Nuclear War: A Scenario

Why might Jacobsen begin her timeline of the nuclear era with the 1960 meeting for the General Nuclear War rather than the bombing of Hiroshima or the development of the hydrogen bomb? Discuss the historical and thematic significance of this choice. What implications does this narrative decision have on the text?

The novel’s hypothetical scenario begins with the launch of a nuclear missile, with no mention of the preceding political context. How does this narrative choice impact the unfolding of events throughout the book? What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of starting the story at this critical moment rather than providing background information?

Analyze the influence of luck or chance versus systemic functions in the progression of the novel’s scenario. Provide concrete examples from the text where luck or systemic operations play a critical role in the events that transpire—whether in the hypothetical scenario or historical events.

Jacobsen presents a critical view of deterrence, yet many argue that it has prevented major conflicts, including nuclear war and a conventional war involving two or more major powers. Discuss the effectiveness of deterrence based on historical evidence and the narrative Jacobsen presents. What are the strengths and weaknesses of deterrence as a strategy for preventing nuclear war?

Evaluate the plausibility of a leader, like the “mad king” of North Korea, initiating a nuclear war due to personal motivations. How realistic is this portrayal, and what are the potential consequences of such actions? Discuss whether this scenario reflects a real threat or if it serves more as a dramatic device, using textual evidence to support your answer.

At what point does the scenario described in the book transition from a severe crisis to an apocalyptic outcome? Analyze the factors that contributed to this shift. What measures or decisions could have prevented or mitigated the escalation to global destruction?

Critically evaluate the Secretary of Defense’s appeal against launching retaliatory missiles back at Russia. What are the strategic, ethical, and practical considerations involved in his suggestion? Why is his proposal discussed, and what does this reveal about decision-making processes and rationality in critical situations such as a nuclear attack?

Examine how the “history lessons” Jacobsen provides contribute to the development of the fictional scenario the narrative presents. How do these lessons enhance the narrative’s depth? Use specific examples to discuss the value of these historical references and their impact on the narrative.