32 pages • 1 hour read
LonginusA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Longinus continues to describe literary techniques and how various writers use them. He discusses amplification, a type of literary elaboration in which the writer intensifies emotion or the presentation of facts in a step-by-step manner. Amplification must always go hand in hand with greatness or else it will be “slack and hollow” (19).
There is a lacuna in the text, after which Longinus compares two great orators, Demosthenes and Cicero. While Demosthenes’s oration has a sudden impact, like “lightning or the thunderbolt,” Cicero’s is like a “vast steady fire which flares up […] and is fed intermittently” (21).
Similar to Cicero’s, Plato’s prose flows “in a smooth and copious stream” (21). Plato’s writings, which drew inspiration from Homer’s, remind us that a writer may improve his own work by emulating great writers of the past. When we take a great model from the past, the model will “raise us to a higher level of imaginative power” (23), inspiring competition as well as admiration. Longinus argues that imitating great writers of the past is a valid “road to greatness” (22), and advises writers to imagine how Plato or Demosthenes would have written and judged their work. By the same token, writers should consider what posterity will think of their writing, to avoid producing texts that will quickly become time-bound and limited in their ability to reach readers.
Imagination is “the most effective way of attaining weight, dignity and realism” (23). The purpose of using imaginative language is to create vivid word-images that make readers see, in their mind’s eye, exactly what the writer is describing. Such writing goes “beyond persuasion” to “enthrall” and “excite” the audience on an emotional level, through the use of “fabulous” and “incredible” images. The dramatists Aeschylus and Euripides were masters of this technique. Longinus draws a contrast between poetry, which emphasizes the fantastic, and oratory, which relies on rational persuasion (“actuality and probability,” 26). Oratory can use vivid images, but they must not become too fantastic or far-fetched, overstepping into poetry.
These chapters are structurally fragmented, addressing a range of miscellaneous topics. Longinus’s discussion of amplification is also compromised by a lacuna that interrupts his argument.
Longinus’s opinions on good writing differ from modern aesthetic attitudes. Today, Western culture tends to value originality, personal authenticity, and the artist as a unique individual who is unconcerned with the standards of the past or with others’ opinions. Today’s aesthetic theories devalue the idea that artists exist in a long history of mutual influence. By contrast, ancient authors assumed that imitation was a valid way to create and that objective aesthetic standards dictated artistic production. Longinus’s praise for imitation, and his advice to consider how one’s writing will look to future generations, show a stark contrast between ancient and modern aesthetic thought.