49 pages • 1 hour read
PlatoA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Socrates applauds Agathon’s description of Love and then begins questioning him. Together, they establish that Love loves and desires things that are not in his possession since one does not desire what one already has. Since Agathon argues that gods “love things of beauty,” Socrates concludes that “Love needs and lacks beauty” (40). Socrates next asks Agathon if “anything good is also attractive,” and he agrees this is so (41). Thus, Socrates concludes that Love lacks both attractive and good qualities, which Agathon cannot refute.
After questioning Agathon, Socrates describes an “account of Love” that he learned from Diotima, a woman from Mantinea who was “an expert in love,” among other things (41). Before speaking with her, Socrates held similar views to Agathon. Diotima showed Socrates that “Love wasn’t attractive or good,” but this did not mean that Love was unattractive and bad (42). Not being attractive is different from being ugly, and not being good is different from being bad. A middle ground exists, and this is where Love lives, in the middle ground between attractive and unattractive and good and bad.
Diotima says that Love cannot be a god, since gods are good and attractive. Love, instead, is “[a]n important spirit,” a mediator who occupies “the middle ground between humans and gods,” translating and conveying messages between gods and humans (43). Since the divine and human “cannot meet directly,” spirits fill the space in between them, making “the universe an interconnected whole” (43).
Socrates then asks who Love’s parents are, which Diotima agrees to tell him, though it is “rather a long story” (43). At a celebration for Aphrodite’s birth, Poverty was impregnated by Plenty and gave birth to Love, who became a follower of Aphrodite because he “was conceived during her birthday party” and “is innately attracted towards beauty” (44). Because his parents are Poverty and Plenty, Love always hovers between lack and abundance.
Socrates asks Diotima “what do humans gain from” Love (46)? Diotima answers that “possession of good things” makes “people happy”; this is “common to everyone” and is the generic form of Love (46). Further, people do not want goodness temporarily; they want it “to be theirs for ever,” which Diotima links to the desire for immortality (48). Achieving the kind of immortality available to humans—who, unlike the gods, are temporary and mutable—requires procreating “in a beautiful medium,” since it is beauty that creates the attraction necessary for procreation (49). Since, as Socrates and Diotima previously agreed, the goal of love is to possess goodness forever, it must also follow that humans “desire immortality along with goodness” (49).
Every person is “physically and mentally pregnant,” meaning that all want to procreate (49). Men who are physically pregnant tend to be attracted to women because they seek immortality through having children. The offspring of men who are mentally pregnant tend to be virtue and wisdom: They are “the creations brought into the world by the poets,” craftsmen who do “original work,” and wisdom that enables “self-discipline and justice” (52).
Those who are impregnated with virtue from childhood, when they become adults, seek beauty in the form of an attractive mind so they “can give birth,” meaning they seek a lover who will oversee their education (52). According to Diotima, this creates stronger bonds than in a couple who shares “ordinary children” (52). She cites the poets Homer and Hesiod as well as the lawmakers Lycurgus and Solon as examples because their “children,” their poems and law codes, “themselves are immortal” (53). Such men “have even been awarded cults” due to their children’s immorality, something “no human child has ever yet earned for his father” (53).
Diotima did not know if Socrates was ready to “be initiated into the ways of love” (53), but she would tell him about them and see if he could keep up.
A young man should begin by “focusing on physical beauty,” loving “just one person’s body” and giving birth “in that medium to beautiful reasoning” (53). His next realization should be that “the beauty of all bodies” is “absolutely identical,” which should make him realize how “ridiculous and petty” loving one body is (53). From here, the young man can become attracted to “mental beauty” over physical, which will lead him to pursue “the kinds of reasoning which help young men’s moral progress” (53). This enables him to see the beauty in human “activities and institutions” and that physical beauty is not important (54). From this, he “must press on towards the things people know,” to find the beauty there too (54). At this point, he has ascended to the point that he can face “the vast sea of beauty” and give birth to “beautiful, expansive reasoning and thinking” that enables him to move to the next stage (54).
Encouraging Socrates to try his hardest “to pay attention,” Diotima explains that at this point, the young man can now see “a unique kind of knowledge” that is eternal and immutable and of a piece with all beautiful objects (54). The young man who achieves this is now in the presence of truth and can see the kind of beauty that creates “true goodness instead of phantom goodness” (55). He receives the gods’ favor and has the greatest potential to achieve immortality. Having concluded recounting what Diotima taught him, Socrates explains that he believes Love is the best partner in the humans striving to achieve immortality. This is why he believes Love should be treated “with reverence” and why he praises “Love’s power and courage” (56).
The first part of Socrates’s speech moves from him questioning Agathon to his and Diotima’s conversation. From the outset, Socrates does things in his own way. Unlike the other speeches, his speech is two conversations: one in which he questions Agathon and another in which he recalls Diotima’s explanation. Across his speech, Socrates brings education and mystery cult together, showing how the ritual of the dialogue can lead participants to improve their understanding and character.
Socrates’s questioning of Agathon leads them to agree that Love is desire, which can only exist for something that one does not already possess. Socrates uses Agathon’s own points to corner him such that he cannot refute Socrates’s conclusion and is forced to admit that he does not know what he thought he knew. After his questioning of Agathon, Socrates turns to a dialogue that he had with Diotima, who had questioned him. The shift reflects a microcosm of the dialogue that is the Symposium: It is Apollodorus telling a story that he heard from Aristodemus. Socrates’s speech is, in part, a story he heard from Diotima. The dialogue—the mystery rite of philosophy—is always ongoing and repeats eternally.
In conversation with Diotima, Socrates is forced to admit that Love exists in the middle ground between things, and as such, Love cannot be a god but must instead be a spirit (a daimon, or superhuman force). In answer to Socrates’s question about Love’s parents, Diotima tells him about Plenty and Poverty, which humans experience as opposites, but which are the two sides of Love. This establishes its dual identity, recalling the two natures that Pausanias referenced in his speech.
To Socrates’s next question regarding what humans gain from Love, Diotima notes that having good things makes people happy, and she and Socrates agree that this applies to all humans. With respect to Love, beauty has a part in it, but Love itself is for goodness and happiness, which humans want to have eternally, not temporarily. Thus, Diotima concludes that humans want to have some form of immortality.
Regarding the argument Socrates presents up to this point, philosophers have highlighted two transitions that may be called fallacious: the proposition that loving beauty assumes lack of beauty and the proposition that wanting to have something forever means wanting immortality. In the case of the former, Love is characterized as the force of desire. Thus, while the proposition may be flawed by philosophical standards, it reflects how ancients understood the concept of eros (the human state of being possessed by Eros). That Eros and eros are translated as “Love” and “love” is the translator making the best choice where an exact parallel is lacking.
The other proposition, concerning humans wanting immortality, reflects ancient Greek modes of thought. Mortal bodies are fragile and temporal, but mortals do not want to die. Epic and ritual can both be understood as mechanisms for humans to achieve immortality by being remembered. Thus, again, Plato is harnessing familiar institutions to promote his own hero, philosophy, through which teacher and student, lover and beloved, “give birth” to beautiful creations: self-discipline, wisdom, and justice.
As Diotima explains in the final section of Socrates’s speech, loving one person’s beauty may be a productive starting point for one’s initiation into Love’s mysteries but only because it leads one to realize how limited that view of Love is. This section is referred to as “Diotima’s Ladder” because she describes the process as ascending to greater heights. The language evokes the little that is known of the Eleusinian Mysteries, which began with a loss (here absence), led to a search, and concluded with an ascent.
By Plato