logo

80 pages 2 hours read

Patrick Radden Keefe

Rogues: True Stories of Grifters, Killers, Rebels and Crooks

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2022

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Essay 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Essay 3 Summary: “The Avenger”

The essay begins in 1988, with the breaking news of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, a deadly terrorist attack over Lockerbie, Scotland, that killed all the passengers and flight crew on board. Keefe’s subject, Ken Dornstein, learned after reading the headlines that his brother David was on the plane. Dornstein was gutted by his brother’s loss, mourning his thwarted aspirations for a writing career.

Dornstein became quietly obsessed with the “murder mystery” (55) of the Pan Am tragedy—though it was later determined the bomb was in the luggage hold, the identity of those who built the bomb or placed it on board remains unknown. He found it a relief when he unexpectedly fell in love with and married Kathryn Geismar, an ex-girlfriend of David’s, as she understood the event that now defined him.

Early official investigations of the bombing and the Department of Justice’s initial findings implicated Libyan intelligence. In the 1980s, Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, however, denied responsibility for Lockerbie, and the accused did not stand international trial until 1998. After one intelligence agent was convicted, Qaddafi set up a victims’ compensation fund and tacitly admitted potential Libyan culpability. For his part, Dornstein believed there had to be more to the case, wondering “how could such a big act of mass murder have no author?” (56).

Dornstein became an investigative journalist, and in 2006 he wrote a book about David’s life and death. In 2011, he had the unexpected chance to go to Libya and seek answers, as the fall of Qaddafi’s government meant travel there would be safer for an American. Hoping to make a documentary film about his quest, Dornstein financed his journey to Libya with proceeds from the victim’s compensation fund, hiring an experienced cameraman. Dornstein had a list of likely suspects, but found that many of them had died in the tumult of Libya’s violent regime change. The one convicted Lockerbie suspect, Abdelset al-Megrahi, was living in Tripoli after compassionate release from prison, and Dornstein was furious when he refused a meeting. During these investigations, Dornstein began wearing a wire during his interviews, hoping to acquire definitive evidence.

More digging led Dornstein to a Swiss electronics expert named Bollier, who at one time testified about his travel to Libya during the lead up to the bombing. Dornstein was particularly drawn to one detail from Bollier’s initial interviews—Bollier’s meeting with a “very dark skinned” “colonel” in Libya (63). Dornstein found a declassified document revealing that Megrahi had traveled with a man matching that description, whose passport identified him as Abu Agila Ma’sud. Researching previous Libyan bombings in Europe, Dornstein found references to Ma’sud’s previous role in a 1986 Berlin bombing at a discotheque called La Belle. He used this to track down another La Belle bombing participant, Musbah Eter, hoping to confirm his role in Lockerbie. While pursuing these leads, Dornstein decided to discard his hidden camera, ashamed of his subterfuge.

In his conversations with Dornstein, Keefe focuses on Dornstein’s quest to confront the perpetrators and his drive to tell them, “I know what you did” (69). Dornstein is partly inspired by learning David had done the same before his death, confronting a man who had sexually abused him. Though Dornstein sometimes doubts his quest, and some of his own family considers it unhealthy, he continues his efforts.

Dornstein eventually discovers footage of the man he is likely seeking in Libya in 2012 with another Pan Am suspect; his sources confirm that the man is likely the bomber Ma’sud. At this stage, Dornstein realizes that apprehending or meeting Ma’sud would now be more difficult, as Libya’s political situation has deteriorated since Dornstein’s first trip. This means his documentary about David will not contain footage of his new evidence. More searching reveals that Ma’sud is in prison in Libya. As Dornstein accepts the impossibility of more proof, the Islamist group Libya Dawn offers him passage into the country to meet Ma’sud. He ultimately decides it is too dangerous, though the idea clearly tempts him.

Keefe interviews a former federal prosecutor who stresses that Dornstein’s success is not due to government incompetence, but rather the latitude afforded to journalists that government officials lack. Keefe closes by wondering if the documentary, or any single strand of evidence, will ever end Dornstein’s efforts. His wife assumes that “maybe this is a door that never gets closed” (78). In his brief afterword, Keefe indicates that Dornstein has since moved on to other projects.

Essay 3 Analysis

The story of Ken and David Dornstein allows Keefe to showcase The Importance of Family Bonds from the perspective of the innocent and suffering. Ken Dornstein focuses first on his brother as a storyteller and aspiring author, before intentionally taking on the role himself, struck by the narrative challenge of telling a story where there seems to be no clear antagonist—David’s story has many victims, but no named perpetrators. Dornstein presents narrativity as its own moral act, playing into the theme of The Power of Narrative and Image, since only by completing the story can he confront the perpetrator and remind him of the consequences of his choices. Pursuit of the truth is more important than retribution.

Like Astrid Holleeder, Ken Dornstein is haunted by guilt—but his is the guilt of the survivor, not the traitor. This is epitomized in his relentless quest to remember his brother. Dornstein’s investigation forces him to rely on sources that might be regarded as corrupt or beyond redemption: former terrorist Eter, who has since reformed, and a Swiss watch-maker who shows little remorse for his collaboration with Qaddafi’s regime. Dornstein briefly compromises his own ethics in his quest for truth, recording Eter without his consent. Dornstein’s decision to repudiate his hidden camera underlines his discomfort with deception, and his refusal to participate in The Overlap Between Corruption, Wrongdoing, and Everyday Life. He uncovers a world where the legal and the illegal meet, but does not dwell in it. This is underlined further by his rejection of an Islamist group’s offer to go to Tripoli, as he chooses his family over political entanglement and possible danger.

Dornstein’s quest also raises questions about the nature of obligation and its toll on mental health. If the Holleeder siblings show how family bonds can be distorted by abuse and trauma, Dornstein’s story is perhaps its own cautionary tale. Keefe’s 2022 note that Dornstein’s work now involves other subjects suggests, however, that healthy sibling bonds offer more hope than dysfunctional ones, even when marred by tragedy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text