54 pages • 1 hour read
Paul E. Johnson, Sean WilentzA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
A freed slave named Isabella Van Wagenen introduced Matthews to Pierson in 1832. The authors present Pierson as weak-willed and gullible, while Matthews is portrayed as domineering and opportunistic. When Matthews realized that Pierson was wealthy and easily influenced, Matthews convinced Pierson of Matthews’s ability to inspire Pierson. He claimed that Pierson’s “prophethood” depended on Matthews’s decision to commission Pierson to the role of prophet; consequently, Matthews was Pierson’s guide to God's truth. Pierson believed Matthews and, convinced that Matthews was God’s prophet, turned his pulpit over to him and never preached again. Matthews moved in with Sylvester Mills, an associate of Pierson's, and conducted fire-and-brimstone sermons from that point on.
At peak membership, the Kingdom’s congregation had about fifty followers. Matthews’s evangelical sermons were misogynist in both tone and content. He also damned the enemies of the Jews, including "Christian devils" like the Finneyites. He claimed to exist in the Spirit of Truth and that he had lived for thousands of years in various incarnations, including Adam, Abraham, and Jesus Christ. As the prophet Matthias, Matthews sought to “establish that Reign of Truth and redeem the world from devils, prophesying women and beaten men” (92).
Matthews predicted that the world would end in 1851, when God's new kingdom would be established. Money and property would cease to exist, and Matthews would rule the entire world from a great golden temple. He insisted that his congregation prepare for the life of luxury to come and ordered custom silverware to replace the congregation’s plain plates and bowls. He became well-known in the city for his ostentatious clothing.
Pierson was convinced that Matthews is a prophet, and in his devotion, he continued to do everything Matthews asked of him. He believed that he was receiving messages from both God and his dead wife Sarah, and that in serving Matthews, he was obeying God’s will. Matthews condemned merchants, professionals in law, medicine and religion, and anyone who educated and supported women. He also stated that the demise of traditional religion was due to “female spirits…[who] participate in Christian chaos and disobedience” (95).
Matthews’s misogyny and bizarre religious rhetoric caused concern in the community outside the Kingdom. The worried brother of Sylvester Mills, a follower, reported the Kingdom to local authorities, and a warrant was issued for Matthews’s arrest. Matthews’s beard was forcibly shaved and both he and Sylvester Mills were committed to Bellevue Mental Hospital. Matthews was released but Mills was not released, and the congregation began to collapse. Pierson remained loyal, and he rented Matthews a house, where Matthews continued to preach. Here, Isabella, the woman who introduced Pierson and Matthews, worked as Matthews’s housekeeper. By April 1833, even Pierson became disenchanted and fed up with Matthews’s increasingly irrational behavior; he finally cut off his financial support of Matthews, leaving Matthews homeless.
After Pierson stopped funding Matthews, another follower named Benjamin Folger stepped in to provide financial support to Matthews. Folger and his wife continued to believe Matthews and his claim that he was God’s prophet. Aware that Benjamin Folger and his wife Ann were both under his spell, Matthews agreed to move to their estate at Heartt Place, near Sing Sing, in upstate New York. Matthews renamed the residence Mount Zion and established a small community of devoted followers. Matthias preached that his business failures were the fault of other revival movements and their effects on the development of capitalism and social mores. He promised his followers that “[in] the Kingdom of Matthias there would be no market, no money, no buying or selling, no wage system with its insidious domination of one father over another, no economic oppression of any kind” (96). By moving the Kingdom out of the city, he sought to “revive the rural ways he had known in his youth” (106). He changed the ritual suppers to better suit his anti-market sentiments:
Parts of the Prophet’s food code, however, had nothing to do with even the most wildly imagined Judaism…[and] stemmed not from Matthias’ kinship with the ancient Hebrews but from his hatred of new-fangled, middle-class ways introduced by the market revolution (109).
Everyone at Mount Zion had a job assigned by Matthews, who continued the ostentatious and luxurious lifestyle he had taken up in Manhattan and encouraged acts of wife-swapping. Supper was always a feast, but Matthews imposed his own dietary rules on the congregation. No fowl or pork was allowed, and meat was always boiled, never roasted. During supper rituals, Matthews sat at the head of the table, and the women served him separately. He drank from a silver chalice, while everyone else drank from plain tumblers. Eventually, Matthews’s hatred of traditional Christianity caused him to ban prayer altogether. Suppers were dominated by his long, angry sermons on a range of subjects.
Matthews’s influence was so strong that no one dared to challenge him. His Kingdom “echoed the rustic abundance of [his] half-remembered, half-idealized [memories] of Coila” (110). Matthias opposed gender equality, espousing the Calvinist belief that women were inferior beings. His fire and brimstone sermons and other church rituals ensured that men were always the head of households. As the authors explain, “[a]t the heart of his cosmology was a strenuous effort to elevate, in sometimes twisted and exaggerated forms, the ideals of manhood he had learned to respect back in Coila" (106).
Sections 1 to 3 of Part 3 of The Kingdom of Matthias emphasize the importance of the theme of market capitalism to Matthews’s success as a cult leader. At this point in the book, both Matthews and Pierson have rejected Finneyism, claiming to speak for working-class and poor Christians who have been excluded from participating in or benefiting from market capitalism. Their resentment of the wealthier Finneyites, who claimed the new market system of capitalism had the potential to create more progressive and spiritually-exciting ways of worship, motivated them in their cause. Once again, these claims demonstrated Matthews’s failure to adapt to the new economic norms of this time in American history. Matthews’s involvement in the market revolution failed, so he bitterly resented anything that reminded him of this failure, which is why, in his Kingdom, money, merchants and society were all damned by God. He also condemned ideas inspired by the Second Great Awakening, especially any tenet that gave women a more powerful role in the home and the church. He was determined to isolate himself and his followers from these evil influences.
In these sections, more discussion around the theme of patriarchy and misogyny reveals Matthews’s extremism. At Mount Zion, the new home of the Kingdom, the community lived by extremely strict rules that revolved around a rigid patriarchal hierarchy created and enforced by Matthews. The core belief of the Kingdom asserted that Matthias was the Spirit of Truth, also known as God, and therefore, the father and patriarch of all his followers. Gender-specific roles and tasks meant that women tended to household affairs while men did more labor-intensive work out in the fields and conducted business in the wider community. Men at the Kingdom dominated the women, who were expected to assist the patriarchs by “bearing them children, preparing them food, keeping their houses spotlessly clean and obeying their husbands who are their only source of knowledge and material support” (96). As well, the women were expected to make themselves sexually available to men in the Kingdom who desired to partake in acts of wife-swapping.
The character of Isabella Van Wagenen is introduced in these sections. Also known as Sojourner Truth, Van Wagenen is best known in American history as a civil rights activist and abolitionist.
By these authors