36 pages • 1 hour read
Charles DuhiggA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Duhigg begins Chapter 6 examining the Rhode Island Hospital, which was notorious among its staff for human resource issues, angry doctors, and unhappy nurses. Up and down the organization, employees felt unable to speak up without serious repercussions. Lacking strong guidance and established routines, the hospital’s employees created their own bad habits, which often pitted nurses against doctors and led to serious mistakes in the operating room. By the early 2000s, the organization had reached a moment of crisis. This moment, Duhigg argues, presented an opportunity for broad institutional change.
In 1982, researchers Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter published An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The book focused on the routines that organizations practice. When companies have clear, structured routines, it facilitates camaraderie among individuals and departments that might otherwise compete: “For an organization to work, leaders must cultivate habits that both create a real and balanced peace and, paradoxically, make it absolutely clear who’s in charge” (166). When organizational leaders do not establish strong routines, employees will begin to establish habits on their own. In the case of most institutions, those habits are damaging for employees, consumers, and profits.
Duhigg jumps to his next case study, a deadly fire that occurred within the London Underground’s King’s Cross station. The Underground’s departments were so strictly delineated and competitive that when the fire erupted during rush hour in 1987, employees were uncertain how to address the flames. With this lack of protocol, the flames spread, engulfing the station and killing dozens of commuters. Like the Rhode Island Hospital, the fire was a tragic event that exposed the organization to sweeping change.
In Chapter 6, Duhigg’s authorial tone and prescriptive advice come out strong, indicating his closer familiarity with corporate habits compared to personal ones. He advises that if his reader owns or manages an organization, it’s imperative that employees follow a set of clearly defined policies and routines. Duhigg works from the belief that employees and departments within an institution are inherently competitive, battling for resources and power like childhood siblings. If organizational leaders fail to establish healthy habits, then employees will automatically create a set of bad routines independently.
In both the Rhode Island Hospital and the London Underground case studies, weak organizational leadership led to angry factions, competitiveness, and ultimately, death and disaster. However, just as individuals in crisis can improve their habits, so, too, can organizations: “Good leaders seize crises to remake organizational habits” (178), Duhigg writes. Duhigg places the responsibility for reshaping institutional habits not on the employees—whose behaviors are automatic—but on the organization’s leadership.
Profit, too, is still an important theme in this chapter, with Duhigg arguing that better habits lead to better profits: “Organizational habits offer a basic promise: If you follow the established patterns and abide by the truce, then rivalries won’t destroy the company, the profits will roll in, and, eventually, everyone will get rich” (162). As Duhigg similarly showed with the Starbucks case study, the author equates good organizational habits with financial profits.
By Charles Duhigg
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Community Reads
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Self-Help Books
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection