logo

24 pages 48 minutes read

Langston Hughes

Slave on the Block

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1933

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Harlem and the Harlem Renaissance

Harlem was one of several American cities in which Black populations dramatically increased during the Great Migration—the mass movement of Black people from the rural South to the North during the 1890s through the 1970s. This critical mass of Black people and their culture led to the Harlem Renaissance, an explosion of artistic and intellectual production during the 1910s and 1920s that transformed how Black people saw themselves.

Luther evolves from an unemployed former shoeshine to a Black man who stands up to the elder Mrs. Carraway and tells Anne to arrange her own roses. His evolution is a microcosm of the transformation in the stance of Black people in relation to white people during this period. During the Reconstruction period, most Black people lived in the rural South, where racial terrorists like the Ku Klux Klan were dominant. Under Jim Crow laws, Black people lived with the constant threat of being killed or otherwise harmed for violating racial norms. These circumstances forced them to subordinate their lives to the whims of white people, who saw their race as superior. Black people’s mobility and control over their own bodies did not even belong to them, reflecting their subordination.

A booming job market, industrialization, and weariness with Jim Crow laws convinced many Black people to abandon the South. People like Luther came North and in some instances found difficult living and economic conditions but also found a degree of freedom not available to them elsewhere. Like Mattie, long-term inhabitants of the city worked menial jobs by day but engaged with popular music and dance in Harlem clubs, at least those that did not cater exclusively to white patrons.

The artists who came to speak for this mass of Black people believed that it was the moment for them to claim the right to present themselves as beautiful and worthy of inclusion in American society. The list of Black people whom the Carraways have directly and indirectly met—W.E.B. DuBois, Countee Cullen, and Paul Robeson—is a who’s-who of people who played key roles in shaping the representation of Black people via work based in Harlem.

Hughes published his story in the 1930s—after the stock market crash of 1929, race riots, and enduring racial and economic inequities called into question art’s ability to change the political fortunes of Black people in America. The verbal conflict between Mattie and Luther on one side and Michael, Anne, and Mrs. Carraway on the other shows that a decade and a half of art and social encounters was not enough to undo hundreds of years of racism in America.

White Patronage and Cultural Appropriation

Like many Black artists during the Harlem Renaissance, Langston Hughes benefited from the support of white patrons who gave him funds to complete research and write for extended periods. Hughes’s most important patron in the years leading up to this story’s publication was Charlotte Osgood Mason, a white philanthropist who supported him. Osgood Mason served as Hughes’s patron with the understanding that she had ownership rights over his work—and that she fully expected him to produce work that reflected her belief in Black culture and people as unspoiled primitives in a decadent Western world. In a bid for autonomy, Hughes eventually broke with Osgood Mason. His rancor over her assertion of control over him—and his general rejection of white patrons’ efforts to control Black people and Black culture—appears as a theme in “Slave on the Block.”

The only artists in the story are Anne and Michael Carraway, but they’re also patrons. They see something of value in Black people and Black culture, and they collect Black art, including a “manuscript of Countee Cullen’s” (Paragraph 2). In addition, they consume Black cultural productions: “They saw all the plays with or about Negroes, read all the books, and adored the Hall Johnson Singers” (Paragraph 2). The Carraways believe that owning Black art is the same as owning Blackness—and they perceive greater proximity to Blackness as freeing.

The Carraways are vaguely aware that something is unseemly in their relation to Black art and culture. The first paragraph hints at this dim awareness with the pronouncement that their love of “dancing that had such jungle life about it, the songs that were so simple and fervent, the poetry that was so direct and real” wasn’t about attempting to “influence that art” (Paragraph 1). They “bought it and raved over it, and copied it” because doing so is part of what makes them “artists, too” (Paragraph 1). The description of Black art as simple and unsophisticated reflects the idea that Black people are inherently primitive, forever locked in the past, while the rest of the world moves on.

Although the Carraways appropriate Black art and style, like many patrons they’re less interested in the modern, living people who create and own that style. They instead consume Black culture and objectify the Black people they meet and employ. That explains why “[a]s much as they loved Negroes, Negroes didn’t seem to love Michael and Anne” (Paragraph 3). They never come to see their Black employees as people with their own will and character, even after the blow-up at the end of the story. Their attitude of paternalistic condescension persists to the end.

Liberal Racism and Paternalism

The Carraways’ desire to help Black people—and their preference for consuming Black culture—could charitably be the efforts of well-intentioned, socially, and politically liberal white people to engage with Black people in a historical moment when such encounters were still rare. Despite their self-proclaimed love of Black people, the Carraways’ actions—and the responses of the Black people with whom they interact—show that they function as racists.

Their racism is not the blunt, overtly white supremacist racism of Michael’s mother, who expects Black people to be servants and to jump at her command. Instead, it’s paternalism, a form of racism in which white people assert control over the autonomy of Black people out of a sense that white people can best make decisions about Black people’s lives, culture, and representation.

The reader sees this form of racism in the painting Boy on the Block and Michael’s musical composition. Anne forces Luther to surrender control over his body and self-representation because she thinks that doing so will allow her to create an authentic picture of “the full soul and sorrow of his people” (Paragraph 30). Luther doesn’t care to pose for her. He sleeps during their sessions, doesn’t show up for them for three days at one point, and is embarrassed to pose nude in front of her. She’s oblivious to his perspective, however.

Michael’s creation of a sonata inspired by Anne’s painting reveals that he shares her paternalistic perspective. Michael is clueless that what he produces is wearisome to Luther, who escapes to Harlem after hours of posing. Because Michael has little understanding of the culture that produced Luther, Michael’s sonata sounds “like ‘Deep River’ [a Black spiritual] in the jaws of a dog” instead of how Michael describes it:  

[It’s a] modern slave plaint, 1850 in terms of 1933. Vieux Carré [a Creole neighborhood in the New Orleans French Quarter, associated with the Old South] remembered on 135th Street. Slavery in the Cotton Club [a Harlem Club that had decorative plantation motifs and allowed only White patrons] (Paragraph 30).

Michael’s ugly artistic creation places Black culture and people firmly in the past, overlaid with a nostalgic take on the slave South that Luther and Mattie reject.

Luther is something more than the Carraways can envision, however. By the end of the story, he is a dandily dressed sophisticate who knows how to arrange flowers and dance the Lindy Hop. After Michael fires him, Mattie explains angrily that she has grown tired of being made to pose after a long day of work and of the Carraway’s belief that it is appropriate to enter her bedroom after one o’ clock in the morning. Her demand that the Carraways pay her and Luther is an assertion of the value of their lives outside the whims and demands of the Carraways. She feels dehumanized and oppressed by their constant violations of her private life. The responses of the Carraways—Michael agrees to pay them, Anne laments her unfinished painting, and Mrs. Carraway simply harumphs—shows that all three are unable to see Luther and Mattie on the Black couple’s own terms.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text