logo

60 pages 2 hours read

Kristin Harmel

The Book of Lost Names

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Individual Morality and Responsibility

In times of great peril, a person is defined by the choices they make. Some choose great power, while others choose great love; some put their own desires first, while others sacrifice themselves for the good of humanity.

During the horrors of the Nazi reign, the massive deportation and execution of millions of innocent Jewish civilians begs the question of how members of humanity be so depraved as to participate in such activity. Although the novel does not showcase any true Nazis as characters—aside from Erich who later repents—it contains numerous civilians who choose to side with the Nazis in pursuit of personal gain. Take Madame Fontain, for instance: As a mother with two children, Fontain should sympathize with the hundreds of thousands of Jewish children facing barbaric treatment after their parents’ arrests. Instead, Fontain applauds that “they got one of [them], at least” (41) after Tatuś’s arrest, angry that the entire Traube family wasn’t swept up in the raid. In war, everyone has choices, and Fontain chooses to side with those with the most power at the time: the Nazis. However, it is her lack of personal integrity that equates her with the darkness of Nazi evil. Her hatred of Jews, which matches the Nazi mentality, overshadows her loyalty to her country and the citizens there. Similarly, when presented with the choice between his own death or the betrayal of hundreds of his friends and countrymen, Joseph chooses to send all of his former allies to their deaths in exchange for his safety. Perhaps the most interesting concept is how the choice to do what is morally corrupt visibly changes characters’ attributes and demeanor. Fontain with her “smug smile” (41) and Joseph with “fury burning in [his] eyes” (348) show no hesitation in participating, however actively or passively, in the annihilation of millions. Their personalities and features become the physical manifestations of evil, proving that evil corrupts within and without.

In contrast, the majority of characters in the novel willingly sacrifice themselves for the common good. Rémy, Eva, Père Clément, and most of the men and women of Aurignon know that their choices to help Jewish refugees could end in sadistic torture and execution, but they do so because it is the moral and humanitarian thing to do. After the Nazi raids, many of them give the ultimate sacrifice rather than betray their friends—unlike Joseph, whose decision to save himself draws condemnation and judgment. However, Joseph—and Madame Fontain, to an extent—is so judged because he capitalizes on an opportunity to seize power and control the fates of others. It is fitting that Erich is the person who kills him—Erich, who could not “ignore [his] conscience any longer” (261) and therefore turns away from power and evil to do what is morally right. Erich attains forgiveness and redemption for his action, while those who seek power do not.

The Preservation of Identity

The Nazi plan to exterminate the Jewish race was carried out in stages, moving from isolation to dehumanization to genocide. Marginalizing people symbolically through yellow stars strips them of their humanity and identity, and the challenge that survivors faced was how to balance the retention of their former selves with the need to pretend to be someone new.

Mamusia’s claim that the Nazis are “erasing [them] [...] [so] not even [their] names will remain” (130) prompts Eva to protect and preserve the original identities of the Jewish children. Although keeping verified records of true Jewish identity is dangerous, she wants to give them a way to “find their way home” (147) after the war is over. By giving them Christian names on their documents, she offers them a false cloak of protection that will enable them to avoid suspicion, but this erasure of Jewish names angers Mamusia even more. To Mamusia, the destruction of a Jewish name, even temporarily, is an assault on the faith itself, even though the alternative—losing Jewish lives—ends in the same result. Rémy’s creation of the secret code in the Book of Lost Names enables Eva to keep these precious records safe.

Unfortunately, the seizure of the Book of Lost Names by the Nazis puts an end to Eva’s dream of reuniting Jewish children with their birth families. By all practical purposes, her plan fails, and Eva rebuilds her life to echo this loss: She grants herself a fresh start after marrying Louis and erases the hero of the French resistance that she had been in her past life. However, as the final chapters prove, one’s identity never truly disappears. Eva is unable to escape the ghost of the person she used to be, and the reemergence of the Book of Lost Names 60 years later offers her one more opportunity to make it right. Although the ending is overshadowed by the reconnection between Rémy and Eva, she and Otto spend hours deciphering the code in the Book to find as many children as possible. Therefore, while the Book itself might not have led to the reunification of families as Eva intended, it preserved exactly what it was supposed to: the true identities of the Jewish children smuggled out of a war-torn country and, by extension, Jewish culture and heritage.

Relationships in Times of War

The stressful and demanding nature of war takes a toll mentally, spiritually, and emotionally on everyone involved. When combined with great loss, that toll is exacerbated, creating divisions and estrangement in personal relationships that cannot handle the strain; but, for those that can handle it, living on the cusp of danger and death can strengthen the belief that one must live and love fully without restraint, for there is nothing left to lose.

One of the most painful relationships in the text is between Mamusia and Eva. Mamusia’s fragile hope that Tatuś is still alive creates tunnel-vision for her: She cannot see any truth beyond what she thinks she knows, and her attempts to force Eva to make arrangements for hypothetical situations lay a large burden of guilt on Eva’s shoulders. After all, it is Eva who was “too late,” Eva who “failed him” (127) by not saving him from Auschwitz, and Eva who “abandon[ed] [her] father” (149) by choosing to work with the resistance. Although Mamusia’s delusion does end up to be true—a testament to her own sixth sense about her husband of 30 years—it does not negate the detrimental effects of her hateful and condemnatory words and actions toward Eva. Mamusia’s last words may have been in support of her daughter, but her actions up until that point prove that she is willing to let the ghosts of what might have been override the love of her flesh-and-blood daughter.

Eva’s chances at true relationships come with those who are not related by blood but who share her devotion to a cause. Madame Barbier and Père Clément stand in as surrogate parents for her; Rémy offers her love and passion; the children offer her a sense of motherhood. Everyone in the resistance lives in daily fear of losing their lives, yet those feelings never translate into the anger and resentment seen in Mamusia. It is instead the shared fear of death and dedication to a higher cause that unites these men and women and makes their emotional bonds stronger than any created by blood.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text