50 pages • 1 hour read
Mary RoachA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Chapter 10 focuses on the Gemini VII two-week mission with Jim Lovell and Frank Borman in 1965. One of the scientific inquiries at that time was the effect of wearing a spacesuit fulltime without bathing or showering. Scientists at the Aerospace Medical Research Lab at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base analyzed the body odor and skin condition of test subjects who wore spacesuits and helmets and refrained from cleansing and grooming for two to six weeks. Unsurprisingly, pungent body odor became an issue, but around day ten, the odor plateaued. Roach recounts several theories to explain the plateau, including limiting factors to bacteria growth, and Weber’s Law, which states that changes in a smell’s intensity are less noticeable when the odor is already at a heightened state.
In addition to body odor, scientists studied sebum, the oily secretions by hair follicles. Clothes were able to absorb these secretions, and according to some studies, the body reached a balance and stopped sebum production after five days. Roach questions whether modern Americans obsess over cleanliness. She considers the hygiene habits of Queen Elizabeth I, who bathed once a month, and the plight of nurses with skin chafed from repeated handwashing.
Roach highlights astronaut Frank Borman’s reluctance to update Mission Control on the condition of his skin, attributing his irritation with the topics of dry lips and lotion to a macho rejection of skincare. During the Gemini VII flight, Lovell and Borman alternated having their suit off, since Mission Control required that one astronaut always wear a suit. By the sixth day, the authorities relented and allowed both men to remove their spacesuits.
Roach interviews volunteers at the Flight Analogs Research Unit (FARU) at the University of Texas, part of a NASA bed-rest study in which participants spent three months in bed to simulate gravity’s degrading effects on bone and muscle mass. Dubbed “terranauts” (214), the volunteers were a mix of individuals: Some had joined the trial for the money ($17,000 total), others for the sake of science.
Gravity deteriorates bone mass; preventive measures, such as exercising, are difficult to perform in zero gravity. The weakening of bones is a significant problem for a Mars mission: A two-year mission could reduce bone mass by as much as half. For astronauts who returned to Earth after a long period, bone regrowth proved slow and partial, leaving the hip bone vulnerable to fractures. Roach is surprised to learn about a study that attempted to stimulate hip bone growth by purposefully and repeatedly having test subjects fall on their sides.
Research on bears also intrigues Roach: These animals redistribute calcium from their blood and do not lose bone mass after months of hibernation. Roach mentions the popularity of hibernation chambers in science fiction, and asks scientist John Charles whether NASA intends on developing such technology. Charles acknowledges space agencies’ fascination with cryosleep, but does not regard it as an efficient option. The chambers could malfunction, and the savings of packing fewer supplies wouldn’t balance out the risks and costs of developing the technology. Roach is also skeptical that consuming the necessary stores of fat would be healthy for humans.
Sex in space is just as implausible as it is impossible. The closest references to sex Roach finds in NASA and ISS documents are code of conduct statements that disapprove of inappropriate behavior or preferential treatment. Without much data to analyze, Roach spends a portion of the chapter debunking several hoaxes. A pornographic film claimed to have shot a sex scene in zero gravity, but after watching all three movies in the series, Roach discovers that the actors feigned weightlessness. She also disproves claims of dolphin threesomes (a third dolphin does not help with the pushing) and NASA experiments with underwater copulation, which never took place.
Though Roach finds very little information on whether sexual intercourse has ever occurred in space, she does discover some research on fertility and reproduction. She learns that the human penis does not benefit from an extra blood flow in zero gravity, but bull sperm move faster in space. One study sent pregnant rats into space. When they returned and gave birth, uterine contractions were weaker after the flight and reduced the stimulation of necessary stress hormones. Dr. April Ronca, the scientist who conducted the rat study, admits that little is known about reproduction in space partly because of lack of interest and funding. Roach points out in a footnote and in the chapter’s conclusion that institutional sexism plays a role in the lack of research on obstetrics and space.
These chapters focus on how space impacts the body in relation to hygiene, bone mass, and sex—topics that echo Roach’s earlier books, which explore the human body from a variety of typically off-limits perspectives. For instance, a previous publication, Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex (2008), details her research into sexual physiology and anatomy. In contrast, its taboo on even discussing astronaut sexual behavior suggests that NASA is a reserved and conservative institution. Roach thus elicits a critique of the idea of taboos, not only speaking openly about sex, but gleefully watching pornography. Her digressive investigation of a pornographic film supposedly set in zero gravity posits that all aspects of a subject matter are suitable for study, and her inquisitiveness challenges stereotypes of acceptable feminine behavior.
In her discussions of the body, Roach illustrates the ways that gender stereotypes continue in the new frontier of space exploration. She notes how, for at least one astronaut, questions about dry lips and lotion were at odds with his concept of masculinity. Roach uses the term “macho” (204) to describe Frank Bowman’s tone in his irritated replies to Mission Control, as if caring about the condition of his skin would be “compromising the whole manliness of the mission” (200). The dismissal of grooming and skincare, activities that stereotypically connote vanity and conventional femininity, draws a parallel to Chapter 6’s discussion of how vomiting implied a sign of male weakness.
Gender hierarchies also leave studies on obstetrics almost nonexistent, leading Roach to wonder, “Is it institutional conservatism? Male squeamishness over obstetrical issues” (245). In her footnote about Dr. April Ronca’s research on rats, Roach pointedly notes that while NASA rejected a patch design for the study featuring a pregnant space shuttle with baby shuttles, the organization did permit another team’s design of sperm with Homer Simpson’s head. Roach contends, “There may be no sex in space, but there is sexism” (334). Space travel may breach the limits of an earthbound existence, but some gender inequalities remain intact.
9th-12th Grade Historical Fiction
View Collection
Books on U.S. History
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
New York Times Best Sellers
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
SuperSummary Staff Picks
View Collection
Teams & Gangs
View Collection
YA Nonfiction
View Collection