80 pages • 2 hours read
Patrick Radden KeefeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Many, though not all, of Keefe’s subjects are people with extraordinary financial resources or proximity to them. Koch’s world of hobbies like elite wine collecting is that of the very rich: One wine expert admits not writing about Rodenstock’s wines because the vintages are inaccessible to most consumers. Koch is able to regard the fraudulent wine as a “detective story” (4) and hire his own detective to solve the case. Rodenstock’s frauds depend on that same wealth: Collectors like Koch rarely consume what they own, which makes discovery less likely. Similarly, Steven Cohen’s personal fortune is largely untouched by the case of insider trading at SAC that Keefe describes. When personal wealth is combined with the savvy to avoid self-incrimination, it shields its owners from consequences.
Keefe also presents episodes where wealth does not produce freedom or preserve emotional bonds. Wim Holleeder’s small Heineken ransom fortune leads to his later decision to murder his rivals, including former close ally Cor Van Hout. His wealth may have made him a folk hero, but his conduct sufficiently repels his sister Astrid that she betrays him rather than depend on his largesse. Likewise, Chapo Guzmán’s drug empire made him rich, but the isolation demanded by protective security proved untenable, both for his personal preferences and the future security of his organization. In another example, Monzer al-Kassar may have lived lavishly, hosting elaborate parties, but Keefe points out that even princes experience economic setbacks. Al-Kassar may have been susceptible to the 2008 sting operation because he “had been struggling to obtain his profit margins” (254).
The generation of wealth produces the drive for more wealth, and this explains, in part, al-Kassar’s downfall. Mark Burnett, and by extension, Donald Trump, pursue wealth as the chief goal of their work. But, Keefe suggests that both occupy a shared realm of moral bankruptcy, where a “carnival barker” (177) came to wield immense, and perhaps unearned, power. Finally, Hervé Falciani claims to seek a world where those with money are not immune from their ethical obligations by uncovering the extent of tax evasion that the Swiss banking sector enables. He admits, however, that the effects of his intervention are likely to be limited—the banking sector is more interested in preserving power than curbing its excesses. In most of Keefe’s narratives, the wealthy may be inconvenienced, but ordinary people face more lasting tragedies and inequities.
While Keefe’s longform journalism essays are stories in their own right, many of his subjects also evince a remarkable storytelling capacity. This runs the gamut from a professional skill, as in the case of Mark Burnett, Anthony Bourdain, or Judy Clarke, to self-justification, as in the case of Matthew Martoma, to public mythology, for figures like Monzer al-Kassar, Hervé Falciani, and former president Donald Trump, among others.
In the case of the more professional storytellers in Keefe’s essay collection, it becomes apparent that a desire to reach the public can be laudable or morally dubious, depending on the goals. Judy Clarke acts entirely out of ideological conviction, earning herself the nickname “Saint Judy, on the basis of her humility, her generosity, and her devotion to her clients” (259). Anthony Bourdain’s storytelling capacity is the fulfillment of a personal dream, but he becomes a national icon and celebrity within and outside the culinary world. Keefe argues that Bourdain’s focus on food became a kind of public good at critical moments: For example, his TV show garnered significant ratings in the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombings because people “needed a break” (338) from chaos and tragedy. Though Ken Dornstein’s obsession may strike readers as unhealthy, his impulse to document his brother’s life and his quest for truth are profound acts of love. Mark Burnett’s storytelling skills and eye for drama created a new television phenomenon. But even a show like Survivor may be less anodyne than it appears, as Keefe interviews a psychologist who stopped working with Burnett “in part because he feared a contestant might harm himself” (181). In interviews, former Apprentice contestants underscore that they feel Burnett’s harm has become national in scope thanks to the Trump presidency.
In the cases of known or alleged criminals in Keefe’s work, self-construction may be an attempt to convince an audience of innocence, or, at least, distract from harsher realities with spectacle. Before his sister’s tell-all book, Wim Holleeder successfully cultivated a public image as a “huggable criminal” (37). Hervé Falciani portrays himself as a crusader for justice and transparency, largely successfully, despite the doubts of his former partner. Monzer al al-Kassar ostentatiously displays his wealth along with his devotion to family. Matthew Martoma insists that he only faked his grades in Harvard Law School out of filial devotion, not a real intent to deceive; in response, his family sees him as a persecuted man, the victim of Steven Cohen and Sidney Gilman. Keefe’s suggestion that Martoma chooses prison over a guilty plea to avoid confronting the distance between his behavior and this image is the ultimate cautionary tale in self-deception. While the world of Rogues is often one of political and financial power, Keefe’s subjects are all acutely aware that such conventional and material resources are even more potent with a compelling narrative attached, however dubious its veracity may be.
Though Keefe’s 12 principal subjects would seem to have little in common—they comprise many nationalities, occupations, classes, and political views—many of them are driven by ties to their families, even against their better judgment. Astrid Holleeder tells Keefe that she is “still communicating” (49) with her brother even after her choice to betray him and years of silence between them. Amy Bishop similarly tells Keefe and others that she is in regular communication with her deceased brother, Seth. Depending upon one’s view of Bishop, this either imparts humanity to a mass murderer, or makes her appear even more sinister. Keefe’s more self-destructive protagonists, and their advocates, cite family bonds as part of the driving force behind their decisions. Judy Bishop’s friends stand behind her account of Seth’s accidental death because they know the alternatives are too difficult for her to contemplate: Judy Bishop still thinks of Amy as a “good girl” (148) and cannot face Keefe’s alternative account of Seth’s death.
Judy Clarke argues that only a strong sibling bond could have driven Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to become a mass bomber, though the jury in the case rejects her view of the events. Sidney Gilman blames his grief and despair over loss of his son for his susceptibility to Matthew Martoma’s charms and willingness to provide his protégé with confidential information. Matthew Martoma cites a desire to please his parents as the impetus behind his creation of a false transcript of his law school grades. Martoma’s father blames himself for his son’s arrest, suggesting that devotion gone wrong, not the desire for money, was the impetus behind his son’s behavior.
Even Keefe’s accounts of loving families are marked by deep attachment in the face of loss: Ken Dornstein can only be devoted to his brother’s memory due to David’s early death. Anthony Bourdain’s account of his devotion to his daughter acquires a tragic tinge when today’s reader knows that he died by suicide. In the world of Rogues, the reader meets families changed by extraordinary circumstances, pushed beyond their limits into worlds few of them anticipated.
The activities of the many convicted or suspected criminals in this volume all depend, to some degree, on the support, tolerance, or cooperation of those within socially-sanctioned and legitimated institutions, whether social, legal, or governmental. This often happens because confident men and criminals are charming and knowledgeable about those they seek to impress. Hardy Rodenstock’s wine forgeries depend upon his ability to influence the entire industry, including the venerable Christie’s auction house. Discrediting him, Keefe notes, would require wine expert Broadbent to weather a “considerable blow” (17) to his own reputation. Astrid Holleeder finds that her best career path as an attorney is the world of criminal defense, where her family’s reputation would be an advantage rather than a deficit. In his examinations of the narcotics trade and the world of arms dealing, Keefe points out that both enterprises depend on legitimate businesses for social and logistical support. The local economy in parts of Mexico depends on the money that drug kingpins launder into legitimate businesses. Similarly, legitimate governments depend on arms from those like Monzer al-Kassar. Moreover, al-Kassar’s knowledge makes him invaluable to those in power: The Spanish government supports him as an asset to its foreign intelligence. Hervé Falciani commits the crime of data theft to expose the crime of tax fraud, but what may be more shocking about his revelations are the legal means the rich employ to keep assets hidden: Shell corporations for the purposes of keeping assets out of the reach of tax authorities are easily formulated within many countries, including the United States. Finally, underdeveloped countries with natural resources are ripe for the machinations of international investors, whose ethical lapses encourage and profit from weak legal systems and widespread corruption. In the case of Guinea, Beny Steinmetz’s history of shady dealings with previous administrations eventually can’t help but entangle and bring down incoming leader Alpha Condé, regardless of the latter’s promises to target corruption and focus on transparency.
Keefe also points to the unstable border between crime and ordinary life by comparing those who benefit from crime, those who choose it unexpectedly, and the rare cases when people turn away from it. The Heineken kidnapping enabled the entire Holleeder family to materially benefit from the proceeds of the crime, made possible at least in part by their love and fear of Wim. Astrid calls it a personal turning point and also recognizes it as her tacit enabling of Wim’s later crimes and empire-building in the Dutch underworld. Sonja Holleeder still lives her quiet, ordinary life on this money, because no one has forced her or anyone else to return it. Amy Bishop, like Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, chooses mass murder over ordinary life. Ken Dornstein emerges as an outlier, as he rejects his hidden camera in favor of personal transparency in his interviews and conversations, even if it costs him the answers he seeks. He does the same when he rejects the help of an Islamist group to interview his chief suspect. Keefe’s profiles in Rogues are a journalistic version of what Judy Clarke engages in for her criminal cases: Both seek to understand how notorious people become who they are. To do so, Keefe posits, is to learn that the boundary between the quotidian and the notorious is always easier to cross than one might think.
By Patrick Radden Keefe
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Brothers & Sisters
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Journalism Reads
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
SuperSummary Staff Picks
View Collection
The Best of "Best Book" Lists
View Collection
True Crime & Legal
View Collection
Trust & Doubt
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
YA Mystery & Crime
View Collection
YA Nonfiction
View Collection