40 pages • 1 hour read
Steve SheinkinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Throughout The Port Chicago 50, Sheinkin often focuses on the stories of individual historical players, narrating the ways in which they become emboldened to combat racism. Though each of these individuals has their own highly unique path towards action, Sheinkin frequently highlights the struggles, questions, and doubts that accompany one’s growing awareness of discrimination and the resolve to stop it.
In particular, Sheinkin often narrates the ways in which early experiences with racism can lead one to develop a deepened understanding of injustice. Sheinkin describes several childhood episodes for two of the most important characters in The Port Chicago 50, Joe Small and Thurgood Marshall. Both Small and Marshall encountered racial discrimination during their youth. In school, Small was frequently bullied by a small white student, who would call Small “Smokey”—drawing attention to the color of Small’s skin (28). Though the bully would frequently hide behind his stronger cousin to escape conflict, one day Small finds the bully on his own, and Small gives the bully “a good whipping” (28). In an episode that echoes Small’s bully, Marshall is called the “n-word” by a white man while trying to do his job as a deliveryman. Remembering his father, who told Marshall that he has a responsibility to fight anyone who uses the “n-word,” Marshall begins punching the white man, which leads to Marshall’s arrest. Rather than chastise Marshall for failing to do his job, Marshall’s boss tells him that he was right to standup for what is “right” (43). By describing both of these early stories, Sheinkin suggests that such initial encounters with discrimination can give one a resolve to fight against racism later in life.
However, Sheinkin also describes how it can be difficult to know the appropriate course of action for reacting to injustice. Sheinkin highlights this uncertainty when explaining Joe Small’s own doubts as to whether he should resist the order to load explosives. Following the Port Chicago disaster, Small and his fellow sailors are sent to Mare Island Naval Shipyard, where one day they are given work gloves used for loading explosives. Suspecting that they will soon be ordered to return to work, the sailors debate what to do. Sheinkin describes Small’s own internal doubts: “Small knew he was being treated unfairly by the Navy, but did that give him the right to disobey orders? […] could low-ranking sailors really defy the US Navy without expecting serious consequences?” (77). Small is deeply conflicted between his desire to follow his duty as a sailor and his awareness of the discriminatory treatment he is receiving. As Sheinkin emphasizes, the decision to fight injustice always involves a great deal of personal risk. Yet, in spite of such doubts, Small ultimately decides that refusing to perform unsafe work is the only right course of action.
While both the Port Chicago 50 sailors and AfricanAmericans throughout the US see the Navy’s practices as a clearly racist, the Navy’s white officers are unable to understand how their segregationist policies constitute racial discrimination. At times, the Navy is portrayed as adhering to segregation merely due to tradition. In the eyes of many Naval officers, segregation is a fact of the social order that the Navy has no right or power to oppose: “these problems were not created by the military and were not the military’s problems to solve” (9). However, for other Naval officers, segregation is an appropriate policy as they personally hold deeply racist beliefs about innate differences between white and black individuals. Even Daniel Armstrong, the commander of the African-American recruits at the Great Lakes Naval Training Center, does not allow black sailors to enroll in specialized training, as he “didn’t think they were smart enough” (19). In the eyes of many Naval officers, it was a simple fact that AfricanAmericans were inferior to whites. As such, segregation didn’t appear to be racist, but simply the most logical way of structuring the Navy.
The Navy’s blindness to its discriminatory practices is particularly evidenced by its inquiry into the Port Chicago explosion. In attempting to uncover the cause of the explosion, the Navy does not interview the black sailors, as it does not believe they can provide any meaningful insight into the event. By ignoring black witnesses, the Navy fails to hear evidence about how the sailors were forced to make loading explosives a competition, in addition to their lack of proper training in handling ammunition. Because of this omission, the Navy is able to improperly conclude that “there was no discrimination or any unusual treatment of these men” (51). In the eyes of one Naval officer, black sailors had a “consistent attitude towards discrimination,” always searching for an “opportunity to complain against fancied discrimination…” (95). For the Navy’s white officers, accusations of racial discrimination were merely imagined on the part of black sailors and without basis.
By Steve Sheinkin
Books About Art
View Collection
Books About Race in America
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Juvenile Literature
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
War
View Collection
World War II
View Collection
YA Nonfiction
View Collection