logo

52 pages 1 hour read

Philip Paul Hallie

Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1994

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 4: “Consequences—1943-1944”

Part 4, Chapter 8 Summary: “Daniel Trocmé, a Conscience Without Gaps”

In war, soldiers use their experience to become battle hardened and learn to preserve their lives in the most dangerous situations. The Chambonnais, in contrast, learned the desperate need of the refugees and felt a moral imperative to help them. As a result, some of the Chambonnais died, notably Daniel, Trocmé’s cousin, who was the monitor of The Crickets, the first funded house established after Trocmé met with Chalmers. Daniel later was also responsible for the funded House of the Rocks, and it was there that he was arrested in 1943 after the arrival of the Gestapo in southern France.

While the Gestapo detained Daniel and his charges at the House of the Rocks, Magda heard of the raid and bicycled to the house. She was allowed in because the soldiers thought she was a maid, and she went to the kitchen after nearly exposing Daniel as the leader of the house. The Gestapo demanded that Magda and the school’s cook make them food. After eating, they interrogated all the children and Daniel. The children ranged in age from eight years old to teenagers. Many of them came out of the interrogation with bruises and injuries. During this time, Magda learned from Daniel that a Spanish boy at the House of the Rocks saved a German soldier recently. She rushed to the local hotel to ask the German soldiers there to intervene to protect the boy and the others at the house. She convinced two soldiers to come with her, and they successfully advocated for the boy’s release. She went home, but her son Jean-Pierre insisted on going back with her to see if Daniel and the others were also released.

On their way to the House of the Rocks, Magda and Jean-Pierre saw a Nazi soldier beating a young Jewish boy with a set of phylacteries—a prayer aid given to Jewish boys at their Bar Mitzvah. It was brutal and shocking, horrifying both mother and son. Magda restrained Jean-Pierre from intervening. When they arrived at the House of the Rocks, Daniel and the children were lined up to board buses for deportation.

Daniel, during his interrogation, felt compelled to intensely defend his Jewish charges and all Jewish people. This defense led the Gestapo to believe that Daniel was a Jew masquerading as a member of the Trocmé family. Daniel and the children were taken to the death camp at Maidanek in Poland, and he was killed in 1944 in the gas chamber there. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Righteousness in Israel in 1976, along with Trocmé, and trees were planted in their honor.

Part 4, Chapter 9 Summary: “Flight From the Gestapo”

Shortly before the House of the Rocks raid, the Maquis killed Commissioner Praly, a vibrant young Protestant gathering intelligence for the Vichy government in Le Chambon. This was likely part of the reason for the House of the Rocks raid and was certainly part of the reason that Trocmé’s and Theis’s names were placed on the Gestapo death list. Trocmé learned this information from a man who said that he was a double agent for the Maquis and the Gestapo. Though encouraged by the man and later by church leadership to flee, Trocmé was deeply conflicted about leaving his village without a leader. However, he was finally convinced by the thought of his family and the refugees being in greater danger because he stayed.

Trocmé first stayed at a presbytery in Lamastre but was evicted by the pastor. That eviction likely saved Trocmé’s life because the Gestapo came to Lamastre looking for him and seemed to have lost him at that point. He then stayed for some time at a house on a hill in the department of Ardèche, next moving to a country house where he became the object of a woman’s affections and contacted Magda to help him out of the uncomfortable situation. He then stayed at a boardinghouse in the Drôme, where he learned that Jacques was beside himself, missing his father. Trocmé sent for Jacques, and they spent blissful time together playing, learning, and bonding. They were almost discovered when they traveled to Valence for an important meeting and Trocmé ran to catch the train, attracting the attention of German officers performing a checkpoint and roundup.

As he sat in the prison van, Trocmé realized that he would be asked his identity and would either have to lie and betray his conscience or tell the truth and likely be sent to a death camp. In concern for Jacques, he asked the officers to bring his son to him so that he could tell him what to do. The officers realized that Trocmé was not trying to avoid the roundup and took him to the control line after getting Jacques. Trocmé narrowly escaped having his papers examined, and the next day, he and Jacques safely returned to hiding. When the Americans stormed the beach at Normandy, Trocmé returned home to his family.

Theis’s name was also on the death list. He hid by working with the Cimade to relocate Jews from France to safety in Switzerland. He took massive risks and was even arrested, but it was in Switzerland, so the Cimade helped free him. He kept working with the Cimade even beyond the Normandy invasion.

Part 4, Chapter 10 Summary: “The Death of an Eccentric”

One reason that Le Chambon, unlike many villages near the end of the war, never experienced a major massacre by the Gestapo was the idealism of Roger Le Forestier. A young doctor who studied with Albert Schweitzer, he came to Le Chambon in 1939 and appealed to Trocmé to let him live at the presbytery and be a second village doctor. He was a brilliant doctor and saved multiple lives in Le Chambon. He met and married the love of his life, Danielle, during the occupation, and Magda accompanied them to their wedding in Monte Carlo. Le Forestier was deeply committed to nonviolence but served as a doctor for the Maquis. Near the end of the war, after Normandy, the Maquis demanded that he let them use his ambulance to transport armed troops. He refused, even under threat of death: An ambulance with a red cross was to be left alone by combatants because it couldn’t carry armed soldiers. He was accused of cowardice when he wouldn’t take the ambulance to the site of a supposed battle (which didn’t happen) and thus went to Le Puy to plead for the release of some Maquis prisoners, in part to prove his courage.

On the way, he gave two Maquis soldiers a ride after they told him that they were unarmed. A bank robbery had occurred earlier in Le Puy, and the German police searched Le Forestier’s car. He was arrested and beaten when they found a loaded revolver hidden in the backseat, left there by the Maquis. He was nearly sentenced to death when prosecuted by Colonel Metzger, but Catholic Major Schmehling was moved by Le Forestier’s insistence on his nonviolent beliefs. He refused to convict Le Forestier of a capital crime, instead asking Le Forestier to volunteer to treat the wounded in Germany.

The Gestapo arranged to have Le Forestier taken from the work group and imprisoned in Lyons. Le Forestier, along with many other prisoners including women and children, were taken into the woods surrounding Lyons and shot, and their bodies were then burned. When Trocmé and Magda saw Schmehling years after the war, he explained that his guilt over Le Forestier and his sympathy for the man moved him to use all his influence to prevent a mass raid or massacre by the Secret Service on Le Chambon.

Part 4, Chapter 11 Summary: “The Astonishing Weeks”

The text compares the time in Le Chambon near the end of the war to author Albert Camus’s The Plague in that although one is history and one is fiction, both narratives concern the pointlessness of death and the goodness of individual men. After the invasion of Normandy, the Germans became desperate, and the fighting and violence in France intensified before dissipating. When Trocmé returned to Le Chambon, he initially thought that his worst fear, that Le Chambon would lose its commitment to nonviolence in his absence, had come true. However, he found that Magda and other women in the village worked together to create a hub for the Cimade teams to evacuate refugees to safety in Switzerland.

In early July 1944, Manou Barraud, a good friend of 14-year-old Jean-Pierre, was accidentally shot and killed by a boy staying at Madame Barraud’s pension. When Manou came home from helping with the Cub Scouts in town, she and the boy went investigating in the temporarily empty rooms of the Maquissards staying at the boardinghouse. The boy, Jean, found a revolver and pointed it in jest at Manou, but a bullet was in the chamber, and he shot and killed her. When Madame Barraud discovered her daughter dead, her first thought was of Jean, whom she repeatedly comforted, telling him that it was not his fault.

A month later, after counseling friends in town, Trocmé and Magda returned home to the presbytery to discover Jean-Pierre hanged in the bathroom. Whether he intentionally killed himself (as the doctor believed) or it was an accident born from an imaginative attempt to emulate a poem he had heard the night before was unclear. His death devastated both parents, seriously challenging Trocmé’s faith in God and ending Magda’s entirely. She never engaged in religious practices again.

At the end of the war in France, cruelty characterized both sides of the fight. German prisoners-of-war in France were often treated terribly in revenge for Germany’s cruelty. Trocmé, holding fast to his belief in the potential of human redemption, prevented much of that cruelty in Le Chambon. As the refugees found family and safety elsewhere, the village began to return to its sleepy beginnings. Trocmé worked hard to reinvest and revitalize the Cévenol school and was successful. The war and his son’s death had changed him, however, and those who returned to Le Chambon after long absences noted that Trocmé had become harder and more authoritarian, more intellectual, and less invested in the individual people in Le Chambon. He left the parish and pursued international work toward nonviolence for the rest of his life.

Part 4 Analysis

The connection between Daniel and Le Forestier demonstrates their importance in the events in Le Chambon and underscores an element of innocence and dedication that is at once dangerous and laudable. Although each story has a dedicated chapter and they were arrested and killed for different reasons, their descriptions are similar, especially in consideration of their youth. Both thematically represent The Morality of Nonviolence. Daniel would likely have been released rather than executed except that every time he was questioned, he insisted on defending the Jewish people. The contrast between Daniel and a seasoned soldier who would have known to give only short answers rather than engage in debate underscores the larger point in that chapter: that those engaged in nonviolent resistance did so because it was right rather than from self-preservation. Le Forestier’s impassioned defense nearly saved his life because it convinced Schmehling of the value of nonviolence. However, that exact dedication (both his refusal to help the Maquis commit violence and him condemning the violence of the Nazis) laid the groundwork that led to Le Forestier’s death. In presenting their stories in the same section, the book demonstrates their connection through their commitment to nonviolence.

The reference to Camus’s The Plague in Chapter 11 presents a metaphor of sickness and disease relating to the actions of people during war and in violent action. The stories of Manou’s and Jean-Pierre’s deaths are told in tandem and in the context of this metaphor, helping intensify readers’ emotional investment. The idea that war, hatred, and violence are in themselves an illness in the moral fiber of humanity is a subtle argument throughout the book. The deaths of Manou and Jean-Pierre relate only tangentially to the war: “But death, like the biological microbe of inguinal fever in Camus’s Oran, was in the air of Le Chambon” (251). Manou would likely never have had a gun pointed at her in jest or otherwise were it not for the war and the violence surrounding it. Magda and Trocmé might have been at home, paying closer attention to Jean-Pierre’s imaginative musings or seeing some other warning signs, were it not for the war. The underlying argument in the book’s incorporation of the metaphor of disease and contagion into this chapter is that violence begets violence, even if the connections are vague and undefined.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text