logo

41 pages 1 hour read

Joseph J. Ellis

Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2000

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 5-6 Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 5 Summary: “The Collaborators”

There are fears that the first contested presidential election in 1796, following Washington’s retirement, will tear the country apart, as real political distinctions between Federalists and Republicans come to the fore. The spirit of ’76 continues, and a chief qualifier for becoming president is having played a dominant role in the Revolution.

By the spring of 1796, the choice is between Vice President John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. On the face of it, they are very different. Adams is a short, stout, and candid New Englander, while Jefferson is a tall, willowy, elusive Virginian. Adams had made “American independence his life project” (164). He had been Washington’s vice president, a frustrating role that afforded him little power and influence and had come under suspicion that he wished to reinstate a sort of monarchy when he published a series of essays, titled “Discourses on Davila,” in which he argued that all stable governments required a “monarchical principle”—in other words, a single figure to embody the will of the nation (168). 

The essays are the reason for a serious rift between Jefferson and Adams, who had worked together to draft the Declaration of Independence and been close enough to seem “soulmates” (163). Also, Adams considers that Jefferson’s early support for the French Revolution makes him “‘a dangerous dreamer’” (170). Ellis concludes that “[c]hoosing between them seemed like choosing between the head and the heart of the American Revolution” (164). 

Whatever Adams’ and Jefferson’s presidential ambitions are, given the country’s strong anti-monarchical sentiment, they have to be seen to be nominated for the role. Adams is encouraged in his presidential ambitions by his wife, Abigail, his closest collaborator, and James Madison supports Jefferson’s presidential campaign. Both Adams and Jefferson feel awkward about being pitted against a former friend, but they are equally assured that their own vision for the country’s future is superior. 

When the results come in, Adams beats Jefferson with “a razor-thin victory” of seventy-one electoral votes to sixty-eight (178). Jefferson predicts that “whereas Washington had been able to levitate above the partisan factions, ‘the next president of the United States will only be the president of a party’” (182). Adams, on the other hand, hopes that he and Jefferson might join forces and share power, with Jefferson as his vice president. While Jefferson originally likes the idea, for him “ideology was trumping intimacy” as he seeks to gain leadership of the Republican party, which is oppositional to Adams, and pursue his idea of the Revolution to the fullest (183). 

During Adams’ term, there is ideological warfare between Republicans and Federalists, who each accuse the other of betraying the ideals of the revolution. Ellis considers that “the leadership of the revolutionary generation lacked a vocabulary adequate to describe the politics they were inventing” (186) and the government is too new and “ill-formed” to cope with the foreign policy challenges it faces (187). 

Adams makes the mistake of signing into law the Alien and Sedition Acts, statutes designed to deport or disenfranchise foreign residents. Irish and German immigrants, who have previously supported Adams, shift their loyalties over to Jefferson and Madison, who are setting themselves up as the Republican opposition. Jefferson and Madison are biding their time, waiting for Adams and the Federalist agenda to fail. Meanwhile, they organize their efforts. 

Jefferson runs against Adams in the 1800 election and wins. Although outside New York, Adams wins more electoral votes than he had in 1796, Jefferson wins all twelve of New York’s electoral votes. With Jefferson’s ascension, the “‘people’ replaced the ‘public’ as the sovereign source of political wisdom. No leader could credibly claim to be above the fray” (204).

Chapter 6 Summary: “The Friendship”

In retirement, Adams feels that Jefferson has betrayed him, and the two men do not exchange a word for twelve years. As for Jefferson, “his first term as president would go down as one of the most brilliantly successful in American history, capped off by the Louisiana Purchase” which effectively doubled his territory (212). His second term, however, brings a series of “domestic tribulations and foreign policy failures” (212).

Eagle-eyed, Adams jealously watches Jefferson. From a distance and in correspondence with Benjamin Rush, another signer of the Declaration of Independence, Adams is able to reflect that all the major players of the Revolution had been “making it up as they went along, improvising on the edge of catastrophe” (216). He thus begins the process of writing the revolution’s history. 

Adams considers himself to be the realist mirror to Jefferson’s romantic ideal, and there is a reconciliation and the ensuing correspondence to mark the occasion between 1812 and the end of the men’s lives in 1826. Their dialogue becomes “an argument between competing visions of the revolutionary legacy” (230). In Jefferson’s version, he and Adams fought shoulder to shoulder against the British Tories and served together in the ensuing national government. Jefferson considers his version of the Revolution more “progressive,” while Adams’ is more “Tory” (230). When Jefferson encourages Adams to respond to this view of events with his own story, Adams can offer only “glimmerings,” and so Jefferson’s becomes the most comprehensive story of the Revolution (230).

The letters of 1813-14 are on the topic of social equality and the role of elites in the new republic. Adams feels that elites in every nation are the driving force of history and will be in America. Jefferson responds by saying “‘there was a natural aristocracy among men’” based on “‘virtues and talents”’ and also the “‘pseudo-aristocracy”’ of Europe, which is centered around wealth and birth (234). The whole point of the American Revolution was to promote the former definition over the latter. Jefferson and his Republicans have grasped that the only kind of political elite permissible in America will be “one that repudiated its elite status and claimed to speak for ‘the many’ rather than ‘the few’” (237). 

Jefferson and Adams are loath to mention the subject of slavery in their correspondence, even though both foresee the challenge it will present to their Union and Adams discusses his support for abolition with other correspondents.

From 1820 onward, the correspondence between Jefferson and Adams gains an “elegiac, still-life pattern” where they reflect on the past (243). Both men prepare their private papers for posterity and die on the same day, July 4, 1826. 

Chapters 5-6 Analysis

Chapters 5 and 6 chart the collaboration, friendship, and rivalry of Jefferson and Adams. Ellis builds the picture that they are two very different men who complement each other and represent different aspects of the revolution. Following the retirement of Washington, who unequivocally embodies the American Revolution, voters are presented with a choice about how they want their revolution to evolve and which figure is best suited to represent them.

Sturdy, oak-like Adams is perhaps the more evolutionary, pragmatic option. His ideas in the Davila papers and letters to Jefferson indicate that he cannot imagine how notions of a centralized figure of power and an aristocracy founded on wealth and power can be entirely relinquished. It is difficult for him to imagine how the “American Revolution had produced a fundamental transformation in the human personality,” one that will sweep away the inequalities present in Europe (235).

Jefferson, on the other hand, is an idealist who wants to pursue the consequences of the revolution to the fullest, even if it means turning his back on Adams and putting ideology over friendship. He is loath to support any form of government that imitates the European monarchical systems and seeks to sow the seeds for a genuinely meritocratic nation. Unlike Washington and Adams, who see the American Revolution as being in one country, Jefferson has great hopes for the French Revolution and is gutted when Napoleon seizes power and styles himself in the trappings of an emperor. Jefferson’s singular blind spot in this endeavor is his silence on slavery, which he does not do enough about because he needs the cooperation of the South to hold the Union together. 

Jefferson and Adams’ friendship presides over “an experiment, a sail into uncharted waters” (248), and:

[o]ne would like to believe […] that each man came to recognise in the other the intellectual and temperamental qualities lacking in himself; that they in effect, completed each other; that only when joined could the pieces of the story of the American Revolution come together to make a whole (244).

However, they simply “outlived” their political differences (244). The tussle between pragmatism and ideology, which defines Adams and Jefferson’s debate, is symbolic of the challenges for the new republic and continues to define politics in the United States long after their deaths.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text