68 pages • 2 hours read
Dava SobelA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
In 1714 The English Parliament commissioned a committee to create an appropriate prize for a solution to the longitude problem. They sought the advice of the great physicist Sir Isaac Newton as well as astronomer Edmund Halley, who had mapped the major stars of the Southern Hemisphere and magnetic variations that affect compass readings. Newton summarized the options currently in use but believed better methods were possible.
In July, Parliament passed the Longitude Act, which offered a prize of £20,000 (millions of US dollars today) for “‘Practicable and Useful’ methods” that could compute longitude to within half a degree (54), or 34 miles at the Equator. Prizes of £15,000 and £10,000 would go to methods that reduced the error to two-thirds of a degree and one degree, respectively.
The Act established a Board of Longitude made up of prominent politicians, naval officials, and scientists (including Newton) that could award small grants to help promising inventions move forward. (The Board would serve for more than 100 years and disburse £100,000 in incentives.) The prize attracted a crowd of eager contestants, many of them quacks or overeager inventors with plans for improving all sorts of naval technology, creating perpetual motion machines, or solving pi.
One witty inventor, Jeremy Thacker, joked that all the other inventors, with their various forms of meters—“Selenometers” and “Heliometers,” for example—were “crack’d,” and that he had invented instead the perfect “Chronometer.” It was indeed an improvement, but not enough to win the prize. Meanwhile, what he had intended as a joke became the standard name for a clock of high accuracy.
The problem with all timepieces (including Thacker’s, which was off by six seconds a day) was that temperature changes caused clock pendulums and springs to expand or contract, altering their ability to keep to within three seconds a day, or two minutes over a six-week voyage—the minimum accuracy required to win the £20,000 prize.
By 1712 Newton and astronomer Edmund Halley, proponents of ephemerides, grew impatient for the Royal Observatory’s data, which was still being edited after 40 years of observations. They pirated the data and published it. The Observatory’s director, John Flamsteed, recovered most of the copies and burned them.
Clockmaker John Harrison was born in 1693, learned woodworking from his father, taught himself science by studying the works of Newton and other natural philosophers, and learned about clocks by building three of them. The works of these clocks were made entirely of wood, and their cogs were nearly unbreakable. Harrison also played musical instruments, rang the local church’s steeple bells, and directed the choir. Despite his mechanical brilliance, he had trouble expressing himself: His longest sentence, written late in life in a book that explains his dealings with the Board of Longitude, goes on for 25 pages.
Harrison married twice. His first wife, Elizabeth, died when their son, John, was only six. His second marriage lasted 50 years and produced William, who was later his father’s “champion” during the decades of struggle to win the prize, and Elizabeth, about whom little is known.
Harrison built his first clock tower in 1722; it still works today. To deter rust, Harrison avoided metal, instead using self-greasing tropical hardwoods or specially selected oak. Elsewhere, to solve the problem of pendulum-clock accuracy, Harrison and his brother James combined alternating strips of brass and steel, which “counteracted each other’s changes in length as temperatures varied” (71). John also invented a friction-free mechanism. The Harrisons’ clocks were accurate to within one second a month, 60 times better than any competing timepiece.
Pendulums, though, wouldn’t work properly at sea, so John Harrison set out to solve the longitude problem with a new type of clock.
In 1730 Harrison visited Edmund Halley, director of the Royal Observatory, with plans for a sea clock. Though skeptical of mechanical solutions to the longitude problem, Halley was impressed, and he introduced Harrison to watchmaker George Graham, who became Harrison’s patron.
The Harrison brothers developed their first sea clock, the all-brass “Harrison’s No. 1” (77), and presented it to Graham in 1735. He forwarded the invention not to the Board of Longitude, but to the Royal Society, which recommended a trial run. In 1736, the clock got its test aboard the naval vessel HMS Centurion on a week-long run from London to Lisbon. Unfortunately, the ship’s captain died suddenly at Lisbon before writing up his impressions. On the return trip aboard the HMS Orford, the clock predicted the ship’s location accurately, whereas the commander’s reckoning was 60 miles off. Impressed, the commander wrote up a positive affidavit.
The following week, the Board of Longitude met to consider Harrison’s new clock. Harrison, however, argued for time and money to make the clock even better. The Board agreed. Five years later, Harrison returned with a greatly improved clock, H-2, which withstood elaborate tests and warranted a sea trial. Harrison, however, argued that this second clock still wasn’t up to his own standards. The Board relented, and Harrison went back to his studio, now in London, and toiled for 20 years on the third sea clock.
Graham, meanwhile, borrowed H-1 and exhibited it at his own shop, where dignitaries came to ogle at its precise timekeeping.
While John Harrison perfected his sea clock, others were improving the system of gauging longitude by the stars. Using a new instrument called a reflecting quadrant and a later improvement called a sextant, sailors would make extensive observations of celestial objects. They then would consult ephemerides—their tables filled with data gleaned over 60 years by astronomers John Flamsteed and Edmund Halley—of the position of the moon against the background of stars, or of its position relative to the sun, at any given moment throughout the year. This process could take hours even on a clear night, but by comparing the difference between the recorded time of the celestial event in the skies above Paris or London and the local time of the ship at sea, sailors could compute their longitude.
When Halley died in 1742, James Bradley became Astronomer Royal at Greenwich, where he improved the star catalog, discovered the diameter of Jupiter, and perfected the calculation of the speed of light. However, he ignored Harrison’s invention despite having been an early supporter of it.
Bradley discovered a new, improved method of predicting the moon’s position. This method came from German mapmaker Tobias Mayer and mathematician Leonhard Euler, who worked out an elegant equation for the relationships between the Earth, moon, and sun. Lunar tables became so accurate that, beginning in 1757, seagoing tests were held to determine whether the ephemerides rated the longitude prize. The Board gave out grants and small awards, but the big bounty remained out of reach.
With his son William, Harrison spent nearly two decades perfecting the 753 parts that made up his latest sea clock, H-3. The new clock contained improvements in bi-metal temperature control and ball bearings that reduced friction. The device also was much smaller and lighter than its two forebears. The Board of Longitude waited patiently, extending Harrison’s grants while he and his son toiled on the project. The Royal Society awarded John the Copley Gold Medal and invited him to join their group; he campaigned instead for William to become a member, and the Society admitted him.
John commissioned a watchmaker, John Jeffreys, to construct a pocket watch to strict specifications. This timepiece, which still exists today, was vastly more accurate than other pocket watches of the era: “Some horologists consider the Jeffreys timepiece the first true precision watch” (105). The smallness and portability influenced the design of H-4, which came in at a mere three pounds and five inches in width. Harrison perfected H-4’s movement with diamonds.
Ornately crafted, “the Watch” remains a masterpiece. Its innards, carefully miniaturized, had to be cleaned and oiled every three years. Today it’s displayed alongside its frictionless siblings H-1, H-2, and H-3 at the National Maritime Museum in London, but H-4 is no longer permitted to run, lest its mechanism wear out.
Chapters 6 through 10 detail John Harrison’s attempts to perfect a clock that could help determine longitude at sea.
The science and engineering of Harrison’s time benefited from knowledge rediscovered during the Renaissance and augmented over the ensuing two centuries. The researchers of the day were called “natural philosophers”; the term “scientist” wouldn’t be applied to their profession until the 1830s. Science was largely the domain of wealthy and educated men who often worked alone to develop new and better techniques and gather increasingly precise data about the natural world. Unlike today, when large teams of women and men build the gadgets and discover the arcane scientific principles that improve the modern world, in 1700s Europe science advanced mainly through the efforts of lone geniuses, sometimes assisted by one or two colleagues.
Though John Harrison fits this description in some ways, he wasn’t born into wealth but earned it through self-education and diligent effort, rising from the ranks of tradesman to become one of the world’s most famous inventors. Harrison was a young adult when the Longitude Prize was announced, but he did nothing about it until 12 years later. It’s likely that he knew about the prize early on, but that his perfectionism, basic honesty, and lack of concern for the opinions of others led him (as they certainly did later) to take his time with his inventions.
Harrison’s slow approach gave time for a competing process, the lunar method, to improve itself. One of the most important developments was the use of equations that could better predict the moon’s position. It turns out that the moon and sun undergo a series of eclipses, called a Saros, of 18 years, 11 days (give or take a leap year or two), and 8 hours. Because of the extra eight hours, each such cycle begins above a different set of latitudes and longitudes on the Earth. Each Saros is also part of a series of varying sighting locations that can last more than 1,200 years. All this complexity needed straightening out; Euler’s equations were the solution, and the lunar method’s timetables for future lunar events got much more accurate as a result.
The author notes that the Board of Longitude amounted to “the world’s first official research-and-development agency” (54). Many such organizations now exist, including US high-tech institutes like the RAND Corporation and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Large companies often maintain research arms, including AT&T’s famous Bell Telephone Laboratories (now Nokia Bell Labs), Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works, and, more recently, Alphabet-Google’s X Development facility.
In the centuries since the Longitude Act, many prizes have been offered for inventions that greatly improve human life. Charles Lindbergh, for example, won the Orteig Prize in 1927 for making the first transatlantic flight. More recent prizes in the US include the DARPA 2005 Grand Challenge award of $2 million for a successful robotic car, and the 2004 Ansari XPrize $10 million award for the first reusable spacecraft able to reach space twice in two weeks (Burt Rutan and Paul Allen’s SpaceShipOne).
One would expect most applicants for the Longitude Act prize to leap at the chance to receive the bounty as soon as the Board of Longitude was ready to grant it, but Harrison was a perfectionist who refused to accept accolades before he felt he deserved them. In a way, his attitude was arrogant, since it reversed the social order by making him, instead of the Board, the arbiter of when his device deserved recognition. However, this strict way of thinking put accuracy before glory, and it may have been the precise state of mind needed to invent a clock that kept time nearly to perfection.
By Dava Sobel