logo

71 pages 2 hours read

Daniel Immerwahr

How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

IntroductionChapter Summaries & Analyses

Introduction Summary: “Looking Beyond the Logo Map” Summary

In the Introduction, Daniel Immerwahr dissects an important event in US history: the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. That day, Japan attacked Hawaii and other American territories: Wake and Midway Islands, Guam, and the Philippines. In fact, unlike Pearl Harbor, Japan invaded and controlled the Philippines until 1945. The author thus argues that “Pearl Harbor” is, first, a misleading name of the event and, second, the disregard for the other targets highlights the hidden American Empire.

In fact, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s speech changed his “Infamy” speech about the bombing to prioritize Oahu, Hawaii, and demote the Philippines by mixing “US and British territories together, giving no hint as to which was which” (5). The author argues that Roosevelt “felt a need to massage the point” about Hawaii because he “was clearly worried that his audience might regard Hawaii as foreign” (6). At that stage, Americans interpreted mainland America as more American than the islands, so Roosevelt emphasized “the American island of Oahu” (6).

Until the early 20th century, leaders like Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson explicitly called the US overseas possessions “colonies” (7). However, that language began to change in favor of “territories” around 1914 because the government believed that “[t]he word colony must not be used to express the relationship which exists between our government and its dependent peoples” (6).

The US logo map excludes the American overseas islands and makes Alaska appear smaller than its actual size. The author describes the United States as “a partitioned country, divided into two sections, with different laws applying to each” (10). Interpreting America as “the Greater United States,” which includes Puerto Rico and the Philippines, means that “race has been even more central to US history than is usually supposed” (11).

As a result, How to Hide an Empire “aims to show what the US history would look like if the ‘United States’ meant the Greater United States” (16). The author calls this history a story “told in three acts”: westward expansion; annexation of Alaska and parts of Spain’s former overseas empire, such as Guam and Puerto Rico; and America’s distancing itself from a formal empire through globalization (16).

Since World War II, the United States has engaged in military operations over two hundred times. In the 21st century, the US maintains approximately 800 military bases all around the world. Some are “staging grounds, launchpads, storage sites, beacons, and laboratories” (18). However, since the early 1900s, the US has generally refrained from the term “empire” because it perceives itself as a republic, delegating the imperial status to others such as the Soviet Union, President Ronald Reagan’s “evil empire” (20).

Introduction Analysis

The goal of the Introduction is to set the parameters of Immerwahr’s investigation—the Greater United States. By tracing the development of the United States and its “territories,” the author reexamines the big questions in American history such as identity (national, racial, ethnic, and regional), colonialism, globalization, and foreign policy. He highlights the chasm between the mainstream American perception of itself as a republic rather than an empire and the realities of American foreign policy. The author traces the annexing of multiple islands for a formal empire and, after World War II, the US government’s discarding of some of its overseas territories in favor of less formal domination through economic, cultural, and linguistic means, as well as directly via military bases.

One of the persistent side-effects of American “confusion” about its imperial status is the use of the watered-down term “territories” rather than “colonies.” This term first appears during the westward frontier drive and stays for a good part of the 20th century to describe offshore “possessions.” This euphemism had practical jurisdictional implications, with some laws applying to the territories while others did not. In this way, Immerwahr’s book fits into the genre of borderland history by focusing on the marginalized communities outside the American mainland symbolized by the logo map.

The author gets at the very core of the question: what is America—the mainland or the Greater United States? This question has profound socioeconomic, ethnocultural, and racial implications in the broader framework of American history. By including the Greater United States, the author reaffirms the centrality of race to American history.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text