logo

50 pages 1 hour read

Jeanette Winterson

Frankissstein

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Nature of Embodiment and the Search for Identity

The central debate in the novel is over whether it is possible to be fully human without a human body. The various characters, across both the 19th- and 21st-century storylines, embody conflicting responses to this question. Victor advocates for the self-sufficiency of the soul, arguing that bodies of any kind are unnecessary, though they could be used recreationally by those who want them in the future. Ron Lord takes the opposite view, arguing that bodies are entirely necessary to enjoy life. As Victor imagines freeing the soul (or consciousness) from the prison of the body, Ron creates sexbots that are essentially human bodies without the encumbrance of a soul. For Ry, both options are appealing. Ry deeply values his own transgender body, which he views as more authentically his than the body he inhabited before his transition. He insists both on the importance of the body and on the value of changing one’s physical form. All three options are given weight in the text, with other characters supporting and rejecting Ry, Ron, and Victor’s ideas, but the conclusion of the text leans into the importance of the body in self-identification. Beyond identification, the body is also needed for physical enjoyment of life, and Victor’s ultimate absence from the narrative supports the idea that the body is more precious than he implies.

Ron Lord is the most frequently dismissed character in the text, including in the last chapter section in which Claire consistently shouts at him to stop talking. Ron produces sexbots, and his basic argument for their importance is loneliness. Ron has a vision, in which he sees “armies of lonely men walking along a ruined road,” when “suddenly, down the same road, were all these beautiful girls” (237). The “girls” are sexbots, who “would never get old or ill,” “would always be saying yes,” and “never saying no” (237). While Ron’s sexbots raise important points about objectification and sexuality, his argument that embodiment is critical for socialization, happiness, and fulfillment is supported in the text. Even his sexbots, in his later story, develop personalities and feel fulfillment through the company of their masculine companions. Without bodies, as Ron attests, one cannot have sex, or cuddle, or sit and sip tea, all of which are deemed crucial for a full, human experience in the narrative.

Ry’s body is the most distinct example of the importance of embodiment, though some reviewers of the novel have argued that Ry’s self-identification as a “hybrid” misrepresents transgender identity. Consistently, Ry is content with his body and feels it matches his identity. Ry assures Victor that his previous body “didn’t feel like my body,” adding: “This one is my body, and I’d like to keep it” (282). Ry’s body is an expression of his identity, and even Victor appreciates Ry’s body, though often with a tone of fetishization. At the end of the novel, Victor disappears, making him literally bodiless, and Ry starts a relationship with Polly. Without his body, Victor misses out on continuing his affair with Ry, while Ry, still in need of the physical companionship Ron Lord obsesses over, can continue to find connections with others.

Redefining Humanity Through Technology

Like the original Frankenstein, Frankissstein explores questions of safety, ethics, and morality raised by emerging technologies. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, humanity acquires the power to create life, calling into question what it means to be alive, to be human, and to have a soul. In Frankissstein, both Victor Stein and Ron Lord do the same—with Stein seeking to create souls without bodies while Lord creates bodies without souls. In the early 19th century, Byron and Polidori disagree about the dangers of technology in the economy, as industrialization turns workers into machines. In the 21st century, AI threatens to make millions of workers obsolete, upending economies while eroding long-standing assumptions about the meaning of life, humanity, and mortality. As Victor describes his ideal future, in which humans are subservient to omniscient AI, living without bodies and without the need for physical interaction, the other characters push back, noting that Victor’s imagined utopia feels to them like a dystopia.

Throughout the novel, characters wrestle with the ethical implications of their work and with how that work shapes their identities. For example, when Ry tells Ron that he provides body parts for Victor, he adds: “I’m not a grave robber, Ron. Do you think I go to the churchyard at night with a crowbar and a sack?” (86). Although Ry is trying to assuage Ron’s concerns, his comment raises the question of why Ry’s vision of 19th-century grave-robbing is unethical while Ry’s actual business practices are not. The same issue comes up later with Victor’s brains, when he assures Ry: “Don’t Panic, Ry, I’m not a murderer” (185). Both Ry and Victor find opportunities within a changing technological landscape, and those opportunities force them to shift their understanding of who they are. These denials—not a grave robber, not a murderer—imply a deep desire to hold on to a stable, human self-image. Despite this shared desire, Victor’s grand plans threaten to undo any stable definition of humanity. These plans do not align with what the other characters want, and yet, if he succeeded in implementing his plans, they would all be forced to adjust to the change, much as the workers in 19th-century England had to adjust to machinery taking their jobs.

Though the novel presents limitations on technology as a comfort, they also provide a barrier that Victor may manage to overcome. Ada, for example, notes that if the Analytical Engine were to contain as much information as a human mind, it “would be as large as London” (324). However, Ada can also envision: “the machine as a city” adding: “We would be part of the machine and not separate from it” (324). The large factories that came to dominate the English economy in Mary Shelley’s lifetime serve as one example of people becoming “part of the machine.” An even more literal example comes in Victor’s tunnels under Manchester, in which people can live within machinery. Even 200 years before Victor’s experiment with Good’s head, Ada predicts an Analytical Engine that could understand and duplicate a human mind. As such, even as other characters doubt the specifics of technology in the future, the novel presents the inevitability that technology with continue to improve and continue to test the boundaries of humanity.

The Impacts of Misogyny and Anti-Trans Bias

The novel begins with a debate among Mary Shelley’s intellectual friends about the meaning of gender and the rights of women. Living in the early 19th century, Shelley is ridiculed for being a woman, must listen to sexist rhetoric from Byron and Polidori, and even has the authorship of her novel questioned because of the misogynistic belief that a woman cannot be a great author. Two hundred years later, Ry faces discrimination and sexual violence because he is transgender. Friends like Ron and Victor misunderstand and fetishize him, and strangers sometimes physically threaten him, such as the drunk man who attempts to sexually assault Ry at the diner. For both Mary Shelley and Ry—whose name derives from his birth name, Mary—gender prejudice impacts daily life.

At Lake Geneva, Mary fights a constant uphill battle against Byron and Polidori, with only periodic assistance from Percy. Byron, for example, laments that he has a daughter instead of a son. A young man can hope for a brilliant career, he complains, while the most a young woman can hope for is to marry well. Without considering the structural barriers that prevent women from pursuing careers, Byron disparages women as caring for nothing beyond romance and domesticity: “For a man, love is of his life, a thing apart. For a woman, it is her whole existence” (8). Mary Shelley herself stands as a clear rebuke to this sexist idea: Mary’s marriage to Percy does not define her, and in Frankenstein she creates a story that defines its era and long outlasts it. Beyond that, Mary lives a long and full life after Percy’s death, and Ada, the daughter Byron laments, succeeds as a mathematician. Nonetheless, Ada and Mary are notable exceptions to the “rule” Byron points to, while Claire Clairmont lives up to the expectations of men like Byron and Polidori. The issue, which Mary notes, is that men set up expectations for women that then serve to limit women’s perceptions of themselves and others, therein restricting their choices in life.

As a transgender man, Ry faces persistent gender discrimination in the 21st century. Ron, for example, tells Ry: “OK, no dick. So you’re not a bloke really. So what blokes want—well, it’s not about you, is it?” (85). Ron deliberately misgenders Ry, defining masculinity as entirely dependent on genitalia. In the process, he argues that Ry has no right to an opinion about how men experience desire. Notably, no one asks Ron about his genitals before allowing him to give any testimony on masculinity. Victor similarly claims the prerogative to define Ry’s identity for him, saying: “Now male, now not quite, now quite clearly a woman who will slip inside a boy’s body” (298). Ry himself has made clear that he never felt comfortable as a woman, and that his masculine identity is his true one. Victor’s unwillingness to believe what Ry says about himself stems in part from his own anxiety about his sexuality. Victor insists repeatedly that he is not gay, as if he fears that his relationship with Ry calls his sexuality into question. At the same time, he fetishizes Ry’s transgender body, calling him a “hybrid”—a label that many trans people reject and consider degrading. Winterson uses the split timeline of her novel—with one cast of characters living in the early 19th century and another in the early 21st—to show how misogyny and anti-trans bias limit the way women and transgender people are allowed to interact with the world around them. Both Mary and Ry are considered less than cisgender men and their access to move through the world as fully respected individuals is limited by this gender hierarchy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text