logo

23 pages 46 minutes read

William Dean Howells

Editha

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1906

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Downfall of the Ideal

“Editha” is a study of how the ideal is often not only unfeasible but also damaging. From early in the story, Editha seeks to encourage George to enlist in the war to achieve “the completion of her ideal of him” (1). In making her argument, she paints a romanticized picture of America as a country that frees the oppressed and can never be wrong. War is not a breaking of the peace but a patriotic endeavor in which one proves one’s heroism and love of God and country. In order to achieve the ideal vision of her own life, Editha endeavors to mold George into “a hero, her hero” (1). She attempts to manipulate him into believing he is coming to the decision on his own, telling him she “couldn’t respect” (7) him if he enlisted just for her. She believes her leading him to this decision is enabling him “to perfect himself” (1). George, believing her sincere in her desire for “the highest ideal” (1), is susceptible to her manipulation, telling her, “When I differ from you I ought to doubt myself” (2).

Editha behaves in a way she imagines an ideal woman would behave. She offers a “generous sob” (2) at his desire to appease her. When he mentions he may die, she cries, “Oh, George!” and clings to him, “sobbing” (7); moments later, she tells him she is his “for time and eternity—time and eternity,” words that “satisfied her famine for phrases” (7). That Editha is proud of herself for “being equal to” the “tremendous experience” (3) indicates her desire to meet a romanticized standard. The shallowness of her behavior is perhaps most blatantly evident in her reflection that if he were to come back “with an empty sleeve, then he should have three arms instead of two, for both of hers should be for his life” (8). However, immediately after, she wonders “why she should always be thinking of the arm his father had lost” (8). Editha’s romantic sentiments are meaningless, serving only to satisfy her vision of herself; she cares about a hypothetical lost arm, but not a real one.

Mrs. Gearson, who was married to a Civil War veteran and understands the reality of war, temporarily disillusions Editha. Before Editha can, in a melodramatic fashion, throw herself to Mrs. Gearson’s feet, Mrs. Gearson chastises Editha for sending George off to be killed or to kill others. However, Editha’s dedication to the ideal is rejuvenated by the portrait artist who, expressing outrage at Mrs. Gearson’s behavior, helps dispel the “darkness” of “shame” in Editha and to enable her “to live again in the ideal” (11).

The tragedy of George’s death is exacerbated by his having sacrificed his life not out of sense of duty but to satisfy Editha’s romanticized vision of her own life. The story is critical of Editha and of those who selfishly exploit institutions and individuals for their own purposes. George, like many young men inspired by empty platitudes in the newspapers, is a means to an end. His death is therefore meaningless, and Editha has gained nothing from it.

The Farce of War

Howells was openly critical of the Spanish-American War, which he felt exploited Spain and disproved the concept of American exceptionalism. In “Editha,” the war is romanticized in the newspaper, whose sentimental statements are repeated by Editha in her conversations with George. War is depicted as the only alternative to “[t]hat ignoble peace,” which is “no peace at all” as long as “crime and shame [are] at our very gates” (2). It is described by Editha as “a sacred war” and “[a] war for liberty and humanity” (2). When George asks why “this thing [shouldn’t] have been settled reasonably,” Editha responds, “God meant it to be war” (3). To argue, she tells him, is “blasphemy” (3).

George is skeptical of not only this particular war but of all wars. He tells Editha that, though this war “seems peculiarly wanton and needless” (3), in fact “every war” is “stupid,” to the point where it makes him feel “sick” (3). He enlists in the war on a whim after attending a meeting expecting merely to “sprinkle a little cold water” (5) on those enlisting; he is swept away by their enthusiasm and becomes “the first convert to the war” (5). As he did the day they first discuss the war, George suggests he does not actually believe in the war and that he has enlisted only because “[a] man that hasn’t got his own respect intact wants the respect of all the other people he can corner” (7). Just as Editha encourages him to enlist to satisfy her own needs, George enlists not because he believes in the war but because he feels doing so will earn him respect.

Neither George nor Editha’s father believe the war will come to much. George tells Editha that “this isn’t going to be a very protracted struggle” and that they will “just scare the enemy to death before it comes to a fight at all” (7). Similarly, Mr. Balcom assures his wife that “[t]he other fellows will back down as soon as they see we mean it” (6). The romanticizing of the war thus leaves people blind to its realities.

The difference between the romanticized ideal of war and the reality of war is nowhere more clear than in the motif of the empty sleeve. George’s father lost an arm in the war, an injury that left his parents against war in principle. Editha sympathizes with injured soldiers in theory—she tells George that if he returns with an empty sleeve, he can have both of her arms—but cares little for them in reality, as she wonders “why she should always be thinking of the arm his father had lost” (8). Her hypocrisy is criticized by George’s mother, who tells Editha that girls never expect their men to die; rather, “[t]hey think they’ll come marching back, somehow, just as gay as they went” (10). The minimizing of those who suffer in war is evident in the telegraph they receive informing them of George’s death: The first skirmish in which he is killed is “telegraphed as a trifling loss” (9).

The romanticizing of war ignores war’s harsh realities and exploits the lives of the people who fight it for the purpose of glorifying an image—of America, of heroism, and of self. Sentimental platitudes about war therefore entice men into danger under false pretenses. 

Gender Roles in the Late 19th-Century

Editha encourages George to enlist in the war so that he can “perfect himself” by becoming “a hero” who is “worthy” (1) of having won her. To Editha, his worth is inextricably tied to his participating in the war. This is evident in her reflection that his enlisting would allow “for the completion of her ideal of him” (1). As she says goodbye to him in the train station, she admires his “soldierly” look, and his “manly eyes and the strong voice satisfied her” (8). George’s masculinity, and therefore Editha’s approval, is dependent on his participating in the war.

Editha hopes to accomplish this ideal without appearing to deviate from the role of the ideal woman, who is passive and obedient. Her insistence that he “be allowed to perfect himself” (1) suggests she wants him to enlist of his own volition, without her having to tell him to do so. She words her letter, in which she suggests she cannot marry him until he decides to enlist, so that her feelings are “implied” rather than “expressed” (4); she waits to give him the letter for fear that she is “pushing, threatening, compelling,” which is “not a woman’s part” (5).

After George enlists, Editha’s statement that he hasn’t “simply done it for [her] sake” (7) and that she “couldn’t respect [him] if [he] had” (7) indicates that it is not enough for him to enlist: He must come to the decision himself, without her guidance, to preserve not only her ideal vision of him but also of herself. By leaving him “free, free, free” (5), she ensures that he is the ideal man and she, the ideal woman. 

Patriotism as a Self-Interested Quality

In “Editha,” patriotism is often empty. Editha proclaims her unconditional love for America when she tells George America is to be supported whether “right or wrong” (2). In her letter, she tells him that she cannot marry him until he decides to enlist because “[t]here is no honor above America” (4). She paints America as a nation embarking on a “glorious” war for “the liberation” of oppressed people—unconcerned that she is “parroting the current phrases of newspapers” because she must solidify “the high ideal she had for him” (2). Editha’s patriotism is thus motivated not by true love of America but by its usefulness to her in making George “a hero” (1) who is worthy of having won her. Like her love of “Providence” (3), Editha’s patriotism is self-serving, demonstrated with vague, melodramatic sentiments without meaning or substance.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text