49 pages • 1 hour read
Paul AusterA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The unnamed narrator relates the story in the first person. Fanshawe, a childhood friend, is the central person in his life. They grew up together but have lost touch. The narrator is an article writer for magazines. Seven years ago, the narrator received a strange letter from Sophie, Fanshawe’s wife, saying that Fanshawe had disappeared and asking to meet the narrator to discuss an important matter.
The rest of the story is an extended flashback. After receiving Sophie’s letter, the narrator meets Sophie and Fanshawe’s three-month-old son, Ben, at her apartment in Chelsea. Sophie explains the story of his disappearance. Fanshawe was a difficult man but they loved each other. A while before the birth of their son, he left to see his mother in New Jersey and never returned. Ultimately, the police suggested that she hire a private detective. Sophie hired a man named Quinn, but the investigation was fruitless. She is convinced Fanshawe is dead. She doesn’t know much about his past. She taught music at a school but Fanshawe didn’t have a stable job. The narrator asks if he became a writer. Sophie says he did but that he never tried to publish his work.
Before Fanshawe disappeared, he asked Sophie to give his manuscripts to the narrator, as he is “the guardian of his work” (207). If the narrator thinks Fanshawe’s work is worth publishing he should get it published. If not, Sophie must destroy the manuscripts. The narrator is surprised by Fanshawe’s wish and is anxious about the responsibility. Sophie says that Fanshawe considered the narrator his best friend and read his articles with pride.
The narrator dreams of being a novelist but lacks the creativity to write fiction. He is best known as a brilliant critic. Still, he is flattered by Fanshawe’s opinion. Sophie hands him the manuscripts and he leaves.
The narrator reflects on Fanshawe. As a boy, he loved Fanshawe and looked up to him, copying his actions. The narrator feels that Fanshawe was mysterious and “inaccessible,” but more himself than anybody.
The narrator remembers Fanshawe’s “act of justice” when he gave the present he’d bought for a friend’s birthday to a boy who could not buy one (213). The narrator recalls their love for each other as children and thinks that writing was reasonable for Fanshawe because of his “inwardness.” Fanshawe wrote stories from a young age but remained social. However, on reaching adolescence, Fanshawe retreated and started writing seriously. Life in the New York suburbs could not satisfy him. During high school, his father died of cancer and his relationship with his mother became strained. Fanshawe took responsibility for his sister, Ellen, who was “troubled.”
One event remains vivid in the narrator’s memory. The two friends went on a drive and visited a cemetery, where Fanshawe spotted a newly dug grave. Fanshawe lowered himself into the hole and lay down, wanting to see how it felt. The narrator understands that it was “Fanshawe’s way of imagining his father’s death” (222). Returning home, they learned that Fanshawe’s father died during their drive.
Days pass before the narrator reads Fanshawe’s manuscripts. He is afraid he might be disappointed by Fanshawe’s work. Simultaneously, he is afraid it might be too good. He also realizes he wants to see Sophie again. He organizes Fanshawe’s material, discovering three novels, 100 poems, five plays, and 11 notebooks. He finds no clues about Fanshawe’s personal life.
The narrator has dinner with Sophie and they flirt. He explains the situation to her and she is not surprised. She wants to leave the past behind and trusts the narrator to make the right decisions. They don’t speak about Fanshawe again.
The narrator approaches Stuart Green, an editor, and gives him the manuscript of Fanshawe’s novel, titled Neverland. The editor is interested in the book and asks to see Fanshawe’s other writings. The novel gets accepted for publication, and the narrator writes an article on Fanshawe. The publication of Fanshawe’s writings is a “cause” that makes him feel “important.”
The narrator keeps seeing Sophie. As time passes they grow closer. Sophie makes him feel “human” and offers him a sense of belonging. On the narrator’s 30th birthday they sleep together.
The narrator begins his relationship with Sophie. He feels indebted to Fanshawe for bringing her into his life. Fanshawe’s novel is published to acclaim and the narrator feels the situation is unreal. The narrator notes that this is the beginning of the story and writing about it is a means of “escape.”
Stuart Green informs the narrator that rumors are circulating about Fanshawe. According to the rumors, the narrator is the original writer of the books and Fanshawe is an invention. The narrator considers publishing one of Fanshawe’s works under his own name, intrigued by the idea of a “secret identity.”
One day, the narrator receives a letter from Fanshawe. Fanshawe thanks him for all he has done and asks him to consider him dead and marry Sophie. He states that seven years after his disappearance he will be dead. He has abandoned writing, “an illness that plagued him” (240), and asks the narrator not to look for him, threatening to kill him if he does. The fact that Fanshawe is still alive troubles the narrator. He realizes that the man left voluntarily and feels he should have known from the start.
He decides to hide the truth from Sophie and has a growing feeling of “panic and fear” (241). Days later, he proposes to her and adopts Ben. They marry in New York and visit Sophie’s parents in Minnesota. On their return, Ben calls the narrator his dad.
The narrator immerses himself in daily life with Sophie and Ben. The earnings from Fanshawe’s books offer him financial stability, and he considers quitting his job to start writing a book. He wants to write a detective novel, but he encounters writer’s block and cannot continue.
Rumors that Fanshawe is a fictional figure persist and Stuart Green asks the narrator to write a biography of Fanshawe. The narrator sees this as an opportunity to write a good book. He discusses the matter with Sophie and she agrees.
The narrator knows that he cannot write the truth and remains ambivalent. Fanshawe’s biography will contain facts but the book will remain “a work of fiction” (248). The narrator explains that facts and details are insufficient, for people ask for stories for an attempt to make sense of reality. In the end, the self remains inaccessible. Having no clues about Fanshawe’s life, the narrator starts research. He wanders around New York asking people for information but people decline to speak to him. He recalls his old profession as a census-taker. When people would not respond to his questionnaire, the supervisor advised him to use his imagination. He filled the questionnaires with fictionalized facts. He finally states that “lives make no sense” (255). Reading Fanshawe’s notebooks, the narrator realizes that Fanshawe’s retelling of stories was a means to understand himself.
The narrator, Sophie, and Ben visit Fanshawe’s mother in New Jersey. The visit is tense and Mrs. Fanshawe is subtly hostile to Sophie. The narrator recalls his fascination with her as a child. She agrees to help him with Fanshawe’s biography. The two go to Fanshawe’s old room and the narrator finds some letters addressed to his sister, Ellen. They agree to photocopy them another time.
Days later, Mrs. Fanshawe calls the narrator to say she is going away for a month. She invites him to come copy the letters before she leaves, and the narrator agrees. She picks him up at the bus station and he notices how beautiful she is. Mrs. Fanshawe says Sophie is lucky she found him. The narrator copies the letters and sees that Mrs. Fanshawe has prepared lunch. Mrs. Fanshawe says she is happy to have him.
During lunch, Mrs. Fanshawe recalls her son, describing him as “dead” inside. She feels he hated her. When she starts crying, the narrator comforts her, and they end up having sex. The narrator is motivated by “hatred” and characterizes it an “act of violence” (267). He wishes Fanshawe were dead. He returns home, as Sophie expects him for dinner.
The narrator distances himself from Sophie and longs for “solitude.” They start quarrelling and Sophie thinks Fanshawe’s autobiography is the problem. He knows that undertaking the book is a mistake but cannot admit it to her. He continues working on it but realizes his goal is to find Fanshawe.
Fanshawe’s letters to Ellen help him gather some clues. He discovers that Fanshawe wandered around the country, changing jobs and working on a ship. At one point there Fanshawe defended a Black man from a racist attack. Fanshawe managed to find a place in the world and “be like everyone else” (273). Later, Fanshaw relocated to Paris and continued working on his writing. The letters mention some of Fanshawe’s acquaintances. While in Paris, Fanshawe became known as a writer. He left for the French countryside, where he worked as a caretaker for a friendly family who allowed him to stay in their house. There, Fanshawe sequestered himself and began writing with discipline. The narrator comments that he matured as a writer.
The narrator meets several of Fanshawe’s old friends and feels like a detective searching for clues, but the facts do not help him. He considers hiring Quinn, the private detective Sophie hired, but cannot locate him. Finally, the narrator decides to go to Paris. Sophie grows tense and wants to discard Fanshawe’s things. She tells the narrator that she sees him losing himself in Fanshawe’s biography and warns him that he is going to vanish.
The narrator arrives in Paris and finds it different from New York, characterizing it “an old-world city” (287). He speaks to people who knew Fanshawe but still finds no clues. He starts feeling disconnected from reality. He contacts the family in the country and locates the house where Fanshawe stayed. He talks to the people in the area but only one person knows him. The narrator decides to spend a few days in the house, hoping to rest and free his mind. However, he senses Fanshawe’s presence and realizes he cannot escape him. He returns to Paris for a month, drinking at bars and trying to forget Fanshawe. Ultimately, he reveals himself as the writer of City of Glass and Ghosts and hints at the end of the story.
One night, he sees a man at a bar and tries to convince himself it is Fanshawe. He approaches the man, who furiously insists his name is Peter Stillman. When he leaves, the narrator runs after him and they end up fighting. Stillman leaves him unconscious on the street. He remains in his hotel for three days, feeling “strange to be alive” (299). He finally calls Sophie to tell her he’s returning to New York.
Back in New York, the narrator and Sophie welcome a son named Paul. Time passes and they both stop mentioning Fanshawe, renewing their relationship. The narrator feels the truth is unimportant and never reveals the facts to Sophie. Still, he expects something to happen. He parallels Fanshawe to the death of himself.
The narrator receives a letter asking him to a meeting at Columbus Square in Boston. He arrives in Boston and goes to the address mentioned in the letter, finding a desolate four-story house. The door is unlocked and he enters, but the house seems to be empty. He waits for several minutes, then hears someone whispering his name from behind a closed door. The narrator asks if it is Fanshawe and the man behind the door tells him not to say that name. The narrator, certain it is Fanshawe, asks him to open the door, then starts pushing on the door. The man threatens to shoot him. The man says that today is his last day.
Fanshawe says that Quinn, the detective, was about to find him and he had to move around constantly. He tells the narrator that his book was bad and he was angry when it was published. Fanshawe reveals that he returned to New York and for weeks he camped outside the narrator and Sophie’s apartment. He says that they crossed paths but the narrator didn’t recognize him. The narrator is incredulous. Fanshawe departed again and traveled around the world working on a ship. When the ship reached Boston, he disembarked, and he has lived there ever since under the name of Henry Dark.
Fanshawe tells the narrator that there is a red notebook under the stairs that he has written for him. He asks him to return home and read it to find everything he needs to know. The story is finished.
The narrator goes to the station and reads the notebook as he waits for the train. He feels a “great lucidity” while reading it but understands little. Ultimately, everything remains “unfinished.” The story ends as he tears each page from the notebook and throws it in the trash.
The Locked Room solidifies the metafictional element of the three novels. It extends the trilogy’s philosophical exploration of the role of the writer and literature and uses the biography genre to investigate the boundaries between fiction and reality. Unlike City of Glass and Ghosts, The Locked Room begins in the first person, and toward the end, the narrator reveals himself as the writer of all three stories. The theme of The Writer as an Investigator of the Human Condition recurs as the unnamed narrator assumes the role of the writer/detective to solve the mystery of Fanshawe’s disappearance. The narrator doesn’t have the creativity to produce fictional work, and Fanshawe’s literature substitutes his own lack of inspiration.
As the narrator remembers his childhood friend, parallels with the previous stories emerge. Fanshawe, like the subjects of City of Glass and Ghosts, seems “inaccessible” to the narrator. Fanshawe’s literary work provides the only clue to his inner life, the only means for the narrator to understand his friend, and he finds meaning and purpose in publishing Fanshaw’s books: “I had stumbled onto a cause, a thing that justified me and made me feel important” (233). Unlike the protagonists of the first two stories, the narrator values love. His relationship with Sophie juxtaposes the possibilities of companionship with those of solitude and makes him feel “more human,” providing him with a sense of belonging.
When the narrator learns that Fanshawe is alive, reality becomes ambiguous. The theme of the writer as an investigator of the human condition interconnects with the theme of the limitations of language and life’s absurdity. The narrator undertakes the project of Fanshawe’s biography having no knowledge about the man’s personal life. As a biographer, he must investigate the facts of Fanshawe’s life, but he comes up against the constraints of a nonfictional, fact-based account: “Even though it was based on facts, it could tell nothing but lies” (248). The theme of the limitations of language and life’s absurdity reemerges when the narrator explains that knowledge of the facts cannot provide insight into the human self, as “the essential thing resists telling” (249). Considering life’s randomness and absurdity, as well as people’s desire for stories, the narrator concludes that “lives make no sense” (255). The narrator’s only way to access Fanshawe is through the man’s writing, his letters and notebook. However, these too stick to facts that do not enlighten the narrator. His research on Fanshawe only provides fragmented glimpses of the man’s life.
The narrator’s obsession in finding him leads him to Paris, the place where Fanshawe matured as a writer. As he continues his investigation, he loses interest in the biographical account. Here again the themes of the writer as an investigator of the human condition and the limitations of language and life’s absurdity connect. The narrator ultimately abandons the project, recognizing the biography as inadequate for his purposes. Instead he focuses on finding the man himself to make sense of the absurd case and free himself from his haunting presence. However, by staying in Fanshawe’s room in the French countryside, the narrator realizes he cannot escape. He has connected his own life with Fanshawe’s and now makes sense of himself through him. His obsession with Fanshawe grows as he arbitrarily hunts down a man in Paris, trying to convince himself he is Fanshawe. The real Fanshawe remains “inaccessible” to the narrator.
Toward the end of The Locked Room the narrator reveals himself as the writer of the trilogy’s novels, reinforcing their metafictional dimension. Paradoxically, the “I” of the narrator and writer does not connect to the real Paul Auster, the author of The New York Trilogy. The unnamed narrator remains a fictionalized character, a literary device announcing the trilogy’s purposes. At the core of Auster’s metafictional intentions is the theme of Storytelling as an Endless Struggle, the continual quest to make meaning of reality and the world through stories.
Even when the narrator finally meets Fanshawe, the latter remains hidden behind a door, symbolizing the unknowability of his character. Fanshawe does not provide a reason for his disappearance. When he mentions that at one point after his disappearance, he camped outside the narrator’s house watching him and Sophie, Fanshawe connects to City of Glass’s Daniel Quinn. The text also reflects the first story in that Fanshawe uses Henry Dark as his new name, and the red notebook alludes to Quinn’s red notebook. Fanshawe remains an elusive figure whose life is only accessible through written words. He warns the narrator that the story is finished, but for the narrator “everything [remains] open, unfinished, to be started again” (313). Even though he enjoys reading the red notebook, he struggles to understand it, and the story remains incomplete, impossible to finish. Ultimately, all of the trilogy’s mysteries remain unsolved. The theme of the limitations of language and life’s absurdity is apparent when the narrator tears out the notebook’s pages. Language is an insufficient means to explain reality’s mysteries, but it is simultaneously an essential tool of expression.
By Paul Auster