50 pages • 1 hour read
Vaddey RatnerA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
From an early age, Raami views the world through the lens of storytelling. When the first Khmer Rouge soldier bangs on the gate of her compound, Raami believes he is a tevoda, a saintly figure from Cambodian mythology rooted in Hinduism. Once she realizes he brings no peace or joy, she thinks back to the figures of the Cambodian epic poem The Reamker, in which angelic devarajas and demonic rakshasas do battle. Of the Khmer Rouge, Raami recalls, “I wondered what they were really. Soldiers or peasants? Children or adults? They looked neither like devarajas nor rakshasas, the mythical gods and demons I’d imagined them to be” (34). Already, the simple binaries of good and evil found in ancient literature fail to explain the complexities of real life.
That a seven-year-old girl relies of storytelling to make sense of the world—especially one that’s falling apart before her eyes—is unsurprising. Yet Raami takes this to a whole other level thanks to her father’s influence. A poet whose own work is rooted in ancient Cambodian literary traditions, Papa instills in Raami an appreciation for how storytelling can help a person survive unspeakably trying times. In the open-air prayer hall, the morning after the family’s arrival at Prey Veng, the majestic sight of the early-hours fog as it flows in ribbons through the Buddhist temple reminds her of the heavenly Kingdom of Ayuthiya from The Reamker. When Raami asks if this is heaven, Papa replies, “At least its mirror image. If one glimpses heaven’s reflection on earth, then somewhere must exist the real thing” (71). Raami will repeatedly fall back on such hopeful aphorisms as the trauma of her ordeal worsens.
Yet Raami’s tendency to view her suffering and that of her family through folklore takes on a darker cast as the narrative progresses. For example, she justifies her father’s decision to give himself up to the Khmer Rouge as a sacrificial act akin to the Buddha sacrificing his body as a rabbit to a starving Brahmin, who is in fact the Vedic deity Indra in disguise. Given that the rabbit incarnation ends up living on the moon, Raami too believes the spirit of her father lives on the moon. But it is her association between the moon and Papa that causes her to feel compelled to be alone at the Stung Khae harvest festival and to leave Radana unattended, which results in Radana’s death. After the mosquito attack, Mama acknowledges Raami’s unhealthy fixation on stories, which she received from her father. Mama says, “Yes, your papa may have brought you wings, Raami. But it is I who must teach you to fly. I want you to understand this. This is not a story” (206).
Although Raami ultimately becomes more of a realist like her mother—a transformation seen in her rejection of Queen Grandmother’s banyan prophecy—folk stories continue to serve her as a tether to Papa’s memory. And Ratner herself understands the power of storytelling. In the Q&A at the end of the book, Ratner says that during the most difficult times living under the Khmer Rouge, she used stories as incantations. Ratner writes, “Stories were magic spells, I felt, and storytelling, the ability to tell and recall something, was a kind of sorcery, a power you could use to transform and transport yourself” (339).
There is little doubt who is to blame for the suffering unleashed on Raami’s family and millions of other families during the Cambodian genocide: Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge. Pot’s radicalization as a far-left Communist, China’s support of the Khmer Rouge, and the US’s withdrawal from Southeast Asia after the quagmire in Vietnam are all political factors that contributed to the dire conditions in Cambodia from 1975 to 1979. Yet to the individuals on the ground affected by these political calamities, the trauma is frequently seen in personal terms. For example, when Papa gives himself up to the Khmer Rouge for execution, the family cannot help but blame Raami—this, despite the fact that Raami is a seven-year-old girl caught up in horrifying circumstances she cannot possibly understand. Even when Mama acknowledges the ridiculousness of blaming Raami for Papa’s death, she goes on to blame Papa himself for his role in his own demise.
Papa too cannot help but view what is happening to his family as a personal attack on him that is rooted in karmic retribution. He fixates on the story of Sambath, as if his failure to protect the young boy from the beatings of a school guard is the cause of the deteriorating situation in Cambodia. He tells Raami, “I could have kicked and scratched the guard. Could have taken the blows of his club myself. But I did none of those things. Instead, a man beat a boy because of my name. And, sooner or later, I’ll have to answer for the injustice of it all” (106).
The personalization of the political emerges on the side of Khmer Rouge as well; specifically, in the character of the Fat One, whose spite and verbal cruelty toward Mama makes her suffering all the more painful. When Raami perceives similar spite—which she refers to as “Kum”—in the leader of her youth brigade, she writes:
Yet it was not guileless or without purpose. I’d seen it before—in the Fat One’s snicker when she eyed Mama’s loveliness, in Mouk’s scar when it leapt to destroy the district leader, and now in this girl’s rage when she saw others pity me. Again and again it appeared in different faces, young and old alike, the vectors of Revolutionary venom, spreading like a disease, expedient and merciless as that from the bite of a death-carrying mosquito. And even if it was petty, it was obvious that when propped up and given the right platform, pettiness became poison (294).
Here, Raami keenly identifies how political movements that lead to widespread, incomprehensible slaughter are rooted in personal grievance—grievance toward those who have more, those who have less, foreigners, or people who are simply different. The pettiness is like adding insult to injury. Yet more accurately, the genocide was always rooted in that pettiness to begin with.
Pol Pot’s stated goal was to transform Cambodia into an agrarian utopia, where the simple homespun values and agricultural expertise of the base people like Pok and Mae spread throughout the entire country. Theoretically, this would lead to an unprecedentedly productive citizenry that would make Cambodia the jewel of Southeast Asia. Moreover, the bounty of this economic prowess would benefit all Cambodians equally.
Yet in practice, the Khmer Rouge only further stratified Cambodia’s unequal demographics by stripping wealthy and middle-class urbanites of their status and belongings and using that wealth to fund poorly planned military operations against its neighbors and to implement ill-begotten agricultural practices. These aggressive rice-planting strategies rejected the knowledge and expertise of the supposedly vaunted base people, leaving them to suffer the same shortages and later famines as the rest of the country.
The hypocrisy of the Khmer Rouge is evident, though it is also an open question how much of these outcomes are the result of the hypocritical corruption of local Khmer Rouge leaders versus mere incompetence at the higher levels of the organization. Yet in some ways, the two are related. The decentralized nature of the Khmer Rouge made it impossible to police the activities of local leaders. As a result, personal hypocrisy ran rampant, reflected most starkly here by Bong Sok and his wife, the Fat One. When Raami and Mama visit Bong Sok’s compound, they see a rich abundance of rice and cassava, even as Pok and Mae receive meager food rations. These local leaders, like many others the family encounters, also enjoy the material luxuries that the Khmer Rouge so openly disdains (at least if its propaganda is to believed). The ultimate insult comes when Mama sees the Fat One’s daughter squeezed into Radana’s funereal dress, despite the Fat One dismissing the deceased girl’s possessions as “bourgeois luxury.”
All of this hypocrisy reflects the extent to which the Khmer Rouge, rather than a good-faith experiment in egalitarianism, was really the agent of an authoritarian power-grab. The mass killings of former political, military, and royal leaders like Papa came out of a desire to purge Cambodian society of anyone who might challenge the Khmer Rouge’s dominance, despite the purges framing as necessary for transforming the country into the promised agrarian paradise. This is tragically consistent with other mass killings in Communist countries in the 20th century, including the 1936-38 Great Terror under Soviet leader Josef Stalin which killed up to 1.2 million people, and a series of purges in China under Mao Zedong in the 1960s that led to millions of deaths.
Asian History
View Collection
Books About Art
View Collection
Coming-of-Age Journeys
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Historical Fiction
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Vietnam War
View Collection