logo

42 pages 1 hour read

Ian Buruma

Murder in Amsterdam: Liberal Europe, Islam, and the Limits of Tolerance

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2006

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Essay Topics

1.

During Murder in Amsterdam, Buruma returns many times to the principles of the European Enlightenment, namely discourse, tolerance, and freedom of speech and debate to be handled in a non-violent, non-confrontational matter. However, as war is widely considered what Carl von Clausewitz calls “diplomacy by other means,” at what point might violence be justified in the handling of political disagreement?

2.

Throughout Murder in Amsterdam, Buruma alludes directly to the German Occupation of the Netherlands during World War II and the treatment of Dutch Jews. How does this historical guilt hang over and influence modern-day Dutch politics and society?

3.

Freedom of speech is considered to be a basic right for those living in modern Western liberal democracies. However, in recent years, the rise of politically correct culture has often served to demonize those who speak out too harshly against perceived minority groups. In what ways, if at all, is it possible to balance one’s right to free speech with the need to not offend minority groups whose beliefs and culture might be different from that of the majority?

4.

One of the main European liberal tenets to emerge from the radical political shake-ups of the 1960s was the idea of multi-culturalism, the belief that multiple cultures can exist independently yet side-by-side within the same nation without conflict occurring. Opponents of multi-culturalism argue that this prevents immigrants from fully assimilating into society and allows for the creation of parallel societies that have their own codes of conduct and social norms, which many times run counter to the foundational constitution of their adopted countries. Is multi-culturalism possible, or should it be required for immigrants to assimilate into the culture of their adopted homelands?

5.

In the welfare state it is presumed that the government is responsible for the well-being of its citizens. However, in regard to immigrants, many feel that the welfare state, through assistance and subsidies, de-incentivizes many immigrants to take on personal responsibility. Is there such a thing as too much assistance, or are the abundance of government social programs a necessary evil required to make sure that people can survive in a society that is not their own?

6.

One major social philosophy present in today’s academic discourse is the ideal of Cultural Relativism, the notion that is impossible to compare cultures with one another because they are all unique and intrinsically different. This eschews the idea that one culture can be “better” than another. Do you believe this to be the case, or do you believe that cultures can and should be ranked according to the practices and norms found within them?

7.

Theo van Gogh was primarily an artist who used his art to make political statements, and it cost him his life. What is the role of art in politics and politics in art? Are they both forever intertwined, or should they remain separate entities that never overlap with each other?

8.

In his discussion with the Moroccan psychiatrist Bellari Said, Buruma relates how Said has noted a high rate of schizophrenia in second-generation immigrants born in the Netherlands. They often feel a sense of displacement and exist in a limbo in which they are neither Dutch nor citizens of their ancestral countries. How is identity constructed? What are some foundational elements that lead to one’s identity and what one identifies as?

9.

The Netherlands, and Amsterdam in particular, has long been thought of as the great success story of Western European liberalization. Legalized drugs, prostitution, and a general atmosphere of tolerance are three things that come to mind when one thinks of the Netherlands; however, it is exactly this level of tolerance and freedom that seem to have such adverse effects on the immigrant community. Do you feel it is possible to have too much freedom, and that in its way, excessive freedom can be detrimental? If so, why?

10.

Often Islam is discussed as though it is an all-encompassing entity; this fails to take into consideration that Islam “like all major faiths comes in many forms and degrees of orthodoxy” (146). In Murder in Amsterdam, some have argued that the retention of faith for Muslim immigrants is essential because it grounds them in a place where they are otherwise unmoored. Others have argued that it is precisely the religion, not the cultural differences, that hold them back in their attempts to assimilate and move forward in Dutch culture. How are culture and religion intertwined, and how might immigrants be imposing their culture into their interpretations of religion? Is Islam compatible with Western Culture?

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text