36 pages • 1 hour read
Charles DuhiggA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Introduced in Chapter 7, the familiarity loop describes a process by which marketing experts sandwich a new, unknown product between two familiar products. The human brain craves familiarity. One example Duhigg provides is that of butchers attempting to sell organ meat to American consumers during World War II, when consumers could not easily access choice cuts of meat. When these organ meats were churned, encased, and repackaged into something familiar, Americans learned to eat them because they appeared familiar. As Duhigg explains, “Whether selling a new song, a new food, or a new crib, the lesson is the same: If you dress a new something in old habits, it’s easier for the public to accept it” (210). Duhigg’s description of the familiarity loop relates to one of the book’s major themes, which is the skill with which corporations play on human behavior to market consumer goods. The familiarity loop is one tactic among many that marketing experts use to catch the eye of the buyer.
The author introduces the Golden Rule of habit change early in the book: “You Can’t Extinguish a Bad Habit,” he pronounces, “You Can Only Change It” (63). Because habits are so deeply embedded in our basal ganglia, attempting to eliminate them is impractical. Instead, we can trick our brains into performing new habits by updating the old. Key to this transformation is manipulating the habit loop. The Golden Rule is to change the loop’s routine but keep the cue and the reward exactly same.
The Golden Rule is best embodied in the book’s case study about Bill Wilson, who founded AA in the 1930s. Wilson’s program encourages participants to stop drinking by teaching them to change the routine portion of their drinking habit loop. When an individual feels lonely—the cue—they should reach for the phone to call their sponsor instead of heading to the bar—the routine. In the end, they receive the same reward: companionship and reduced loneliness.
The habit loop is the fundamental pattern by which our thousands of behaviors unfold. Duhigg familiarizes the reader with the loop in the book’s earliest chapters, thereby engraving the loop’s structure (cue > routine > reward) into the reader’s memory. Changing a habit loop is difficult, but possible. Key to that change is implementing the Golden Rule of habit change and identifying a keystone habit.
In the Appendix, Duhigg acknowledges that it is challenging to identify habit loops in the course of the day when we are bombarded with thousands of sounds, smells, noises, and routines. Despite the difficulties, Duhigg concludes that we are responsible, and legally liable, for our habit loops: “Everything we know about habits, from neurologists studying amnesiacs and organizational experts remaking companies, is that any of them can be changed, if you understand how they function” (270).
For anyone seeking to change a large number of habits in their personal life or at the organizational level, Duhigg suggests targeting one central habit first before attempting to tackle any others. A keystone habit is the type of habit that, once changed, initiates a cascade effect for all other related habits. In the case of Lisa Allen, for example, her choice to quit smoking positively affected her other poor behaviors, including her spending habits and health.
Dislodging a deeply rooted, difficult habit, such as smoking, comes down to willpower: “Dozens of studies show that willpower is the single most important keystone habit for individual success” (131). Do not expect to overhaul the entire system in one attempt, the author cautions. Tackling one single keystone habit first promises a small win for both individuals and organizations. By establishing new structures around a keystone habit, we can encourage other habits to fall into place.
In Chapter 8, Duhigg introduces the terms strong ties and weak ties. Strong ties describe close relationships between family members and friends. Weak ties define the looser relationships that connect larger communities, including networks of friends, church and social groups, and coworkers. In analyzing why some social movements grow and others fade out, social scientists and historians point to the level of strong and weak ties present in a community.
Rosa Parks, for example, had an extensive network of strong ties—families, friends, close associates—who in turn had an even larger network of weak ties. When policemen arrested Parks for refusing to give up her bus seat to a white passenger, the injustice spread like wildfire across this web of strong and weak connections. The same process supports other types of powerful social movements, including religious and political movements.
By Charles Duhigg
Books About Leadership
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Community Reads
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Psychology
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Self-Help Books
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection