dark coloration was treated as unattractive at best and demonic at worst. Shame is described as a nun, which aligns with her personality and allegorical characterization—she is afraid of being seen as sinful and wishes to appear praiseworthy.
Other characters are given fewer physical descriptors but characterized by their actions, which typically align with their name. Fear shakes whenever she faces opposition, while Evil Tongue spreads rumors and delights in harming others. Jealousy, the primary antagonist of the group, isolates others and is the primary motivator behind Fair Welcome’s kidnapping. Although each character is portrayed as antagonistic or at least unhelpful, Evil Tongue is the only one to die, when his tongue is cut out by False Seeming.
Although all of Love’s barons and fighters are important to the work, False Seeming and his companion Constrained Abstinence are given the most attention. Neither character is characterized by their nobility or goodness; instead, both are shown to be liars who try to appear better than they are. They are untrustworthy, devious, and intelligent, but in a contradiction, both are uniquely honest to Love when he demands that they reveal their true natures. While neither character is a fully round character, they show more complexity than many of the other allegorical figures, representing a hypocrite’s potential to do actual good despite their duplicity. Both characters are the key to breaking into Jealousy’s castle, as they use their duplicity to trick their way into the fortress.
Aside from having a “deceitful face,” False Seeming is not described as he actually appears. The narrator describes Constrained Abstinence as good-looking but too pale, which suggests the sense of deprivation and lack inherent in abstinence. Both characters don extensive religious disguises to infiltrate the castle, representing the poem’s interrogation of religious hypocrisy. Key to their disguises are their expressions, which are placid and kind, signifying their double natures but effective abilities. Both characters are additionally described as seeming to be “two heads […] together in a single hat” (186), which implies that enforced abstinence leads to duplicity and hypocrisy. While many of the pairs of characters in the work have unique natures, False Seeming and Constrained Abstinence are never apart due to abstinence’s importance to religious appearances of the day.
Allegories of Modern Life
View Collection
Beauty
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
French Literature
View Collection
Medieval Literature / Middle Ages
View Collection
Pride Month Reads
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection