107 pages • 3 hours read
J. F. BierleinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Bierlein opens his preface by arguing that myths are everywhere in our daily lives and that by understanding them, we understand ourselves. While popularized in recent literature, film, and television, most scholarship on the subject is not “reader friendly.” Bierlein’s goal is to change that. He includes not only the familiar Greek and Norse myths, but those of Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Oceania. The importance of myth, he argues, is to show humanity its commonalities even across what we perceive as wide cultural gaps.
Bierlein opens Part 1 with a poem by 19th-century American lawyer and writer
Robert G. Ingersoll. In his “Invitation to Myth,” Ingersoll lays out a bleak picture of humanity’s existence:
Life is a narrow vale between the cold
And barren peaks of two eternities.
We strive in vain to look beyond the height, We cry aloud;
the only answer
Is the echo of our wailing cry (1).
Humanity’s only recourse in the face of existential despair, Ingersoll argues, is to create myths that give meaning to our lives and give gods “the faults and frailties” of human beings. Myths give not only meaning but beauty to a world that can too often seem cruel and capricious.
Bierlein recounts a Chinese creation myth. When Hu, the Emperor of the Northern Sea, and Shu, the Emperor of the Southern Sea, discover Hundun, “a great chaos” (3), they pierce him with thunderbolts for seven days to create orifices in which to allow light to penetrate. In the process, Hundun dies. In this myth, creation begins when lightning penetrates chaos.
In a striking echo of this creation myth, chemistry graduate student Stanley L. Miller in 1953 performed an experiment in which gasses believed to have composed early Earth’s atmosphere were charged with electricity. The result was the formation of nucleotides, early building blocks of DNA. Bierlein writes, “This was the first time that nucleotides had been produced in any manner independent of a living organism” (4). The myth and the experiment converge in fundamental ways: Both posit, in their own ways, the beginning of life on Earth.
A common definition of “myth” is an untruth or falsehood, but in a cultural context, myth represents the purest of truths. Myths are the most primal form of religion, philosophy, government, and morality. In very general terms, myths are:
Subsection 1 Summary: “Language and Myth”
The English language is filled with mythological references, especially Greek and Roman: chaos, museum, erotic, Nike, Mars, and Venus, to name a few. These words provide a link to our past through the cultural connection of myth. Many cultures have words that describe that indefinable truth beyond human comprehension, and those words frequently carry over into that culture’s contemporary language, often translating to “God.” Those gods were frequently anthropomorphized—Greek gods took human form, and the Jewish prohibition against “graven images” was a refutation of this tendency; by refusing to see their god as similar to themselves, they created a hierarchy with God above and humans below.
The connection between language and myth is deep. In some cultures—Persian and Jewish, for example—simply speaking the name of God is a profanity. Maintaining ancient linguistic traditions—the Latin Mass in Catholicism or Muslims reciting the Koran in Arabic—separates “what is sacred from what is profane” (10). Returning to the origin language of the myth preserves its sacred integrity. Language also evolves alongside humans’ relationship with their god(s). In its earliest stages, the god is all-powerful, and humans must appease it, the language reflecting that relationship. As it evolves into a more codependent relationship, language reflects that as well: “the Great Self” in the Hindu faith or, in Christianity, the notion of God dwelling “within” the individual.
Subsection 2 Summary: “Time and Myth”
Our current way of measuring time—the solar year, for example—has its origins in Egyptian mythology. In many languages, the days of the week are based on myths: Friday is sacred to the Germanic goddess of beauty, Freya, and Sunday is a day sacred to the Sun. Similarly, the months are derived from classical mythology: January is named after Janus, “two-faced Roman god of the gates who faced backward and forward” (14), and April comes from the Latin aprire (“to open”), the month when many flowers blossom.
Bierlein makes a distinction between “sacred time” and “profane time,” the latter referring simply to clock and calendar time while the former represents a “connection, the sense of timelessness within time” (16). Myths—and religious rituals are part of the mythological structure humans observe—connect past, present, and future. The Christian Mass and the Jewish Sabbath both illustrate such a connection, the rites connecting acolytes through millennia of similar practice.
Subsection 3 Summary: “History and Myth”
Only recently have human beings separated myth and history as two distinct disciplines. To “primitive man,” they were tightly intertwined, all human activity being a replay—and thus, a connection—to its mythical past. History, as defined today, is a discreet series of events and actors that have beginning and end points in chronological time. In essence, traditional cultures view history as “cyclical” while contemporary cultures view it as “linear.”
Subsection 4 Summary: “The Civic Myth”
Myths, in the form of national symbols, can also act as the “glue” that binds nations, especially ethnically diverse nations that may not share a common language or culture. In the United States, such symbols are, among others, the flag, the Statue of Liberty, and the icons found on national currency. In ancient Rome, the emperor was considered a symbol of unity; failure to worship him as such could carry severe consequences. Conversely, when those myths break down, so does social cohesion. The exile of the Jews in the Old Testament for failing to adhere to God’s covenant is one example.
Subsection 5 Summary: “Morality and Myth”
The association of morality and religion has a long and entrenched history, so much so that it becomes nearly impossible to separate them in the public imagination. The loss of connection to myth and religion, therefore, means a loss of morality. Moral relativism is a symptom of this decline. According to Bierlein, “The establishment and maintenance of a widely held moral code are the most important functions of myth” (22). Without the acknowledgement of a common morality—based on a set of common myths—social order devolves into violence and chaos.
Subsection 6 Summary: “The Sense of the Sacred”
Bierlein cites a German tale, Berufs-Trajik (“Vocation Tragedy”), in which a mighty bridge is built over an estuary on the Baltic Sea. It is an engineering marvel. Tremendous obstacles are confronted and overcome, and the bridge is completed, only to be swept away in a cyclone. Visiting the sight of the tragedy, the author is compelled to kneel in the face of such a great, existential mystery, a mystery that dwarfs both humans and their accomplishments.
Subsection 1 Summary: “The Greek and Roman Pantheon”
The “Olympian Twelve” are the major Greek gods/goddesses who dwelt atop Mount Olympus. Their Roman counterparts are designated in parentheses.
The Earth Gods
Interestingly, the inclusion of Demeter and Dionysus in the Pantheon illustrates the importance of grain and wine in Greek society.
Subsection 2 Summary: “The Norse Pantheon”
Subsection 3 Summary: “The Gods of India”
Religious mythology in India is both monotheistic and polytheistic. While Brahman is considered the Creator and the “Divine Self” in a monotheistic context, he also manifests as a trinity: Brahman, Vishnu (the Preserver), and Shiva (the Destroyer). The trinity also has female incarnations (“shaktis”) that are worshipped by some Hindu sects: Brahman’s shakti is Sarasvati, and Vishnu’s is Lakshmi.
Other Hindu deities are:
Subsection 4 Summary: “The Egyptian Pantheon”
Subsection 5 Summary: “The Hawaiian Pantheon”
Hawaiian, Tahitian, Maori, and other Polynesian mythologies recognize two primordial forces of nature:
There are also:
Subsection 6 Summary: “The Aztec Pantheon”
Lesser Aztec Gods
Ever since Joseph Campbell’s popular series of interviews with Bill Moyers, the term myth has acquired a cultural gravitas far beyond the middle school “Mount Olympus” curriculum. As Campbell explored and explained the cross-cultural overlap in global mythologies, he described a world of far more similarities than differences. His study of myth and archetypes articulated a profound, unconscious truth that, judging by the popularity of the series, touched a collective nerve. While Bierlein plows some of the same familiar ground as Campbell, he aims to make his work more accessible to a mainstream audience. The power of myth, he argues, is its relevance and its ability to teach us about ourselves and our past, present, and future. Much of how we reckon our modern existence is based in our mythology—how we measure time, how we construct our systems of government and codes of acceptable behavior. He even argues that, as we have lost touch with the importance of myth—replaced by a secular faith in science—society has suffered with rising crime, addiction, and wayward youth. What he is suggesting is a loss of a common, defining bond, a moral compass that points a society in the same direction. Without that guiding light, society is beset by a relativism that allows everyone to decide their own individual moral code. The result can only be chaos, like the primordial void of which so many creation myths speak.
As Bierlein catalogues the deities of various cultures, what emerges is a stunning similarity. While some ancient societies have culturally specific gods—Kubera, the Hindu god of wealth, or Pele, the Polynesian volcano goddess—the overlap is quite broad. Nearly every culture has a Supreme Being (Onteotl, Ra, Zeus, Odin), a goddess of love, beauty, and sexual desire (Bast, Freya, Aphrodite, Isis, Tlatzoteotl), and a god/goddess of the natural world, be it the sun (Ra, Ao, Apollo) or the sky (Shu and his daughter Nut, Indra, Ehecatl). Gods of war, fertility, and agriculture are also prominent. These parallels suggest that early civilizations, pre-Enlightenment, had to find ways to explain the random beauty and cruelty of the world, and they did so in remarkably similar ways. The fact that so many cultures across such vast distances with little or no contact with each other would describe their surroundings in such comparable, personified terms suggests either a cognitive similarity in the way the human brain processes information or perhaps something less tangible—a shared connection to what psychoanalyst Carl Jung termed “the collective unconscious,” a deep, subconscious understanding of the world and its truths, an understanding not learned but innate in all people.