logo

37 pages 1 hour read

Plato

Phaedrus

Nonfiction | Essay / Speech | Adult

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Key Figures

Socrates

Socrates is the main speaker in the dialogue, and he largely controls the direction that the conversation between Phaedrus and himself takes. He sets off the conversation by requesting to hear the speech of Lysias that Phaedrus is carrying, and then tries to improve on that speech in several ways. In attempting to argue the same position more effectively (his first speech), he shows himself to be a more effective speaker than Lysias; in attempting to argue the opposite (his second speech), he shows himself to be much more imaginative in his use of myths and allegories. Socrates shows a meticulous concern for beginning at the root of a problem, making his definitions and assumptions clear before reasoning any further.

As a character, he frequently claims to know little or nothing, a point which, even if true, contrasts ironically with his insistence on clarity in thought and his love of knowledge. He feels a particular duty to gods and spirits, even claiming to receive a supernatural sign that prevents him from leaving Phaedrus without having sufficiently praised the god of Love. His insistence that he really knows very little is perhaps genuine or perhaps falsely modest; in either case, it helps him escape responsibility for whatever consequences his speeches may have. This is also true of his claims that the local gods and spirits are inspiring him: if they are, the speeches are not really his invention and cannot be held against him. Ultimately, though, some of his speeches seem much more genuine and elaborate than others, especially his defense of love as divine madness, with its intricate allegory of the soul.It is difficult to pin down exactly where he stands on several questions, as he sets for himself the task of arguing both sides.

Phaedrus

Though it may seem at first glance that Phaedrus’s role in the dialogue is simply to provide an audience for Socrates, Plato develops him further. Phaedrus is clearly interested in good writing and speaking, and holds a high opinion of Lysias. That he has retained a copy of Lysias’s speech from the night before the dialogue takes place shows his intent to study it further. Socrates often praises Phaedrus, rightly or not, as a great speaker, a lover of knowledge, and the inspiration for Socrates’s own musings on the meaning of love, the types of divine inspiration, and the qualities of effective rhetoric. Like Socrates, Phaedrus makes appearances as a character in other dialogues by Plato. He is an historical character, but little is known about his life.

Lysias

Lysias, the son of Cephalus, is the writer of the speech that Phaedrus has just heard when he meets Socrates at the opening of the dialogue, a speech that Lysias rereads in its entirety at Socrates’s request. Lysias was a resident of late 5th-century BC Athens, but it is unknown whether his speech in Phaedrus is historical or an invention of Plato’s. In any case, his speech as fuel for the discussion of Socrates and Phaedrus makes up the entire dialogue: the first half is concerned with the premise of his speech (that is, “Is a man not in love superior to a man in love?”) while the second half is concerned with the effectiveness of his rhetoric. Though Phaedrus describes Lysias as “the best writer living” (22) at the outset of the dialogue, Socrates does not seem to hold a very high opinion of Lysias’s skill as a writer or as a thinker. His speech serves mainly as a foil against which Socrates can propose his own ideas, which are much more colorful, poetic, and entertaining. There is nothing in the speech of Lysias comparable to Socrates’s myths and allegories, and Lysias (in his speech) does not claim to be divinely inspired, as Socrates suggests himself to be.

Isocrates

Isocrates is a disciple of Socrates; Phaedrus and Socrates speak of him at the very close of the dialogue as someone who shows great potential as a speaker and philosopher. Socrates believes he will develop into a great practitioner of the principles of the rhetoric, which they discuss in the dialogue’s second half, as well as a careful thinker and skilled writer.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text