logo

44 pages 1 hour read

Robert D. Putnam

Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2015

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 1-3 Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 1 Summary: “The American Dream: Myths and Realities”

Putnam grew up in Port Clinton, Ohio, which was a “passable embodiment of the American Dream” in the 1950s—a place where everyone had decent opportunities (1). More recently, however, the same city is a “split-screen American nightmare, a community in which kids from the wrong side of the tracks that bisect the town can barely imagine the future that awaits the kids from the right side of the tracks” (1). This book explains how this transformation has happened all over America, why it is important, and what can be done to reverse course now.

Socioeconomic barriers were generally at their lowest in America in the 1950s. Discrimination and marginalization of women were still frequent, but social class did not constrain opportunities significantly. Today, however, class differences have a significant impact on opportunities. The author’s classmates (Port Clinton High School Class of 1959) experienced a high level of upward mobility, with nearly 75% obtaining more education than their parents and generally higher income. In contrast, their children experienced no upward mobility.

Kids in the Class of 1959 benefited from relatively low-cost education and widely available scholarships. Even kids who did not attend college right away often later went to community college. However, only 22% of the women in his class finished college, as compared with 88% of men. Women “were three times more likely to marry during college” (12), and most dropped out. In contrast, women are more likely to graduate from college today than men, but family background is more important. In addition, although race continues to be an issue, class origins are becoming more important.

Things began to change in Port Clinton when the manufacturing base began to crumble in the 1970s. Family and community ties softened the blow of these economic changes for a while, but eventually levels of juvenile delinquency rose along with unwed births, single-parent households, and child poverty. As the working class has collapsed, a new upper class has risen. The distribution of income is now larger at the top and bottom than the middle. Working class kids today are much worse off than in the 1950s.

Looking at inequality in America more broadly, it is important to distinguish between (1) inequality of income and wealth, and (2) inequality of opportunity and social mobility. The latter is the bigger concern to most people, but they are related, especially when inequality of wealth in one generation leads to inequality of opportunity in the next. This book focuses primarily on inequality of opportunity. Most people favor some redistribution of wealth, but an even greater number favor equal opportunity. Most also support increased spending on public education. America was founded with an egalitarian political structure in which upward mobility was seen as possible, and a booming economy reinforced that idea. That has changed in recent years.

Economic inequality was high in 1900, became more equal from 1910 to 1970, then began to reverse. These changes have also affected other measures of well-being, including life expectancy and happiness. There has also been a segregation along class lines. Kids today are less exposed to people outside of their economic niche. There are now more uniformly wealthy or poor neighborhoods, more wealthy and poor schools, and less marriages across class lines.

It is important to distinguish between absolute and relative upward mobility. In a growing economy, absolute upward mobility can increase, but relative upward mobility will not necessarily increase. Throughout history, absolute upward mobility accounts for most of the upward mobility: This is the idea that “a rising tide would lift all boats” (41). Today, however, we may be experiencing low absolute mobility and low relative mobility, “the worst of both worlds” (41). This book attempts to determine what is happening with today’s youth to predict whether that is the case. The book does not “distinguish among […] the indicators of social class, such as occupation, wealth, income, education, culture, social status, and self-identity” (44) because they are closely correlated. The book mainly uses education as the indicator of social class, not income, or it uses a composite measure when available.

In this chapter, Putnam includes the profiles of five classmates in the Port Clinton Class of 1959: Don, Frank, Libby, Jesse, and Cheryl. Don, a lower-class, first-generation college student, grew up on the poor side of town, but he went to college and enjoyed a successful career as a minister. Frank was part of one of the few wealthy families in town, but they did not flaunt their social status; Frank worked during the summer and attended a small college. Libby, a lower-class student, was one of 10 children; though her parents had high expectations for her education, she eventually dropped out of college to start a family. Libby’s gender held her back from upward mobility, but her social class did not. Jesse and Cheryl were the only two black students in Putnam’s class. Despite experiencing racism, both excelled in school and achieved successful careers in education.

To compare the Class of 1959 to life today in Port Clinton, Putnam also includes profiles for Chelsea and David. Chelsea, an upper-class student, comes from a wealthy family with an involved mother; if Chelsea “graduate[s] in the top 10 percent of [her] high school [class]” (26), her parents will pay for her entire college education. David, on the other hand, is a lower-class resident whose father was a high school dropout and is in prison for robbery. Though David wants to go to college, he is on probation and has a difficult time finding a job due to his own criminal record.

Chapter 2 Summary: “Families”

Bend, Oregon, like Port Clinton, has experienced great change over the years, transitioning from a small logging town to a vacation destination and a rapidly developing city. As a result, longtime residents in real estate and construction did well, but unskilled workers from the logging industry suffered: “The rising tide of prosperity in Bend definitely did not raise all boats” (46). The neighborhoods are segregated by income, and kids on each side of town have very different prospects.

Families have restructured along class lines over time. In the 1950s, most families had a working dad, a stay-at-home mom, and kids. This was possible because most families could survive on one income and out-of-wedlock births were rare. In the 1970s, however, this began to change. The divorce rate grew and so did single-parent households. This was initially viewed as a racial phenomenon, hitting the black community hardest, but it was and is more widespread than that.

Two new family structures emerged, along class divisions. First, the wealthiest third often had two working parents who had children later in life. Second, the poorer families often had unstable or nonexistent parental relationships. College-educated mothers tend to give birth 10 years later than high-school-educated mothers, who also have more unintended pregnancies and more nonmarital births. There is not as much of a racial gap as there is a class gap in this statistic. Less college-educated Americans get divorced, and more high-school-educated women cohabit (live as an unmarried couple), which rarely leads to marriage but often leads to children and eventually to “blended families” (68)—families in which there are step-parents and step-siblings without strong bonds. More high-school-educated men live apart from their children. College-educated mothers are much more likely to work outside of the home as part of a two-income family.

Recent immigrant families are more likely to have traditional marriages, but second-generation immigrants seem to fall into the two tiers identified above based on class. Less educated Americans are less likely to get married today, because less financial security leads to less stable relationships. It seems that “poverty produces family instability, and family instability in turn produces poverty” (74). Affluence and stability also reinforce each other. This pattern was seen in the Great Depression, during which marriage rates and birth rates dropped. Policy changes can affect family structure, such as the war on drugs, “three strikes” laws, and increased incarceration leading to several young fathers with less education going to jail, creating more single-parent families.

In this chapter, Putnam includes the profiles of two of Bend’s recent high school graduates, Andrew and Kayla. Andrew’s parents came from modest backgrounds but became wealthy before Andrew was born. Andrew put himself through college with part-time jobs and student loans. Kayla’s parents are an unstable, poor couple with a family history of alcoholism and abuse. Kayla attended a program for troubled adolescents at her high school and suffers from depression.

Chapter 3 Summary: “Parenting”

Atlanta, now the ninth-largest city in the United States, has grown faster than any other city since 1970. It has a diversified economy, and the affluent neighborhood of Buckhead is 95% white and has a median income of $150,000. Just 15 minutes south is a drug- and crime-ridden area that is 95% black and has a median income of $15,000 and a child-poverty rate of 75%. Even within the black community, disparities in income and class have grown: “Greater Atlanta also has the second-lowest rate of intergenerational social mobility of all major American cities, just behind Charlotte” (82).

Regardless of race or geographic location, the parenting styles of upper-middle-class families are similar in their “intensive investments of time, money, and thoughtful care in raising their kids” (91). They are more similar to each other than families in other classes living nearer to them or of the same race.

Children who experience severe, chronic stress early in life often have problems with executive functions and with controlling impulsive behavior, focusing, and following directions. Chronic stress impairs brain development and can lead to lifelong problems. The Adverse Childhood Experiences Scale measures events that can produce this type of toxic stress. The more of those that a child is exposed to, the worse the likely outcomes, although the effects can be minimized if a caring adult is in the picture. Focusing on early childhood development is key, because the class-based disparities emerge then and remain relatively stable over time without intervention.

There have been two major trends in parenting over the last 60 years. First, after World War II, Dr. Benjamin’s Spock’s idea that parents should relax and let their children develop at their own pace dominated. Second, beginning in the 1980s, the trend was from “permissive parenting” to “intensive parenting” (117). With intensive parenting, parents try to stimulate their children’s development early on, although less affluent parents do not typically have enough time for this type of parenting. Parenting styles are class-based and have a big impact. Even family dinners have a big impact, and wealthier families make family dinners a priority, whereas poorer families often do not or cannot do so.

In terms of money and time devoted to children, wealthier parents devote increasing amounts of time and money to child care and education and lower income families spent proportionately less even if income is held constant. These differences affect children’s cognitive development. Children in poorer families spend more time watching TV than children in wealthier families, who spend more time reading and studying.

In terms of nonparental child care, higher quality child care has better outcomes than relying on relatives. Parental stress levels are also lower in wealthier families. Grandparents in wealthier families often supplement parents’ financial resources, whereas grandparents in poorer families donate time to replace time the parents don’t have. The barriers that working-class families encounter are “more economic than racial” (100). In general, white families see the same disparities based on class as the black families profiled.

In terms of child development and what we know about brain development, early life experiences are very important to cognitive and social development. Executive functions develop rapidly between the ages of three and five, but not if the child is under chronic stress in that period. This means “early intervention is more powerful and cost-effective than intervention during adolescence” (110).

In this chapter, Putnam includes the profiles of three black families living in Atlanta whose “stories illustrate the interplay of economics, family structure, and parenting that affects the prospects of kids from different class backgrounds, whatever their racial background” (83). Desmond, a college graduate, has two siblings and is part of a religious, supportive, upper-middle-class family living in a racially diverse suburb. Michelle and Lauren have two brothers and were raised in a poor, black neighborhood by a single mother, Stephanie, with a family history of alcoholism and abuse. Lauren earned a degree at a local community college, but Michelle struggled in school and dropped out of college. Elijah grew up around murder and violence in the New Orleans projects and was raised by his paternal grandparents. Elijah graduated from high school but started using drugs and alcohol.

Chapters 1-3 Analysis

Through profiles of several of his classmates in Chapter 1, the author demonstrates that “[b]ecause the transmitters of socioeconomic status that are so potent today (economic insecurity, family instability, neighborhood distress, financial and organizational barriers) were unimportant in that period, the transmission process from generation to generation was weaker, and thus mobility was higher” (8). These chapters touch on gender differences in equality then and now but conclude that family background is now more important. Chapter 1 focuses on the author’s hometown, Port Clinton, Ohio, in 1959 and today, through several profiles of families in different classes. The focus then widens to discuss the broader picture of inequality in America today.

Chapter 2 looks at Bend, Oregon, and profiles kids from the wealthy and poor side of town, examining their family histories and how those affect their current prospects. These contrasting stories “epitomize the ways in which American family life has been restructured along class lines over the last half century” (61). There has been a transition, over time, beginning with traditional families, then to high divorce rates and single parents, and finally to a dichotomy between neo-traditional higher-income families and fragile lower-income families. This chapter debunks the idea that teen pregnancy is a major contributor to the problems of the poor. It also debunks the idea that the availability of welfare leads to more single mothers. In addition, ideology differences between liberals and conservatives appear to have very little to do with the changes in today’s family structure. However, other policy decisions do make a big difference, such as “three strikes” laws. No matter what the causes, these very different family structures affect the kids in these families significantly.

Chapter 3 shifts the focus to class differences in parenting practices, “with a special focus on the latest evidence about how early practices affect child development” (79). Using families in Atlanta as examples, this chapter illustrates the various types of parental involvement and support of children across classes. This also provides an opportunity to compare families in Atlanta to those in Bend (Chapter 2) and Port Clinton (Chapter 1). This comparison shows that all upper-middle-class families have parenting styles that are “strikingly alike” in terms of their “intensive investments of time, money, and thoughtful care in raising their kids” (91). 

This chapter also discusses the disruptive influence of maternal stress during a child’s first year of life. In contrast, “[p]arents who have a warm, nurturing relationship with their children can help them to build resilience and buffer stresses that would otherwise be damaging” (114). In other words, brain development is closely related to social class. Public resources are also mostly focused on K-12 today, when this research suggests that they probably should be focused earlier. Chapter 3 also discusses scientific research on brain development in young children and looks at class disparities that contribute to these differences in brain development.

These early chapters focus primarily on the family unit. The second half of the book has a more external focus.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Related Titles

By Robert D. Putnam