The Hammer of Thor

In literature, the “Found Family” trope involves a group of characters who, though biologically unrelated, form family-like bonds based on their shared experiences—especially experiences of overcoming hardship together. Explore this trope in The Hammer of Thor by comparing the friends’ “found family” with their biological families. How are they similar, and how are they different?

Consider the role of authority in this story, whether that authority is parents, deities, law enforcement, or something else. Does Riordan imply that authority is the same as power, or are they different? Use examples from the text to illustrate your points.

Explore how Amir’s character illustrates aspects of belief and understanding, specifically through his view of the Norse world. Do you think Magnus really healed Amir’s mind prior to Amir seeing the Bifrost? If so, what does this action say about the mind and its fragility? If not, what do you think allowed Amir to finally see the Norse world?

What does Alfheim represent about supremacism and discrimination? Analyze Magnus and Hearth’s interaction with the elven police officers. Why do the Alfheim cops get away with treating Magnus and Hearth the way they do, and what societal structure has made the officers believe such treatment is acceptable? While you should cite textual details to support your answer, you may also draw real-world parallels.

In Chapter 40, after defeating the spirit of Fear, Sam states that “the only way to conquer Fear is to attack it head-on” (324)—but does this statement hold true for other plot events? Are there other situations in which the characters’ fear can be conquered only through confrontation, or is this adage more simplistic than Sam suggests?

Compare and contrast how gods and mortals respond to situations in The Hammer of Thor. What are the major differences and similarities between the two groups? What about the natures of gods and mortals makes them act the way they do? Support your answers with evidence from the text.

Consider Randolph’s reasons for making a deal with Loki. How does this deal highlight the story’s thematic concern with moral ambiguity? Does Riordan implicitly argue for a certain judgment of Randolph’s decision, or is the narrative stance impartial?

Explore Alex’s use of Loki’s symbol. Does Alex’s use of the symbol somehow weaken Loki’s power when used against her? If so, how? If not, why, and what other effect might her use of the symbol have? Support your answer with evidence from the text.