58 pages • 1 hour read
Jocko Willink, Leif BabinA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
During his first big operation in Ramadi, author Willink rides in a Humvee toward street fighting. The neighborhood is covered, not only in the “fog of war” (17)—the chaos and uncertainty of battle—but in a literal fog of dust and smoke. Charged with clearing the neighborhood building by building, Willink’s men face fierce resistance from mujahideen, “those engaged in jihad,” or “muj” for short, pronounced “mooj” (18).
Marines and Iraqi soldiers are caught in a vicious firefight with defenders of a building, and Marines prepare to bomb it. Willink senses that something’s wrong, and he and another SEAL move forward to enter the building. Inside is a squad of his own SEAL team. Out-of-position Iraqi soldiers had entered the building during fighting and had been shot at by the SEALs, and soon both sides had called for support. Willink tells the SEAL commander, “It was a blue-on-blue” (22), a case of friendly fire. Somehow, only one SEAL is slightly wounded. Though they’re rattled, Willink gets them out of the building, into a troop carrier, and onto their next assignment. He then explains the screw-up to the Marines and the Army commander.
The Army, Marine, and SEAL units continue forward, and the rest of the mission is a success, but the friendly-fire incident under his command weighs Willink down. At the battalion center, Willink receives an email ordering him to shut down operations while a Navy team investigates the blue-on-blue incident. Willink’s men had committed a “mortal sin.”
He prepares a brief explaining what happened. It turns out that some units, including the Iraqis, had altered their plans but failed to coordinate with others. It’s part of a long list of mistakes. Willink tries to figure out who’s to blame; finally, he realizes it’s his fault. At a meeting with SEAL team members and Navy investigators, he asks who is to blame, and several SEALs declare that it’s their fault. He tells them they’re wrong, that he is the only one to blame, and that it will never happen again.
Friendly fire is an ongoing reality, especially in urban warfare, but his SEAL team adjusts its procedures and, though later they’re fired on by accident multiple times, they always get control of the situation and prevent things from escalating.
A leader who takes responsibility for everything in a team project is the essence of Extreme Ownership. When a team member makes a mistake, the leader assumes responsibility and makes sure the member has the resources and training to avoid that mistake in the future. If any team members cannot improve, the leader must replace them. Leaders who take Extreme Ownership inspire group leaders under them to do the same. None of this is easy, but it works.
Willink later works with a vice president of manufacturing whose plans for improving production aren’t being realized. The VP explains that his managers resist plant consolidation for fear they’ll be farther apart and harder to coordinate, though he assures them that a video conference call will suffice. He also says they oppose his incentive bonus plan because skilled workers won’t make enough money and will be pulled away by recruiters, which will reduce the company’s well-known manufacturing quality. As well, resistance is high over his plan to streamline the manufacturing process.
Willink gets the VP to see that his explanations for the failures come across as excuses. If instead, the VP takes Extreme Ownership of every problem that crops up, he can fix those problems and move toward success. SEAL leaders who blame circumstances tend to have failed missions, especially because their underlings take the same attitude. Those who park their egos and take responsibility for every detail inspire the same in their subordinates, and the job gets done.
The VP struggles with this idea but finally accepts that the success of the project is entirely on him. He says as much to the company board, where he also lists the steps he must take to fix all the problems.
In SEAL training, Hell Week involves three straight days of constant activity and exertion with only an hour of sleep. Recruits are well prepared physically, but most drop out because they can’t withstand the mental challenge of “pain, misery, and exhaustion” (42).
After two tours in Iraq, Author Babin becomes an instructor at California’s Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training program. He oversees their Hell Week, where seven recruits on each crew must compete with other crews by carrying heavy inflatable boats across land, through obstacle courses, and offshore, paddling through heavy seas. Crew leaders receive complex instructions that they must pass along to their crews, and trainers scrutinize their performance for mistakes. Winning crews get a few moments of rest, while last-place finishers get extra physical duty.
During one session, Boat Crew II wins nearly every race; its members work well together, help each other, and, despite exhaustion, have smiles on their faces. Boat Crew VI, meanwhile, keeps coming in last; its team members, including the leader, complain, argue with each other, and look glum. The senior chief petty officer decides to switch leaders between Boat Crews II and VI. The Crew VI leader appears upset but immediately accepts his orders; the Crew II leader seems elated.
Crew VI promptly wins most of the next races; in second place is the old winner, Crew II. Good leadership makes the difference: “[T]here are no bad teams, only bad leaders” (49). Babin himself learned this when he went through Hell Week: He found that yelling less and instead encouraging his crew to focus fiercely on one goal at a time—a route marker, a beach landing—helps create a winning effort. He also realized that his team carried the mentally weakest members, hiding their weakness from instructors, which eventually affects those men on SEAL teams in real combat.
Harsh training can’t completely prepare SEALs for combat, where the life-and-death pressure is “immense, beyond their imagination” (51). During Babin’s tours, two SEALs under his command and one in a brother platoon die, which devastates him “beyond measure.”
Soldier Ryan Job, blinded by a bullet in the face, eventually returns to school, attains a business degree with a 4.0 GPA, marries the woman of his dreams, climbs Mount Rainier, and maintains his wonderful sense of humor. During later surgery to correct his war wounds, though, Ryan dies suddenly; this causes Babin agony beyond words. SEAL recruits can’t yet fully comprehend these tragedies of war. Babin teaches them what he learned of leadership and takes them to where two of his fellow SEALs lie buried near the training base in Coronado, California.
Babin discovered that teams do not what their leader preaches but what that leader tolerates. It’s important to set a high standard and have the team practice until it reaches the top level of performance. Focusing on teamwork gets members to help each other do better, and it prepares them to step into leadership roles later on. Leaders should create a culture of Extreme Ownership and constant improvement.
The CEO of a financial services company brings in Babin after a product launch goes badly and the firm loses money. Babin meets with key leaders and discusses the principle of Extreme Ownership. The chief technology officer (CTO), whose products have failed, doesn’t like the concept; instead, he pushes blame onto several factors within the company. Babin talks about the SEAL training course where the Boat Crew VI leader blamed circumstances, and his crew adopted that attitude and didn’t try to improve the situation until the new leader came onboard and redirected their thoughts from bickering toward problem-solving.
Meanwhile, Babin explains, Boat Crew II, already steeped in the concepts of Extreme Ownership and continual improvement, no longer needed explicit training from their original leader to keep operating at a high level. The Boat Crew VI leader, having moved to Crew II and watched his old team become winners, learned a valuable lesson and went on to a successful SEAL career.
The CTO insists that his people have already made the right decisions. Babin points out that, if they’re losing money on those decisions, then they’re not the right ones. The CTO is an example of a “Tortured Genius” who believes his ideas are brilliant but unappreciated, and who won’t see that those ideas clearly aren’t working. The other company leaders catch on to the Extreme Ownership concept, but the CTO complains to the CEO that such a belief can have “negative repercussions.”
The CEO finally fires the CTO and brings in a new one who shares the Extreme Ownership idea; teamwork improves, and the company climbs out of its financial hole.
SEAL teams train together until they know each other so well that they can work in combat as a “synchronized team.” They maintain their physical fitness with constant workouts, even in the field. They use the most advanced equipment, which gives them tremendous tactical advantages. During Willink’s first deployment in Iraq, they fight side by side with elite US and NATO units.
On his second deployment, his SEAL teams receive orders to work alongside standard Iraqi soldiers, some of the worst-trained and least-motivated troops in the world. Most Iraqi soldiers have mixed loyalties; many have families threatened by insurgents; some occasionally fire on Americans. Their uniforms are a hodge-podge easily confused with enemy clothing, and their weapons are rusty Soviet issues or cheap copies. Few recruits can do more than a handful of pushups. It’s Task Unit Bruiser’s job to equip and train them, but the SEALs lack faith in the mission.
Willink finally realizes that unless US soldiers train Iraqis in the field during combat operations, the Iraqis will never gel into a fighting force capable of protecting their country against insurgents. Willink tells his men that unless special operations forces want to protect Iraq for generations, they must build a domestic military that can do the job itself. Though such trainees will never be as good as SEALs, they’ll be “good enough.” If SEALS and other special ops teams can rout the Ramadi insurgents, newly trained and tested Iraqi troops can hold the city. Because Willink believes in the mission and explains it so it makes sense, his men believe in it, too.
Thereafter, all SEAL missions are carried out in the company of Iraqi soldiers. Some of the Iraqis make mistakes that endanger SEALs, like firing their weapons accidentally or over their shoulders as they run away. Other Iraqis abandon wounded comrades. On the other hand, they know how to open gates without loud explosives, can identify insurgents by their dress and mannerisms, and their mere presence guarantees approval for SEAL team operations in dangerous territory. Over time, locals switch their allegiance to the coalition forces; enemy operations dwindle, and the Iraqi soldiers begin to take over patrol duties. In that respect, the mission succeeds.
In business, all team members should be aligned with the goals of a project. Even a good one, if misunderstood, can fail, so executives must make the purpose clear to everyone. As well, lower-level leaders need to ask questions up the chain of command to ensure understanding of the mission and to provide feedback to the executives.
One business firm that later consults Willink tries to implement a compensation plan that middle managers hate because it appears to reduce sales pay and might drive sales reps to leave the company. Willink asks the salespeople to reason out why their leaders have launched this plan; they don’t know. He wonders if they’ve asked for the reasons; everyone admits they’re afraid that if they do so they will look incompetent.
Willink later chats with the CEO, a very capable and experienced leader who nonetheless believes that her managers will have no problem coming to her with any questions. He tells her they don’t understand the new plan and don’t believe in it; they’re afraid it will drive salespeople away. She explains that the plan penalizes low performers who, if they leave, won’t much affect the bottom line. Meanwhile, lower sales costs let her reduce product prices, which makes sales easier for the remaining salespeople. It’s a win-win. Willink convinces her to explain this to her managers; they ask one or two questions and quickly get onboard.
The managers realize that they should have asked for clarification, which is their job under the principles of Extreme Ownership. One manager says the CEO should have taken the initiative to explain her strategy; Willink points out that she did just that moments earlier, but that the managers can’t always expect her to be a mind-reader. It’s their job as leaders to make sure they fully understand the mission and explain it to their people. Otherwise, they let down the boss and the team.
Al Qaeda considers Ramadi to be the capital of their region of control, and they control two-thirds of the city. Coalition forces that try to regain neighborhoods suffer severe casualties, and US outposts on the road into town suffer constant attacks, many of them sophisticated, coordinated, and fierce, often culminating with a powerful truck bomb driven directly at an outpost. Army and Marine units almost always deflect such attacks, and they always fight heroically; Willink considers them true warriors.
Some American special ops units, including a few SEAL teams, consider themselves superior to the US general-purpose forces, and they refuse to coordinate with them. The authors make it clear to their platoons that Army and Marine troops are to be treated with “nothing but the highest professional respect and courtesy” and that SEALs are to “check our egos and work together” with those troops (92). Task Unit Bruiser makes it its business to support the main battle units in retaking the city; the result is good coordination and lots of help when the SEALs need it.
Camp Corregidor, located near the most dangerous Ramadi neighborhoods, contains Willink’s Task Unit Bruiser alongside members of the US Army 101st Airborne First Battalion. When word gets out about the camp’s successes, another SEAL team wants to join in, and they bring with them a highly trained and equipped Iraqi unit. One of Willink’s platoon commanders worries that the new SEALs will do better and take over. Willink replies that the enemy is out there, not among the friendlies, and that if the other SEAL team dominates, Willink will find a new task for his own people.
The new SEAL team, accustomed to informality, observes relaxed grooming standards that differ from the tighter rules of the 506th parachute unit and Willink’s own SEALS. The new soldiers also carry an attitude of superiority; they talk down to the Army troops and show no interest in learning from the camp’s experienced soldiers. They also refuse to coordinate with the other units but go out on their own. Within two weeks, the 506th colonel has them removed from his camp.
Task Unit Bruiser’s goal is to be confident, not cocky, and never complacent. Egos get set aside, and the team and its mission become primary.
Author Babin consults for a drilling company manager whose otherwise excellent field chief blatantly ignores office protocols, costing the company hundreds of thousands of dollars. The manager fears he’ll get in a fight with the chief, but Babin explains that he can correct the problem quickly by taking the blame for not explaining company needs clearly, then describing how the correct procedure saves money for the firm. This keeps the other person’s ego out of the conversation and puts the focus back onto the mission.
Extreme Ownership contains two sets of connected stories. The first set recounts the wartime saga of SEAL teams in Iraq and the lessons they learned about leadership; the second set tells how those leadership concepts apply to businesses and other peacetime organizations.
The first part of the book discusses the basic attitudes of Extreme Ownership: Leaders take total responsibility for effective missions; good leaders make good teams; leaders must believe in the mission; and they leave their egos at the door.
Extreme Ownership isn’t saying, “I do everything” or “nobody else has any influence over the outcome.” It says instead, “I’m dedicated to the successful outcome of this mission, and it’s my job to make sure that everything works and the plan succeeds.” This philosophy can be adopted by any team member at any level of authority: They can assume responsibility for the successful application of their part of the mission and support the team in any way they can. A team that does this has a high probability of success, but this happens because the top leader makes sure that the entire team is dedicated to success.
Chief among the failures of leadership is blaming others. Placing blame assuages the leader’s ego but doesn’t solve the problem; it’s the default position of a bureaucrat protecting turf rather than a leader taking initiative. Assuming responsibility means the leader sees to it that the problem gets fixed. It’s unlikely that the leader of a failed team who blames others feels as good about himself as a leader who first assumes blame and then corrects problems and moves on to success.
The solution to ego problems is to move the focus back onto the mission and how best to solve its problems. When everyone pulls in the same direction, things get done, and everyone shares in the pride. By parking one’s ego first, that ego gets amply rewarded later.
Most importantly, Extreme Ownership gives a leader the power to get things done. If every problem is fixable, then the project will succeed. It’s an amazingly potent attitude to cultivate.
In Chapter 2, when Boat Crew II has its winning leader swapped out for the losing team’s leader, the crew continues to be competitive, placing second behind Boat Crew VI, where the winning leader continues his successful ways. Boat Crew II doesn’t collapse after losing its terrific leader because Extreme Ownership is already instilled in the crew, and they need no further instruction from a leader to function at a high level. It’s also possible that the inferior leader, given a winning team, feels a burst of confidence that improves his leadership. In any case, the poor leader “had to seriously step up his game to keep up with such a high-performance team” (59). The leader-switch not only proves the power of good leadership, but it also inspires a poor leader to up his game.
This principle becomes clear during the US deployment in Iraq, where SEALs must fight alongside poorly trained, poorly equipped, poorly motivated Iraqi troops. This appears, at first, to be a political decision rather than a military one. Willink imagines Pentagon officials, isolated from the harsh realities of the situation on the ground in Ramadi, failing to understand what US forces are up against. Until Willink believes in the need to train Iraqis during battle, his team won’t follow through with it. Once he believes, his men do, too.
Though all SEAL teams are highly trained, toughened specialists in the arts of warfare and mayhem, not all platoons subscribe to the authors’ leadership principles. Many teams have traditions of informality that Willink believes cause laxity in discipline—which, in turn, can cause failures on the battlefield—and these teams betray an attitude of superiority toward Army and Marine units.
This violates one of Willink’s chief principles: that a leader must be humble to work effectively with others. It’s Willink’s Task Unit Bruiser that becomes the most highly decorated SEAL team in Iraq, and for good reason. Thus, the reader should be aware that the principles of leadership taught in Extreme Ownership aren’t identical with all SEAL teams‘ training.
The authors describe the purpose of SEAL teams in Ramadi in 2006 as assisting US Army and Marine units in retaking the city from al Qaeda and returning it to regular Iraqi authorities. The retaking of Ramadi was part of the Anbar Awakening, in which local tribal leaders, tired of al Qaeda terrorist cruelties, rose up and, in coordination with US and coalition forces, retook the province.
The Battle of Ramadi in 2006 is one of at least three battles for the city between 2004 and 2016. The 2006 fight involved al Qaeda forces against US and coalition troops alongside Iraqi soldiers. The city was recaptured by the coalition, but Iraq’s government lost Ramadi again in 2015, this time to an invasion by the jihadist army ISIL, a breakaway division of al Qaeda that, at the time, was busy conquering much of the territory surrounding the Euphrates River in Syria and Iraq. US and other forces used aerial bombing raids to support Iraqi battalions in finally retaking Ramadi in 2016.
The wisdom of US involvement in Iraq remains unclear, but there’s little doubt about the effectiveness of the SEAL teams sent there. Lessons they learned constitute at least something of value that US troops brought home.