50 pages • 1 hour read
Vladimir NabokovA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Cincinnatus C. is the protagonist of Invitation to a Beheading. However, he lacks the agency of a traditional protagonist. The novel begins with his sentencing and charts his growing frustrations with incarceration as he approaches his execution. His passivity is an important part of his character, however, revealing how little power he has to overcome the might of the absurd totalitarian state that is trying to kill him. Cincinnatus’s suffering ties to the theme of Irrational Bureaucracy. He simply wants to know when his execution will take place, but even this information is denied him by the arcane and inefficient system that governs the jail. His failures, his suffering, and his struggles to gain any agency over his life become the social critique that forms the foundation of the novel.
The question of stopping the execution or reversing the court’s decision is never raised, as this is fundamentally impossible in the characters’ view. Cincinnatus wants to know the date and time of his execution, because having this knowledge is the closest he can come to having any kind of control over his life. His uncertainty about the timing of his execution looms over the narrative; he wants to finish the novel he is reading and complete the pages of scribbled notes he has begun, but trying to finish either project seems impossible to Cincinnatus when he might be executed at any moment. Even on the day of his supposed execution, he waits all morning only to be told that Pierre has been taken ill. Nothing can be depended upon, even when he has been promised that his execution will be soon. This uncertainty is maddening for Cincinnatus, so much so that he goes to the gallows still unsure of anything. By not setting a fixed time for his execution, the state continues to deny Cincinnatus the chance to invest his life with any purpose or meaning.
Cincinnatus’s time in prison serves to show him that there is no objective reality, and his subjective experiences of reality become the only thing he can rely on. At the end of the novel, the supposedly objective structures of the world, such as institutions and the fortress—even the integrity of the human body—finally break apart, and all that is left is Cincinnatus’s subjective experience. His death, in which the physical, objective Cincinnatus is left behind, beheaded, on the scaffolding, speaks to The Duality of Life Under Totalitarianism. The other Cincinnatus stands up and walks away, embracing his subjective unreality.
M’sieur Pierre is introduced to Cincinnatus as a fellow prisoner. However, unlike Cincinnatus, he is notably comfortable in the fortress. Whereas Cincinnatus despondently reflects on his life and his imminent execution, Pierre is more interested in swapping anecdotes and jokes. This amiable demeanor thrills Rodrig; the contrast between Pierre’s rule-abiding, agreeable disposition and Cincinnatus’s struggle to engage with the world around him is, to Rodrig, a damning indictment of Cincinnatus, and both Rodrig and Rodion hold up Pierre as the model prisoner. The contrast between Pierre the model prisoner and Cincinnatus the sullen grouch illuminates the absurdity of Cincinnatus’s situation. Not only is he sentenced to die, but he is also criticized for not being light and breezy like Pierre. It also shows why the society can no longer tolerate Cincinnatus’s existence.
The reveal that Pierre is actually Cincinnatus’s executioner is a cruel joke. After tunneling his way into Cincinnatus’s cell and giving Cincinnatus a sliver of hope that rescue is on its way, Pierre reveals that he and the rest of the staff in the prison have been delightedly manipulating Cincinnatus throughout his entire time in the fortress. For Pierre, however, the deception is an integral part of the execution process. He claims that he had to trick Cincinnatus, so that he could build a bond of trust between them, which will give more symbolic importance to the execution. Pierre presents himself as an artisan, someone who cares about far more than just the brutal reality of cutting off Cincinnatus’s head. For the craftsman Pierre, the process itself is part of a storied tradition that must be preserved. This conviction only adds fuel to his criticism of Cincinnatus, whose alienation prevents him from engaging with Pierre’s craft.
Pierre’s adherence to tradition is an important part of the novel. After the reveal of his true identity, he begins the execution itinerary in earnest. This itinerary is based on a long tradition of executions, and includes a lavish formal dinner in which both Pierre and Cincinnatus meet the city fathers. At the dinner, Pierre tells his favorite jokes for the umpteenth time while Cincinnatus barely engages with those around him. The dynamic is telling, as Pierre happily perpetuates the longstanding but unsatisfying traditions while Cincinnatus feels ever more alienated and alone, forced to socialize with the men who have condemned him to death. Pierre actually falls ill from the dinner, forcing him to postpone the execution in a symbolic critique of the traditions of the totalitarian society. Eventually, however, he manages to fulfil his duty. Pierre leads Cincinnatus to the scaffolding that has been erected in Thriller Square. In cutting off Cincinnatus’s head, Pierre liberates Cincinnatus from the institutions that he, as the executioner, represents.
Rodrig Ivanovic is the extravagant, personable prison director. Since Cincinnatus is his only prisoner (at least until the arrival of Pierre), Rodrig takes pleasure in overseeing every aspect of his confinement. Indeed, his own amusement is often more important to him than any sense of justice or institutional legitimacy. Rodrig wants Cincinnatus to be happy to be imprisoned, and when Cincinnatus does not show the requisite happiness, Rodrig is personally offended. Like Rodion and Pierre, he criticizes Cincinnatus’s attitude and demeanor and tries to shame Cincinnatus into playing along with his expectations. Eventually, however, his demands crumble in the face of Cincinnatus’s nihilism.
Rodrig is gifted an ideal prisoner in Pierre. Unlike Cincinnatus, Pierre revels in the absurdity of his imprisonment, and Rodrig is completely enthralled with Pierre, laughing loudly at his jokes and comparing Cincinnatus with him unfavorably. Pierre, Rodrig implies, is behaving exactly how Cincinnatus should behave. Later, however, the truth is revealed. Pierre is the executioner, not a prisoner. Pierre’s true identity reveals as much about Rodrig as it does about Pierre: Rodrig fawns over Pierre because Pierre, like him, is a guardian of law and tradition in the society; they are representatives of the same government that wishes to execute Cincinnatus, and they repeatedly trick him seemingly for their own amusement. Rodrig does not actually care about Cincinnatus’s wellbeing. Instead, his relationship with Pierre suggests that he is simply in love with the theatricality of the enterprise, employing his institutional power for his own amusement.
Whereas Rodrig’s is fascinated and amused by Pierre, Pierre seems to tolerate Rodrig at best. When Pierre and Cincinnatus return from the dinner with the city officials, for example, Rodrig is waiting for them. When Rodrig greets them, Pierre’s reply is curt. Later, Pierre is critical of Rodrig for adding an entry to the list of preapproved final wishes. The evolving relationship between Rodrig and Pierre suggests that even in the context of the absurd bureaucracy of a totalitarian society, Rodrig is too absurd, too self-involved, and too cruel.
Marthe is Cincinnatus’s wife, but their marriage is defined by her infidelity. Throughout the years they have spent together, she has had a series of lovers and she isn’t shy about hiding her affairs from her husband. On the many occasions when he has seen her with another man, she makes feeble excuses for her behavior. Marthe refuses to adhere to the traditions and expectations of the monogamous society, then dismisses any suggestion that she should feel ashamed of herself. Much like Cincinnatus, she refuses to operate according to social expectations. Her transgressive attitude to sex is a challenge to the same society that has condemned her husband. However, whereas Cincinnatus’s alienation drives him away from others, Marthe’s defiance brings her into close contact with many other people. In addition, whereas, Marthe rejects the idea that she has any agency over her actions, Cincinnatus’s agency is actively denied him.
Marthe receives the news that her husband is set to be executed by the state but, like many other characters, she seems unconcerned with his sentence. In the meeting where she is supposed to enjoy their final hours together, she allows her father to lecture Cincinnatus while she ignores him and talks to her lover. In their second meeting, she criticizes Cincinnatus for writing her a deeply personal letter. She is concerned that the rebellious ideas that he has formulated and expressed via the letter might in some way taint her. She fears death and prosecution, but only when she herself is in danger. After leaving the prison, she sees Cincinnatus one last time. As he is driven to his execution, she waves at him from the apple tree outside their house. Marthe’s indifference to Cincinnatus’s execution echoes a broader social indifference to Cincinnatus’s fate. Most people see Cincinnatus’s execution as just another bureaucratic procedure. Marthe becomes the most prominent and damning example of the society’s indifference to the seriousness of Cincinnatus’s fate.
Marthe is the embodiment of The Duality of Life Under Totalitarianism. The real Marthe and Marthe as Cincinnatus sees her are demonstrably two different people. The real Marthe is self-involved and self-excusing; the Marthe who exists in Cincinnatus’s mind is a loving and caring wife. Cincinnatus is able to project his hopes, fears, and anxieties onto this idealized Marthe, who can never disappoint him. As the real Marthe’s uncaring attitude is revealed over the narrative, Cincinnatus retreats further into fantasy.
By Vladimir Nabokov