57 pages • 1 hour read
Bernhard SchlinkA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This guide summarizes and discusses statutory rape, the Holocaust, and Nazi brutality, which feature in the source text.
Feelings versus numbness is a theme that propels the story. Without Michael’s intense feelings for Hanna, there is no story. Michael’s choice to be with her as a teen, his daily consumption of her trial, and his ongoing engagement with her in jail represent his strong feelings for her. Hanna stirs something inside him that no one else can—not Sophie, Gertrud, or his mother, resulting in his feelings becoming polarized. He feels very intensely for Hanna but feels numb toward others, resulting in alienation. Michael tries to hide his intense feelings and doesn’t tell Sophie, Gertrud, or his mother about Hanna. When he tells later romantic partners about her, their responses are underwhelming, and Michael states, “So I stopped talking about it. There’s no need to talk because the truth of what one says lies in what one does” (133). In other words, Michael feels he betrays his ongoing feelings for Hanna by talking about her. Other women can’t evoke the same intensity in him, and he wants to be around her. Even the older Hanna, after 18 years in jail, galvanizes him. Michael says, “I had seen that I had disappointed her before, and I wanted to do better, make up for it” (150); such phrasing evokes the emotional manipulation inherent in statutory rape and grooming. Michael’s feelings for Hanna make her the center of the world, reflecting the enduring repercussions of their abusive relationship.
Their time together is characterized by heightened feelings and passions, including sex and violence. Teen Michael admits, “I kept getting erections, but I didn’t want to masturbate. I wanted to be with her” (25), and Michael’s recollections of Hanna are sexually explicit. Sex and violence become intertwined when Hanna hits Michael with a belt when she feels abandoned, then caresses his wound. While their physical bond is also presented as beautiful, such actions hint at their relationship’s dark underbelly. Michael’s numbness comes into play when Hanna departs suddenly, leaving him brokenhearted. His subsequent relationships all involve an emotional distance; he is unable to feel deeply for women who are not Hanna.
The trial links to this theme, with Michael observing a “similar numbness” among those in the courtroom. The theme reveals the superficiality of the trial as people perform feelings. They act horrified at the witness testimonies, but hardly any of the nameless participants seem to have a genuine response to the testimony. Even the daughter who survived the church burning is numb. Numbness has its advantages; it can help a person lead a tidy, straightforward life. About the detached, obtuse judge, Michael says, “He had done everything the right way” (124). After the trial, Michael enjoys his numbness, stating, “It allowed me to return to and continue to live my everyday life” (124). Michael’s attempt to lead a detached, unfeeling life perpetuates his isolation. He divorces his wife and doesn’t appear to have much feeling for his daughter—she doesn’t take up much space.
The choice to send tapes to Hanna indicates that Michael loses his battle with numbness. As thorny, tangled, and problematic as they can be, Michael can’t set aside his feelings for Hanna. He feels dedicated to her for life, and he stays loyal to her after she dies by bringing her money to the daughter from the church. As Hanna is a former Nazi and a pedophile, Michael’s continued devotion to her is discomfiting. The book suggests that feelings don’t comfort or neatly follow societal norms, but it also questions whether immoral feelings condemn a person. Michael’s feelings make him feel guilty and complicit, yet he doesn’t suppress them; he exhaustively confronts them, in contrast to those in the courtroom.
Three secrets drive the story: the affair between Hanna and Michael, Hanna’s work as an SS guard, and her illiteracy. The covert affair propels the action in Part 1, and Hanna’s Nazi past and lack of reading and writing skills push the plot forward in Part 2 and Part 3. The secret affair continues to play a key role in later chapters, as the hidden relationship is why Michael cares about the trial and follows it. His strong feelings make him a keen observer and a dutiful correspondent for the imprisoned Hanna.
The intense secrets leave little room for other characters, reflecting Michael’s alienation in the aftermath of his relationship with Hanna. Other people quickly come and go. Michael introduces friends like Rudolf Bargen or other romantic interests like Sophie, but they don’t stick her around. Michael marries Gertrud, but they get a divorce. Michael doesn’t share secrets with these people. By contrast, secrets bond Hanna and Michael and create intense feelings. Michael complains that he and Hanna don’t share a world, but in an intangible way, they do. Their secrets produce a truth that only they know. No one else at the trial knows about their affair or Hanna’s illiteracy. Thus, the other members of the court remain nameless. They can’t have a rooted place in Michael and Hanna’s universe—they’re not in on all the secrets.
People can discover a person's secrets and still not understand their motives. Once Michael realizes Hanna can’t read, he tries to piece together narratives for her. He wants to make sense of her actions. His attempts to understand her generate questions—he wonders whether she sent people to Auschwitz to preserve her secret and dignity. While he decides that she’s not capable of that, Hanna remarks that no one understands her except for the dead. Michael’s narrative reflects his lifelong quest to understand Hanna, himself, and their relationship, but Hanna’s suicide suggests that such depth of understanding is ultimately futile.
Likewise, Michael tells some women about his relationship with Hanna, but it doesn’t help them understand him. The court exposes Hanna’s SS history to the general public, but their verdict represents a “grotesque simplification” (137), not understanding. About his story, Michael writes, “I think it is true, and thus the question of whether it is sad or happy has no meaning whatever” (165). True understanding is elusive. Understanding doesn't come with a set narrative or a specific feeling; it requires questions, not answers.
Michael constantly manipulates time and memory throughout the story. He starts as a teen, but he speaks of teen experiences as an adult. His memories of Hanna are vivid, but other memories, like the lies he tells his parents to deceive them about the bike trip or the lecture he’s struggling with when Hanna is about to be set free, remain unclear. Michael’s jumble of time and memory makes him an unreliable narrator. At the same time, he is open about his selective memory and time skips—he’s transparent. Nonetheless, the reader might have suspicions about him and his reluctance to give exact dates or years. It’s as if Michael is trying to conceal or deny something.
Arguably, Michael blends time and memory to make his teen relationship with Hanna less disquieting. He speaks about it from the perspective of an adult; there is a fraught gap, but his manipulation of time and memory lets teen Michael sound like adult Michael. In other words, Michael takes the reader back in time to his teen years, yet he retains a grown-up voice. The presence of a mature voice can lead the reader to forget that Michael is a teen. As such, Michael distorts time to normalize his affair with Hanna, subverting his assertions that the relationship did not traumatize him.
Then again, Michael continually references their age difference. As a teen, Michael doesn’t want to be seen with his mother in public anymore but adds, “[T]o be seen with Hanna, who was ten years younger than my mother but could have been my mother, didn’t bother me. It made me proud” (35). When they stay at inns, they register as a mother and son, and Hanna's nickname for him, “kid,” also reinforces their age gap. Here, it's as if Michael twists time to provoke the reader. When Michael visits Hanna in jail, he alternately acknowledges her age and reaffirms her youth, saying, “I sat next to Hanna and smelled an old woman” but then “Hanna was too young for it” (150). Like understanding, time and memory are elusive, and Michael exploits their fragile qualities.
The people in the trial also manipulate time and memory. They latch onto a narrative in which Hanna is the fearsome leader who prevents the rescue of the women in the church. Her coworkers create narratives in which she is the ringleader, impossible since she could not read or write. At the same time, the prosecutors who also have Nazi ties do not have their pasts examined; some people are allowed to move into the future by erasing their pasts. Others, like Hanna, remain bound by their pasts. The trial and Michael’s narrative distort time and memory to the same effect, molding the past into its most tolerable form.
Guilt
View Collection
International Holocaust Remembrance Day
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Oprah's Book Club Picks
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection
World War II
View Collection