45 pages • 1 hour read
John WyndhamA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
From the very start of the novel, the question of moral duty is raised. When Bill Masen learns he is one of the “lucky few” who can still see after a catastrophe causes mass blindness, he is immediately thrown into an ethical dilemma of choosing between altruism and self-preservation (i.e., helping himself or others). When considering whether to aid the blind hospital residents, he ultimately decides it would be useless: “There was a feeling that I ought to do something about it. […] if I were to, if I did get them outside—what then?” (17).
With no governmental help, and no real understanding if what occurred, neither Bill nor those he might help stand a good chance of living long. Bill determines early on that the sighted, who can fend for themselves, will survive longer than the blind. While fleeing to London, he sees people struggling to find food and help, and he constantly wonders if he should do something. Quite often, he chooses to keep going on his own. Though he does try to save a blind girl from being forced into sexual slavery by a group of drunken men, he ultimately decides she is better off with them: “[i]f there was to be any survival, anyone adopted by this gang would stand a far better chance than she would on her own” (42).
Finally, Bill chooses altruism when he rescues Josella, a sighted woman, from a blind captor who was attempting to beat her into submission. Despite the man’s harsh treatment, Josella later defends his actions: “[…] he wasn’t too bad a man really. Only he was frightened. Deep down inside him he was much more frightened than I was” (49). In fact, Josella grows to feel guilty for not helping the blind more, even though the blind are increasingly turning to violence if they come across a person who can see.
Bill and Josella’s ruminations about helping the blind or helping themselves take on a larger significance when they find a group of survivors at University Building. The group, comprised of both the sighed and the blind, plans to make a self-sufficient community where blind and sighted people will engage in compulsory intercourse to hopefully produce children that can see. Josella quickly agrees with this unorthodox edict, feeling it is the only way to both save society and help the blind. Bill, however, must be coerced as his sense of altruism does not naturally extend to sex as a communal act of survival.
Another struggle between the concepts of altruism and self-preservation takes shape at Tynsham. Miss Durrant, who balked at the mandatory procreation decree at University Building, makes her own community where it is imperative that members adhere to Christian values or face expulsion. This makes Miss Durrant a bit of an ironic figure, as Christian compassion would dictate that she helps everyone, regardless of their beliefs. As such, her group is altruistic in name but self-preservationist in practice. Because of this, neither Bill nor Coker can remain, and ultimately the group falls to ruin.
In the final chapter, Bill and Josella must decide once more between saving themselves, by staying on Shirning Farm, or helping others, by joining Beadley’s group on the Isle of Wight. Bill ponders what he has learned about survival up to now: “I thought of Coker and his talk of the leader, the teacher, and the doctor—and of all the work that would be needed to support us on our few acres” (181). In the end, they decide to join the group and work to build a better world for others.
Several times throughout the novel, the inevitability of chaos and manmade destruction looms large. Michael Beadley, during a speech about how delicate humanity’s chance at survival is, calls to mind the aftermath of World War II. He compares it to being on a tightrope:
In any single moment of the years since then the fatal slip might have been made. It is a miracle that it was not. […] But sooner or later that slip must have occurred. It would not have mattered whether it came through malice, carelessness, or sheer accident: the balance would have been lost and the destruction let loose (83-84).
Though his speech is meant to empower the traumatized masses in his group, Bill recognizes the larger implications of Beadley’s assessment.
For Bill, neither the triffids’ violence nor the comet were acts of God; they were the product of human folly. He believes that the comet everyone saw was actually a government weapon that spread radiation (potentially creating the mysterious sickness as well). Nor is Bill of the mind that triffids came from space, as others posit: “My own belief, for what that is worth, is that they were the outcome of a series of biological meddlings—and very likely accidental, at that” (21).
Years later, after Bill and Josella have made a home together, he recalls Beadley’s tightrope metaphor. He says the mass blindness and ensuing chaos was an example of humanity falling off the rope. While he has hopes for the future of humanity, he knows it will never fully learn its lesson because history is always doomed to repeat itself: “Anyway, once they’ve beaten the triffids, and pulled themselves out of this mess, they’ll have plenty of scope for making brand-new mistakes of their very own” (173).
This belief is proven true when Torrence comes to their farm and demands they acquiesce to the feudalist group he represents. The group’s ideology is an even more extreme version of Coker’s early philosophy: blind and sighted people are forced together—on threat of violence—to build a society that will ultimately dominate the world. As Dennis laments, “Great God almighty! We’ve lived through all this—and now the man proposes to start a war!” (187).
Considering Coker’s group fell apart, Torrence’s way of life is clearly folly; as Bill says, “The whole thing’s clearly preposterous […] It doesn’t stand a chance” (189). While Torrence’s fate is not revealed, readers can assume he was killed by a gang of triffids, metaphorically signaling an impending failure of the entire feudalist group.
After mass blindness ensues, one of the biggest setbacks for characters in The Day off the Triffids is the destruction of towns and the expiration of foodstuffs. This destruction is exacerbated as nature begins reclaiming its hold on everything humankind touched. Bill notes this change as he roams England looking for food and shelter:
Large patches of plaster detached from house fronts had begun to litter the sidewalks. Dislodged piles and chimney pots could be found in the streets. […] Through many a window one had glimpses of fallen ceilings, curves of peeling paper, and walls glistening with damp (161).
Along with the decay of material things, nature begins reclaiming the earth itself:
Grass and weeds had a good hold in the gutters and were choking the drains. Leaves had blocked downspoutings so that more grass, and even small bushes, grew in cracks and in the silt in the roof gutterings. Almost every building was beginning to wear a green wig beneath which its roofs would damply rot […] The gardens of the parks and squares were wildernesses creeping out across the bordering streets. Growing things seemed, indeed, to press out everywhere […] On all sides they were encroaching to repossess themselves of the arid spaces that man had created (161).
It is as if nature is getting revenge for being subjugated by humanity’s desire to expand and focus on manmade technologies. With this organic resurgence, ghost towns look less like haunted remembrances of humanity’s peak and more like nature reclaiming its domain. As Bill tells Josella, “The countryside is having its revenge, all right […] Nature seemed about finished then— ‘Who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him?’” (170).
Blind and sighted people alike are relegated to pre-industrial methods of surviving. While some groups have access to weapons, modes of transportation, and resources like gas, people must forage for food and build more communal societies to survive. It is a return to a simpler time.