logo

32 pages 1 hour read

Henrik Ibsen

Ghosts

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1881

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Act IIAct Summaries & Analyses

Act II Summary

After dinner, Helen and the pastor discuss what to do to stop Oswald and Regina’s love affair. Helen confirms that Regina is Oswald’s half-sister; her mother was Johanna, the servant accosted by her husband. After receiving $300 to stay silent, the maid married Jacob, the carpenter, who lied about being Regina’s father. When Manders expresses disappointment in Jacob’s choice to “marry a fallen woman,” Helen calls her marriage to Oswald’s father as a marriage to “a fallen man” (32). Manders rejects Helen’s comparison and reiterates that Helen’s marriage was one “in full accordance with law and order” (33). Helen expresses regret over hiding her husband’s immoral actions and calls herself a coward for not revealing the truth to Oswald. In opposition, Manders argues that it is Helen’s responsibility to protect Oswald’s esteem for his father.

As the two debate Helen’s next steps, Helen is haunted by the ghosts of her inherited beliefs and ideals. When Manders blames her “horrible, revolutionary, free-thinking books” for corrupting her (35), Helen explains that Manders’s push for her to return to her husband years ago led her to dissect her old belief system. She and the pastor also hint at their past mutual attraction and the pastor’s rejection of her. Avoiding the topic, the pair resolves that Regina must be taken out of the Alving home and married off.

Jacob enters and asks for the pastor to lead a prayer meeting at the orphanage. Manders confronts Jacob about Regina’s paternity and admonishes him for lying about it. Jacob confesses and justifies his actions: He wanted to help Johanna by marrying her; he also spent all of Johanna’s money from the Alvings on Regina’s education. The pastor forgives Jacob and promises Helen to return later. Jacob and Manders leave the stage. Alone, Helen discovers that Oswald has been sitting in an adjacent room the entire time.

Helen invites Oswald into the garden room. He confesses that he is ill and will never be able to work again: A doctor diagnosed him with vermoulu, a euphemism for syphilis, a sexually-transmitted infection. Although the doctor claims Oswald inherited syphilis, Oswald rejects this assumption and blames his own sexual past instead. Oswald has promised to take Regina to Paris and views her as “my salvation” (49). When Regina enters with a bottle of champagne, Oswald invites her to drink with them.

Oswald discusses the joy he has found in a life full of work and freedom from social mores. He cannot stay with his mother because she does not understand this due to the restricted environment in which she chooses to live.

The pastor returns from the prayer meeting and is shocked to find Regina sitting with the Alvings. As Helen prepares to tell Oswald and Regina the truth about them being half-siblings, Regina notices that the orphanage is on fire. Everyone flees.

Act II Analysis

In Act II, Ibsen continues to develop his commentary on The Hypocrisy of Organized Religion. Even after hearing about Helen’s husband’s full depravity, the pastor excuses him but expresses disgust at Jacob’s choice to marry Johanna, Regina’s mother, whom Manders describes as an immoral woman for having had sex outside of marriage. As Helen confronts Manders for his lack of condemnation for her unfaithful husband, Ibsen highlights religion’s unfair double standards for the sexual purity of women. Fearing that her son inherited his father’s depraved ways despite her best efforts, Helen begins to break away from the social conventions promoted by Manders. While Manders views Helen’s obfuscation of the truth to Oswald as a sign of her morality and sacrificial heroism, Helen now sees her silence as evidence of her cowardice. Helen blames her inaction on “the ghosts that hang about me” (35), a metaphor for The Dangers of Social Conventions.

Haunted by her duty, Helen resolves to tell Oswald the truth about his father, attempting to do so multiple times. Act II thus marks the climax of Helen’s character development. In the past, Helen followed the advice of Pastor Manders and returned to her husband to live a life of duty and honor. In the present, Helen boldly alerts Manders of her mission to forge a new path of freedom from social conventions. Despite his intentions to strengthen Helen’s loyalty to her husband’s memory, Manders’s myopic insistence on black-and-white morality inspires Helen to reevaluate her belief system. Helen compares interrogating her belief system, instilled by the church and society, to unraveling a piece of clothing stitch by stitch: “I wanted only to pick at a single knot” but soon discovered that the garment of doctrine “was all machine-sewn” (35). The idea of “machine-sewn” rather than handmade clothing highlights its unsatisfying one-size-fits-all approach to the nuances of real life; the church’s factory-produced dogma is inauthentic and rote.

Oswald is also hiding a secret: He was diagnosed with syphilis. In Ibsen’s time, well before the discovery of antibiotics in 1928, this bacterial infection was a devastating diagnosis, eventually leading to facial deformities and neurological problems. This is why Oswald would rather die by assisted suicide. Although syphilis could be passed from an infected mother to a child during birth, leading Oswald’s doctor to blame the condition on Oswald’s father (who presumably inflected Helen before she gave birth), it is much more commonly spread through sexual activity, which is why Oswald blames himself for the diagnosis. The ambiguity of the origins of Oswald’s illness touches on the play’s interest in what children inherit from their parents. Oswald's revelation confirms for Helen that her efforts to follow social conventions and protect her son from his father’s influence have failed. Her allegiance to social conventions alienated her from her son while he continued to suffer from the inherited consequences of his father’s indiscretions. Ibsen uses the French word vermoulu, which means “worm-eaten,” to describe Oswald’s illness; this word choice implies that Oswald has reached the final, neurological stage of the disease, which is why he cannot continue his work as an artist. The word also symbolically illustrating the rottenness at the core of the Alving family, the corruption that results from restricted desire.

The fire at The Orphanage at the end of Act II marks the climax of Helen’s development. It represents the destruction of Helen’s plans to honor her husband’s memory for the sake of social approval. Named after Oswald’s father, the orphanage represented Helen’s desire to separate herself from her husband without exposing the truth to Oswald. The orphanage offered Helen a way to escape her past with Pastor Manders as a partner and facilitator. However, the fire destroys their work and forces Helen to confront her cowardice. Purging Helen’s past allegiance to social conventions and religion, the fire offers Helen the chance to abandon her past and find peace.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text