19 pages • 38 minutes read
John KeatsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
During his lifetime, Keats’ poetry met with indifference or derision, with a selected group admiring his writing for its philosophical themes and sensual style. Critics from respected periodical like Blackwood’s, The Quarterly Review, and The Literary Chronicle and Weekly Review dismissed him as a lesser poet, with Blackwood’s being particularly harsh about Keats’s working-class roots. A year before his death, as Adam Kirsch notes, Keats wrote that he was reconciled to failure: “‘If I should die,’ said I to myself, ‘I have left no immortal work behind me—nothing to make my friends proud of my memory—but I have lov’d the principle of beauty in all things, and if I had had time I would have made myself remember’d’” (Kirsch, Adam. “Cloudy Trophies.” 2008. The New Yorker).
Keats’ tragic death, along with the fierceness of his friends and colleague’s admiration, spurred new interest and a reassessment of the negative criticism of his work. In 1822, renowned poet Percy Bysshe Shelley wrote his long poem, “Adonais” as a tribute to Keats, which solidified his mythos. Keats’s reputation only grew during the Victorian age when Lord Tennyson, in his capacity as Poet Laureate, declared Keats the greatest poet of the 19th century. In 1848, the first biography of Keats helped to solidify his place within the English canon. The Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, an aesthetic movement that prized classical and pre-Renaissance artistic modes, created significant popular paintings of figures from “Isabella,” “The Eve of St. Agnes” and “La Belle Dame sans Merci” which are still popular today. Keats’ poems, especially the odes, are now considered among the best in the English language; he is viewed as a member of the Romantic Movement, which focused on emotion, the individual, and the glorification of nature.
In a letter to his brothers in December of 1817, Keats laid out a new philosophy, coining a well-known phrase still used today: the concept of “negative capability.”
Keats defined “negative capability” as a state when “when a man is capable of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason”; Keats believed that for a great poet, such as Shakespeare, “the sense of Beauty overcomes every other consideration, or rather obliterates all consideration” (The Letters of John Keats, ed. by H E Rollins, Cambridge University Press, 1958, p. 193-94). In other words, it is more important for a writer to err on the side of awe or beauty than reason out everything, giving every detail or too much explanation. For example, in Shakespeare’s Macbeth, witches exist but we do not know, nor do we need to know, why they exist. This emphasis on the awe, and the valorization of being overwhelmed by a powerful external force such as “Beauty” forms one of the key philosophical tenets of Romanticism—the experience of the sublime.
The idea of negative capability has stood the test of time, with contemporary writers still referring to it, and psychologists using it in theory and practice. Negative capability embraces the paradoxical. For example, in “Ode on Melancholy,” seeing and appreciating beauty is juxtaposed with beauty’s ephemeral quality and the resultant human melancholy.
By John Keats