73 pages • 2 hours read
David GrannA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
The book describes at length the racism of white people toward Indigenous people, which presented both through official governmental policy and through more informally demonstrated attitudes.
While the book focuses on the period in the early to mid-20th century when many Osage people were killed, Grann’s overview of the history of the Osage Nation shows the extent of past and contemporary policies that saw Indigenous residents of North America as second-class citizens. From the repeated reneging on the terms of treaties, to the forcible relocation of Osage tribe members onto smaller and smaller parcels of land, the US federal government had long used bigotry to support unfair treatment. In Mollie Burkhart’s lifetime, other policies came into effect that attempted to disrupt Indigenous hierarchies, culture, and power structures. Land allotment broke up communitarian living, and white boarding schools all but kidnapped Indigenous children with the aim of deracinating them. Finally, the system of guardianship, in which white men were assigned legal control over the financial affairs of many Osage people who had come into oil wealth, codified into law the racist stereotype that Indigenous people were too “primitive” to handle their wealth responsibly. Law enforcement and legal institutions were likewise influenced by such racism. Even Bureau agents, whose investigation managed to uncover some of the murderers, bought into these harmful ideas; one report noted that “Indians, in general, are lazy, pathetic, cowardly, dissipated” (117).
Also pervasive is evidence of less formal racism; despite its extra-legal character, this kind of bigotry allowed the conspiracy to murder Osage oil headright holders to be targeted by murderers, and then prevented timely justice. Grann cites contemporary newspaper articles not only gossiping about Osage oil wealth, but also applying derogatory bias to speculations about how the newly rich tribe members were spending their money. Accounts like these fueled resentment and prejudice; with the result that white community members were more likely to aid in covering up the crimes of the Osage Reign of Terror because of the low value they placed on Indigenous lives. John Ramsey, convicted with William Hale in the murder of Henry Roan, said that “white people in Oklahoma thought no more of killing an Indian than they did in 1724” (192).
The motive behind the Osage murders was money. The headrights for oil on Osage land—a kind of property ownership that could not be sold, and could only be inherited—represented immense wealth that was concentrated in the hands of Osage Nation members. Grann demonstrates that the proximity and inaccessibility of these riches—and the fact that they were owned by Indigenous people whom white Oklahomans did not view as equals—drew out the worst in people.
The lengths to which white residents would go to get their hands on Osage headrights ranged from financial fraud and chicanery, as evidenced by the falsified life insurance Hale took out on one of his victims and the various conmen eager to bilk Osage members out of their money; to marrying Osage women in order to become legal guardians of their property, as shown by the actions of the Burkhart brothers; to plotting the murders of extended families, as William Hale’s murderous campaign did.
However, Grann makes it clear that control of headrights was compounded by the corrupt economic system that pervaded the entire territory. The truly corrupt institution turns out to be the federal US government, which imposed a system of white financial guardianship on Indigenous people specifically to prevent them from controlling large amounts of wealth. Those white officials who were appointed guardians swindled and pilfered vast sums of money from their Osage wards. Guardians controlled not only what their wards could buy, but where they bought it; guardians were thus complicit with shopkeepers and businessmen in forcing their Osage wards to pay inflated prices for everything. Not even in death could the Osage escape such organized crime—even the cost of coffins and funeral services were likewise exorbitant.
Throughout the book, Grann makes it clear that the reverberations of past events were felt throughout the history he documents.
Institutions were deeply influenced by their organizations’ prior actions. For example, the mistreatment of the Osage Nation at the hands of the US government with regard to the racist guardian system traces directly back to century-old decisions to renege on treaties, push Indigenous North Americans off ancestral lands, and portray the continent’s original residents as inferior. At the same time, cutting ties with institutional history could sometimes yield positive results. Driven by the scandals embattling the Bureau of Investigations when he took office, J. Edgar Hoover was motivated to remodel the agency and to reestablish its image. This led him to direct resources and manpower to investigating the Osage Reign of Terror much more effectively than local and state officials had.
The main way this theme is illustrated occurs in the last section of the book, in which Grann speaks with several descendants of the victims of the Osage Reign of Terror. The effects of such traumatic events continue to haunt not only these individuals but the tribe as a whole. When Grann inquires about a missing section of a panoramic photograph in the Osage Nation Museum, the museum director tells him it’s because William Hale is depicted in that section and it’s too painful to have on display, stating that “[t]he devil [is] standing right there” (243). Grann’s research and findings about the widespread nature of the murders, and the fact that they took place over decades and involved many more people than originally suspected, allows him to bring a measure of closure to several of the descendants he interviews, ending the book on the optimistic note that they can finally leave the past in the past.
By David Grann