52 pages • 1 hour read
C. S. LewisA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section includes descriptions of racist attitudes and biases put forth by the author.
Today, people understand that objects move in accordance with the laws of physics. In the Medieval Model, objects moved because of their sympathies, or their natural inclinations. Chaucer describes the “‘kindly enclyning’ of terrestrial bodies” (69) toward their rightful places. Despite the implication of this turn of phrase, medieval thinkers did not believe that objects were literally sentient. They recognized four existences: “mere existence (as in stones), existence with growth (as in vegetables), existence with growth and sensation (as in beasts), and all those with reason (as in men)” (70). Inanimate objects’ “enclyning” reflected God’s will at work in the universe.
Everything in the Model was made up of four sympathetic and antipathetic properties called the Four Contraries: “hot, cold, moist, and dry” (71). When God created the universe out of Chaos, he combined these properties to form the four elements. Hot and dry became fire, hot and moist became air, moist and cold made water, and cold and dry made earth. Each element was arranged in its particular place in the universe. The Medieval Model was largely based on the Ptolemaic universe, a geocentric model, in which the sun, moon, and seven planets were believed to orbit Earth. They were all moved by a sphere called the Primum Mobile; all stars were fixed points of light in the sky and did not rotate.
Beyond the fixed stars, the universe was filled with the infinite light of God. The size and position of the Earth could induce vertigo; it was at the center and bottom of a large but finite universe, so looking up was akin to looking at a high, vaulted ceiling. The medieval person could look at the universe and see everything in its correct place. The Model was believed to be highly ordered and perfect. The ordered, finite universe meant that “the pathless, the baffling, and the utterly alien” was “markedly absent from medieval poetry” (74). Many writers depicted Earth not to scale, even in accordance with their own Model; the size of objects in both art and literature was meant to convey importance rather than true scale.
All objects in the universe were moved by the Primum Mobile, which was in turn moved by God. The rotation of the Primum Mobile caused all other heavenly spheres (planets) to orbit around the Earth. The Earth, as the center of the universe, did not orbit. Astrology, or the ability of the spheres to influence Earth, was part of the Model, though the Church discouraged it on the grounds that it was idol worship and politically dangerous. Pagan influence is clear in the Model, for the planets took the names of Roman deities. Many works of medieval art refer to Jupiter or Venus, denoting both the deity and the planet.
Each planet had its own associated deity, archetype, metal, and relationship to future events. Jupiter, for instance, was connected to a kingly archetype, tin, and a prosperous fortune. In the Model, the universe was not a dark void. Night was only Earth’s shadow, but the majority of the universe was filled with the sun’s light and with the music of the spheres. All these factors taken together would have made the universe seem infinitely alive, warm, and bright to the medieval mind.
In the Medieval Model, the planets rotated because of their love for God. They aimed to resemble God by taking the most perfect shape (the sphere) and by orbiting in the most perfect circular orbit. Unlike the “kindly enclyning” of inanimate objects, the celestial spheres were considered to be intelligent beings. They were often likened to or conflated with angels. This idea raised the question following rhetorical question: if a planet were intelligent and made in God’s image, why could it have a negative influence on people? The medieval answer was that humans could respond positively or negatively to any influence; bad outcomes were caused by human sin, not by the spheres themselves.
Between the moon and the Earth, there existed aerial beings called daemons. Early writers divided daemons into good and bad, with the good daemons occupying the higher levels of the aether and the bad the lower. Later writers considered all daemons to be evil; they eventually developed into the concept of demons in Christianity. With this conception of the universe, medieval people could look up at the sky and believe themselves to be gazing on God’s creation from its outskirts. Most religious writers found the anthropoperipheral nature of the Model to be contrary to Christian beliefs, and for this reason, they did not include it in their works. However, Dante was a notable exception. Lewis suggests that the perfect Ptolemaic universe may have been too ordered, and his next chapter therefore introduces an element of uncertainty.
The Longaevi, or “longlivers,” did not quite fit into the otherwise regular Model. They were what most people would call fairies, though Lewis finds that word to be trite. The Longaevi were not creatures from children’s books; instead, they were older beings who arose from folklore of the medieval period and earlier. There are countless references to “elves, hags, fairies,” (91) and other such creatures in mythology and folklore. Lewis divides them into three categories. The first was the “bugbear”: dark fairies thought to be “enemies of God” (91) who were often used to frighten children. These stories were compelling to the medieval mind because meeting an unkind fairy on a dark night seemed more plausible than “seeing Proteus rise from the sea” (92).
A second type of fairy appears in the works of Shakespeare or Drayton: the little folk or Faery Elves. These fairies were smaller than humans, though their exact size was in doubt. (The maid for Lewis’s family claimed to have seen fairies the size of children.) Such fairies were mirthful but shy of humans. The third variety of fairy that Lewis describes is the Fairy Damsel. These creatures, also called High Fairies, sought out humans for amorous encounters. They were bright and vivid, often displaying great wealth or luxury, and they were the same size as humans. High Fairies were also passionate and willful, often engaging in fights. Medieval people categorized fairies in four different ways. Some thought that they were: 1) A rational species that was different from humans or angels; 2) A special class of demoted angels; 3) Dead; or 4) Fallen angels or devils. Lewis finds literary evidence for all four of these beliefs but concludes that no consensus was ever reached; the Longaevi remain elusive.
In this section, Lewis examines The Medieval Relationship to Literature as it pertains to the structure of the universe. Much of the Medieval Model was drawn directly from Ptolemy, but some details came from other classical sources, especially the planets’ names and astrological attributes. The result is a cosmology that merely appears to be one cohesive whole but is in reality a patchwork of different sources. It is also important to note that the medieval relationship to astronomy was different for religious writers than for other writers and laypeople. The Model was simply not Christian enough to merit a mention in the most Christian writings, which suggests a tension between the people’s stated religion and their understanding of the universe. Lewis never resolves this tension, except to say that Dante was the rare writer who managed to pull Ptolemaic astronomy and Christianity together into relative harmony.
Classical Influence on the Medieval Model is particularly prevalent, especially regarding the medieval people’s adoption of Ptolemy’s geocentric universe. Astrology had some classical roots, as well; although it certainly was not Christian, it was not exclusively or explicitly pagan, either. The major Christian addition that medieval people made to Ptolemy’s universe was to add their belief that the love of God causes the movements of the spheres. This is a spirited attempt to combine religious doctrine with observable astronomical effects. Notably, Lewis makes one erroneous claim when describing the rotation of the spheres. He says that the spheres, in imitation of God, orbit in perfect circles, but in fact, the Ptolemaic model required that planetary orbits include epicycles to explain why they went into retrograde when viewed from Earth. Lewis mentions epicycles briefly, but he never frames them as a potentially clumsy flaw in an otherwise quite perfectly ordered cosmology.
However, the Ptolemaic universe was a bastion of The Prevalence of Hierarchy and Order, despite the small issue of the epicycles. This model depicted a highly ordered universe in which everything was in its rightful place, in stark contrast to today’s astronomical model, which leaves considerable room for uncertainty. Medieval minds found this model to be satisfying and beautiful, for it allowed people to feel that even if humans were not cosmically significant, they did exist within an essentially benevolent and even joyous universe. At this point in the lesson, Lewis pointedly interjects his own viewpoint to ask if this Model might not be too ordered, and his discussion of the Longaevi is meant to elaborate on this idea. Lewis explains that fairies are primarily derived from European folklore that predates Christianity and has no Classical roots. Significantly, he is in effect describing exactly the kind of spontaneous culture that he condemns in so-called “savage” cultures, without apparently noticing the irony of his statements.
Within Lewis’s analysis, fairies of all shapes and sizes do not fit precisely into the Medieval Model because they originate outside of it. Or, more accurately, the Model comes largely from imported cultures (both classical and Christian), while fairy stories of all kinds are indigenous to Britain and other parts of Europe. The various inconclusive attempts that Lewis describes to codify fairies within the Model’s accepted types of existence speak both to medieval people’s love of categorization and the incontrovertible fact that some things resist categorization at every turn. Notably, while relatively few modern people could describe Boethius’s impact on the medieval psyche, many would associate stories of fairies and elves with the medieval era, especially in Britain. Thus, what Lewis struggles to integrate with the Medieval Model is in fact one of its most enduring cultural legacies.
By C. S. Lewis
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Art
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Books & Literature
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Earth Day
View Collection
Medieval Literature / Middle Ages
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection