58 pages • 1 hour read
Jodi PicoultA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Content Warning: This section of the guide discusses violence against people with autism.
Jodi Picoult is an American author. Born on May 19, 1966, in Nesconset, New York, Picoult discovered a passion for writing at a young age. She graduated from Princeton University with a degree in creative writing and went on to pursue a master’s degree in education from Harvard University.
Picoult’s writing career took off with her debut novel, Songs of the Humpback Whale, published in 1992. Since then, she has authored numerous bestsellers across a variety of genres, including contemporary fiction, medical dramas, and legal thrillers.
Known for her research and exploration of complex moral and ethical dilemmas, Picoult’s novels often tackle controversial subjects such as racism, abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and disability. House Rules is no exception since it explores ableist discrimination in the legal system.
One of her most acclaimed works, My Sister’s Keeper (2004) explores the moral complexities surrounding organ donation and family dynamics. The novel spent over 100 weeks on the New York Times Best Seller list and was adapted into a movie starring Cameron Diaz, Abigail Breslin, and Alec Baldwin in 2009.
Likewise, her novel Small Great Things (2016) addresses issues of race, privilege, and prejudice in America and received the NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Literary Work. The story was also optioned for film adaptation.
House Rules explores the intersection of autism and the American legal system along with the impact of an autism diagnosis on a family and an individual. Autism (often commonly referred to as Autism Spectrum Disorder, or ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition. Common symptoms of autism include:
In House Rules, Jacob experiences all these symptoms. Because autism is a spectrum condition, symptoms can manifest in different ways from one person to another. Furthermore, people with autism often experience a different variety of symptoms depending on their gender. These differences have historically created a gendered gap in the diagnosis of autism and the perception that only boys can have autism. Because girls are often socialized to be polite, friendly, and agreeable—while boys are given more freedom to display quirky or even destructive behavior—autistic traits in girls are often misidentified.
Many fictional representations of autism reinforce common stereotypes. Because characters with autism are overwhelmingly white and male, there is little acknowledgment of the reality that girls and people of color have autism as well. However, even when boys with autism are represented in literature, their portrayal is often one-dimensional and limited. In many cases, such as in the film Rain Man (1988), they may have savant-like abilities and be unable to live outside of a mental health facility.
House Rules’s portrayal of Jacob exhibits these stereotypes. Jacob is white and male, and he experiences significant challenges in daily life. He is highly intelligent, but he also lashes out with physical violence in response to upsetting stimuli, which reinforces the perception that people with autism are violent and largely incapable of living a “normal” life. Jacob’s challenges are presented as so severe that his younger brother expects to be responsible for Jacob’s care in the future after their mother passes away. While Picoult may accurately depict some aspects of the autistic experience, Jacob does not represent every person with autism.
While Jacob’s characterization is largely stereotypical and cannot be interpreted as a true reflection of autism, some aspects of House Rules are accurate. For example, many common signs of autism—such as discomfort with eye contact and difficulty understanding unspoken social cues—can be interpreted as guilty behavior in the context of a police investigation. This fact inspired the creation of House Rules, as Picoult explains:
I have a cousin who’s autistic. Several times, my aunt found herself in a public place trying to control one of his meltdowns—and people who didn’t understand why she was restraining him contacted authorities and made allegations of abuse. As he got older, and moved into a group home, his frustrations became more intense because of his size—he’d break in windows with his fist, for example—and several times the police were called.
It got me thinking that the legal system works really well, if you communicate a certain way. But if you don’t, it all goes to Hell in a handbasket really quickly. A lot of the hallmark behaviors of autism—flat affect, stimming, not looking someone in the eye—could very easily be misinterpreted as signs of guilt (“A Conversation with Author Jodi Picoult.” Amazon.com).
In addition to her personal experience with autism, Picoult also conducted research to ensure that her characterization of Jacob was accurate. During an interview with Indy Week, Picoult detailed her research process, paying particular attention to her conversations with more than 50 teenagers with autism and their families. Picoult said that these discussions generated hundreds of pages worth of first-person accounts and added, “Many of the observations went into the book, because they said it better than I could myself” (Smith, Zack. “Jodi Picoult Discusses Asperger Syndrome and Her New Novel, House Rules.” Indy Week, 6 Mar. 2010).
Jodi Picoult’s interviews make it clear that she has conducted research. However, House Rules was researched and published in 2010—and mainstream understanding of autism has evolved significantly since the early 2000s. Consequently, many of the terms and views reflected in House Rules are outdated and offensive.
For example, in keeping with a common practice during the 2000s, the novel uses the terms “Asperger’s” and “autism” interchangeably. Today, the term “Asperger’s” is often considered offensive because of its namesake: Nazi researcher Hans Asperger. Asperger’s connection to Nazi eugenics went undiscovered for years until a thorough investigation into his research revealed that he first identified traits of autism in the context of systematically murdering neurodivergent children. Contrary to initial assumptions, Asperger was not an early pioneer of autism research; he experimented on children with autism and used them as examples of people who should be eradicated in the name of racial purity.
Prior to this discovery, the term “Asperger’s syndrome” was often used in conjunction with another set of offensive terms: “low-functioning autism” and “high-functioning autism.” These terms were used to explain the varying range of symptoms experienced by people on the autism spectrum, some of whom are nonverbal while others—like Jacob—can communicate but in a different way from neurotypical people. Originally, these terms were clinical classifications used to denote the varying impact of symptoms of autism. However, these terms have faded from use because many people with autism view them as offensive. For instance, to say that someone is “low-functioning” is belittling. Likewise, it is infantilizing and demeaning to describe someone else as “high-functioning” for their ability to hold down a job or attend public school. Many people with autism also feel that these terms represent a discriminatory, clinical view of autism; when someone is described based on their functional ability, their worth is essentially being quantified in terms of the burden their existence places on society. So, although the terms “low-functioning” and “Asperger’s syndrome” are used throughout the book, these terms are offensive and no longer used by the majority of people with autism.
In Part 2 of House Rules, Emma also reflects on the idea posed by some people that vaccinations can cause autism. Her reflections on the autism-vaccine controversy introduce questions of uncertainty and misinformation surrounding the causes of autism. Her observation that both Jacob and Theo received the same vaccinations but only Jacob has autism underscores the notion that autism’s origins are multifaceted and not easily explained by simplistic theories. Furthermore, although Emma concludes that she doesn’t think that there is a link, this scene perpetuates unfounded links between vaccines and autism. There is no scientifically proven link between vaccinations and autism ("Frequently Asked Questions about Autism Spectrum Disorder." CDC, 2024). A study published in 1998 by British medical journal The Lancet linking the MMR vaccine to autism was retracted in 2010 after it was found that several elements were “incorrect” and “some of Wakefield’s research was funded by lawyers acting for parents who were involved in lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers” (Eggertson, Laura. “Lancet Retracts 12-Year-Old Article Linking Autism to MMR Vaccines.” CMAJ, vol. 182, no. 4, 2010). The study was retracted a month before the publication of House Rules.
By Jodi Picoult