58 pages • 1 hour read
Anita LobelA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Anita and her brother face constant displacement. As the threatening Nazis are seemingly everywhere, Anita and her brother have to move around a lot. Displacement defines their lives, and the theme emerges within the first two pages of the Poland section when their dad suddenly leaves. His departure foreshadows the various departures of Anita, her brother, and Niania. They go from Krakow to Lapanow, where Anita says, “We began to hear rumors of roundups in nearby villages. It was just as it had been in Krakow” (19). Anita feels safe with Niania in her village, but her mom arrives and incidentally forces them back to Krakow, where events uproot them multiple times. They sneak into the ghetto, have to hide in crowded spaces once there, and then sneak out. When Niania gets them into a convent run by nuns, Anita says, “Until the war came to an end, I wanted everything to stay as it was right now” (63). Stability eludes Anita, and she and her brother move from a prison to a series of concentration camps.
In Sweden, too, Anita faces routine displacement: She goes from the hospital to the shelter and then to a couple of residences with her parents. The instability in Sweden doesn’t feel like “deportation or a flight” but it’s “unwanted exile” (142). This constant displacement prevents Anita from constructing a solid identity. Uprooted from her childhood home and culture, she associates instability with Judaism. Since she is a child, Anita understands the materiality of her experiences but not the reasoning behind them. She doesn’t understand that she is targeted as a Jew because of antisemitism, but she knows that because she is Jewish, she must constantly flee to avoid death. As such, she doesn’t want to be Jewish. The fleeting periods of stability connect to Christianity; when she’s with Niania in her village or the convent, she feels safe and like she doesn’t want to leave. When Anita finally settles down in Sweden, stability remains associated with Christianity, and she crafts her new identity around it. Unlike her brother, who is studying for his bar mitzvah, she practices Protestantism and builds an identity separate from the one forced on her in Poland. In high school, Anita becomes an artist with a friend group. Now, she’s not a Jewish girl on the run.
The theme of displacement and instability is reflected in the text’s structure. Anita has an impressionistic, stream-of-consciousness style. Lobel jumps into Anita’s childlike mindset and documents her thoughts and impressions as they occur. She skips from past to present; for example, she sees Cousin Raisa in the present, pivots to a memory of Raisa in a transparent coat, and then returns to the present to state that Raisa isn’t as pretty as she once was. The jumpy structure recreates a sense of displacement and instability for the reader, paralleling Anita’s physical displacement.
In Homo Sacer, the Italian theorist Giorgio Agamben discusses the link between the “modern State” and “the secret tie uniting power and bare life” (Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen, Stanford University, 1998, p. 6). Anita’s account also unveils this allegedly covert bond. When she says, “Every time I looked in the mirror all I could think of was: Jew, Jew. Ugly, obvious Jew girl” (55), she’s connecting the body she was born with the identity that the “modern State”—the Nazis—attaches to it. All types of people can have Anita’s features, but Nazis assign her features to Jewish identity and use that to dehumanize and brutalize them. Anita struggles with her body and its imposed associations with her identity. Her story also reveals the brittleness of identity, as she and her family had “comfortable lives” (xii) until the Nazis came along and ejected them from society.
Stigmatized and isolated, the Jews seem to lose everything but their bodies, so the body becomes a central focus for Anita. At the Ravensbrück concentration camp, she says, “[O]ur bodies were nothing more than two hungry, itching lumps” (111). As their society equates Jews with death, Anita and her brother must keep their bodies alive and functioning. In the camps, they have to kill the lice on their bodies and find food, eating “a raw potato in the mud” as a last resort. To use the bathroom in the boxcar, Anita climbs to the top and risks her life. She survives and feels “triumph, almost joy” (106). With the theme of bodies and societal identities, No Pretty Pictures exhibits the brutality of the Nazis. They created a savage environment in which figuring out how to use the bathroom qualifies as an accomplishment. As Anita survives, the theme also showcases her resourcefulness and willpower.
Separate from the Nazis’ lethal antisemitic construct, the body and social identity influence Anita’s perception of life. She is regularly fascinated by how people’s bodies deviate from their supposed identities. Anita remembers how her grandmother once tried to tell her something, admitting, “I didn’t pay any attention to what she was saying. I was busy looking at the cold sore, right in the center of her upper lip” (10). It’s as if the cold sore becomes the grandma’s identity; she’s not a grandma, but a blister—a product of the body. After seeing Sister Ignacja washing, Anita says, “Now, all I could think of was their naked bodies under their brown habits” (58). Again, the sight of the body collapses the societal construct of the pure, bodiless nun.
The unstable relationship between bodies and social identities contributes to Anita’s use of imagery and not names or terms. A term or name can deceive and change, as illustrated by the Nazis’ use of coded language to discuss mass murder. Likewise, Anita privileges physicality in her relationships. After she is rescued, her parents don’t feel real to her in their letters, but she is overwhelmed when they show up in person. The most accurate way to assess someone or something is through nuanced observation, and Anita privileges looking over categorization.
The title of the book, No Pretty Pictures, suggests the theme of suffering and serves as a warning to readers: Lobel’s book won’t contain many beautiful moments. The first sentence reinforces the theme of suffering and functions as a second warning to the reader: Lobel declares, “I was born in Krakow, Poland. In a wrong place at a wrong time” (xi). The wrong place is Eastern Europe, and the wrong time is 1939. The Nazis invaded Poland in September 1939, and their presence exposed Anita and her family to life-or-death suffering. Throughout the book, Anita and her family must manage, evade, and face terrible hardship.
Lobel complicates the theme of suffering when she says it’s “wearisome as well as dangerous to cloak and sanctify oneself with the pride of victimhood.” She adds, “I have spent many, many more years living well” (xiii). Although the book centers on her suffering, Lobel doesn’t want suffering to define her life. She states, “Childhoods are difficult even in the best of times” (xii). In other words, all children suffer to a degree, and Lobel asks the reader to treat Anita as if she was another child. With this, Lobel does not sugarcoat Anita’s complicated feelings about Judaism and her occasional mistreatment of others. Suffering doesn’t excuse Anita’s behavior, and Anita’s suffering doesn’t make her special or different from other children.
Every child confronts suffering, and Lobel goes back in time and enters Anita’s mentality to relay her experiences. Lobel says, “Mine is only another story” (190). She doesn’t attach an explicit lesson or meaning to Anita’s survival. Her reluctance to stamp a message on her experiences underlines the idea that the Holocaust’s victims did not suffer for some higher purpose. The scale of this violence is baffling, and many struggled to find meaning in its wake. Ultimately, there is no greater meaning behind Anita’s suffering or her survival; she survived to survive and become a person who could craft her own identity. In concluding, “My life has been good. I want more” (190), Lobel argues that suffering doesn’t have to be life-defining, and it doesn’t have to take on a greater meaning.
Childhood & Youth
View Collection
European History
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
International Holocaust Remembrance Day
View Collection
Jewish American Literature
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
World War II
View Collection