logo

32 pages 1 hour read

Plato

Protagoras

Nonfiction | Essay / Speech | Adult | Published in 390

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Index of Terms

Courage

At the end of the dialogue, Socrates defines courage as the virtue that entails wisdom about what is and is not properly frightening. This definition surprises Protagoras for several reasons, not least of which is that Socrates’s pointed questions revealed that this must be the case, based on Protagoras’s own views. Courage does not seem to be discussed for its own sake but as an example that shows the potential for inherent connection among the virtues. In this case, wisdom and courage, two of the five cardinal virtues, are intimately connected. This is in contrast to Protagoras’s hypothesis that courage is different from the other cardinal virtues, since some people possess courage but do not possess wisdom, moderation, piety, or justice. Socrates shows that this is not so. 

Socratic Method

This is a method of philosophical inquiry that Socrates commonly employs to corral his interlocutors (including Hippocrates, Protagoras, and Prodicus) into accepting claims they may have originally found outlandish. Socrates generally builds to the unexpected (i.e., ironic) result through a series of questions. Most of these questions invite a simple yes or no response. The answers to the questions generally seem obvious, and the interlocutor responds with the expected answer, usually an affirmation of Socrates’s view. After a long series of answers that seem non-problematic, Socrates shows how these assertions entail another proposition that is less obvious. For instance, in the Protagoras, Socrates uses the Socratic method to teach Hippocrates that he should not rush into apprenticeship with Protagoras. Similarly, he uses the method to show Protagoras that courage and wisdom are not nearly so dissimilar as Protagoras thought. The nature of the method is such that Protagoras, who is a willing participant in the methodological inquiry, cannot help but agree to the unexpected conclusion.

Sophistry

Sophistry was an art of rhetoric, argumentation, and dialectical skill practiced in ancient Greece. Sophists, of whom Protagoras, Prodicus, and Hippias are all famous examples, traveled across the Greek-speaking world offering their services for money. By the time Plato was active in fifth-century BCE Athens, the practice of sophistry had fallen into disrepute. Plato and Socrates express disdain for sophists, and Socrates always refuses the label. Now, the term sophistry refers to a self-important manner of philosophizing that neglects truth in favor of rhetorical style. In the Protagoras, sophistry is contrasted with philosophy. The leading sophist, Protagoras, is exposed as fraudulent by the protagonist-philosopher, Socrates. The sophist appeals to appearance, but the philosopher appeals to realities. The volume Socrates and the Sophists, translated and edited by Joe Sachs, includes the Protagoras and several other Platonic dialogues that explore this issue. 

Wisdom

Wisdom is one of the five cardinal virtues in many of Plato’s writings. Although it is never explicitly defined in the Protagoras, wisdom seems deeply connected to the art of measurement, a skill by which a person correctly judges the relative value of different goods. In this dialogue, Socrates argues for the similarity between wisdom and moderation and the necessity of wisdom for courage. This implies the centrality of wisdom in any scheme of the unity of the virtues. Wisdom is both a central theme of the discussion between Socrates and Protagoras and a reason for it. It is Hippocrates’s rash excitement for the acquisition of wisdom that prompts the discussion.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text