30 pages • 1 hour read
Edgar Allan PoeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The old man’s clothing and possessions are as mysterious as his behavior; the diamond and dagger that the narrator observes beneath the old man’s cloak serve as ambiguous symbols of an indeterminate identity. Diamonds are created under extreme heat and pressure, but when they are mined, they look rough, like coal. Like a diamond, the man has a rough and aged exterior, but underneath, there is something the protagonist deems valuable, making him stand out from the crowd.
However, like the contradictory emotions the narrator observes in the old man’s face, the diamond and dagger are contradictory symbols, representing the possible duality of this man’s identity. The diamond could be a marker of status, symbolizing the man’s possible wealth—similar to the “beautiful” linen he wears (Paragraph 14)—but like the man’s “filthy and ragged” clothing, the dagger could represent dangerous criminal behavior and “blood thirstiness” (Paragraph 13). By juxtaposing these two items, Poe reinforces the theme of Unknowable Secrets within the story. A symbol of wealth and status contrasted with a symbol of crime and violence raises questions about the man’s identity that by the end of the story still remain unanswered.
While these symbols have many features that are contradictory in nature, they also have two things in common: strength and concealment. A dagger is a weapon used in close-combat; it requires strength, and the blade is easily concealed. Similarly, diamonds are one of the strongest natural materials in the world, and they hide deep beneath the earth’s surface. In this sense, the symbols represent how powerful these hidden secrets are, at least to the unnamed protagonist, who ultimately gives up his pursuit of the old man and his past.
The motif of clothing is associated with the narrator’s attempts to read and classify the people he observes in the London streets. The type of clothing a person wears marks their social status and values, and the variety of styles the narrator observes shows the numerous types of people that populate modern cityscapes.
The narrator’s repeated discussions of clothing advance the theme of the Anonymity of City Life. While it seems easy for the narrator to classify the individuals in the crowd according to their social class based on their clothing, he ultimately learns nothing more about them and only speculates about their identities based on arbitrary clues. One example of this is his discussion of the two types of clerks: the “junior clerks” have “tight coats and bright boots” (Paragraph 6), whereas the seemingly older “upper clerks” wear “coats and pantaloons […] with white cravats and waistcoats, broad and solid-looking shoes, and thick hose or garters” (Paragraph 7). The narrator observes that the younger clerks seem to be interested in fashion, whereas the older clerks are interested in “respectability” (Paragraph 7), but he discerns nothing about them as individuals—only as general categories. Through the eyes of the protagonist, it can be argued that city life divides people into different classes based on wealth and status but ultimately robs them of any individualism: They are, first and foremost, members of their social class, as indicated by their possessions and superficial physical traits.
The lack of detail the narrator learns about these individuals also highlights The Complexity of the Human Mind by calling into question whether city life allows people to obscure that complexity by offering endless ways for people to hide themselves and their activities. For example, the desire to blend in with the crowd is evident in the old man, as his anxiety grows whenever he is apart from the crowd. However, his appearance makes him stand apart from them, while other members of the crowd dress in a way that helps them blend in with the social class and groups with which they identify.
A large and well-known city that experienced much industrialization in the 19th century, London was in some ways the quintessential representation of modern urban spaces during Poe’s time. Due to its size, rapid expansion, and population growth, London is an ideal setting for a piece of Gothic fiction about secrecy.
Founded by the Romans in 47 AD, London is much older than any of the American cities in which Poe lived and wrote. During his lifetime, it was also one of the largest cities in the world. This dense population promoted growth as well as disease, which can be seen reflected in the protagonist’s illness mentioned at the beginning of the story. While considered a place of tradition and ceremony, London’s rapid industrialization meant that it was also a place where ancient and modern constantly clashed. In this way, the city embodies the historical transition and change of the 19th century. By setting the story in London, Poe associates the anonymity of city life with modernity, highlighting how the recent expansion of cities affected the people who lived within them.
Doubles are a common motif in Gothic fiction. While they are often used to represent two sides of a character’s personality (such as in The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde), they can also draw parallels between two opposing forces or characters to create tension and conflict. In “The Man of the Crowd,” the narrator and the old man could be considered doubles. While readers cannot determine whether the old man is a mirror reflection of the protagonist, since little information is provided about the latter, both characters reflect each other’s mysterious history and motivations. In addition to this, they are solitary in nature. The protagonist has a sense of superiority that sets him apart from the crowd, and he chooses to pursue someone else whose characteristics stand apart. While the narrator argues that the old man “refuses to be alone” (Paragraph 20), the old man never actually interacts with anyone, which makes him alone despite the fact that he surrounds himself with people. In the end, the narrator fails to connect with him on even a visual level; when he looks directly into the old man’s face, the old man does not look back. Ultimately, they both go their separate ways, showing their similarities without revealing any pertinent details.
By Edgar Allan Poe