logo

30 pages 1 hour read

James Joyce

Counterparts

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1914

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Literary Devices

Repetition

James Joyce’s writing style incorporates repetition connected to Farrington’s consciousness. In a general sense, repetition contributes to the idea of cycles or repetitiveness in Farrington’s own life, as he is doomed to continue the same listless routine of work, drinking, and mistreating his family. Through repetitive syntax and expressions of need, Joyce evokes this sense of repetitiveness that Farrington feels. For example, it is made clear that Farrington is under the influence of alcohol and physically and mentally unsteady. Despite the distractions of his job and even the chaos of the pub, his mind singularly focuses on the means to obtain alcohol. Before it occurs to him to pawn his watch, he racks his brain in a repetitive manner, “He could not touch him for more than a bob—and a bob was no use. Yet he must get money somewhere or other: he has spent his last penny” (76). If he had not at that point realized the watch in his pocket had value, he would have continued the pattern of his ruminations.

 

Additionally, the repetition of the anecdote about insulting Mr. Alleyne must be retold and embellished upon in the pub. The repetition of the story will imprint it on all the men’s memories and doubtlessly be rehashed in the future. Even though Farrington is destined to grovel and debase himself the following day, at least his momentary spark of self-respect and rebellion will endure as the story is told over and over again.

Figurative Language

The descriptive language used to describe Farrington throughout “Counterparts” is volatile and that of suppressed violence. His fantasies early in the story about the fragility of Mr. Alleyne’s skull help create feelings of instability and repressed anger from the start. Joyce uses an egg metaphor for the man’s head before indicating Farrington’s desire to crack it open, remarking that “[t]he head itself was so pink and hairless that it seemed like a large egg reposing on the papers” (70-71). Following Mr. Alleyne’s admonitions, Farrington stares at the head, “gauging its fragility” (71). The figurative language highlights the vulnerability of Mr. Alleyne’s safety in the presence of Farrington’s rage, but it does not occur to Mr. Alleyne that he is in danger because of his elevated socioeconomic status. Nonetheless, the metaphor sets feelings of tension that will carry throughout the narrative, mirroring Farrington’s own constant sense of dissatisfaction and fury that is only satisfied when he releases his anger on his family. When Tom receives the brunt of his father’s rage it has nothing to do with serving his father a cold supper and everything to do with the insults that Farrington suffered as a working-class man in Dublin.

Parallelism

Parallelism is the use of syntax or grammar that repeats or parallels itself in order to add emphasis. Joyce employs parallelism from the first line: “The bell rang furiously and, when Miss Parker went to the tube, a furious voice called out…” (70). Not only does this literary device add to the tone, creating tension through the double use of “furious,” but it also contributes to broader ideas on the general repetitiveness of Farrington’s life.

Parallelism is also employed through dialogue and action. At work, Farrington endures the dehumanizing mimicry of his boss: “‘You-know-nothing. Of course you know nothing,’ said Mr. Alleyne” (74). The italicized font makes it clear that Mr. Alleyne is parroting Farrington’s own words back at him. It is the exact same framework that Farrington utilizes later in his discourse with his son, Tom, as “[h]e began to mimick his son’s flat accent, saying half to himself: At the chapel. At the chapel, if you please!” (81). Parallelism shows that the bullying that Farrington carries out against Tom is a learned behavior. When Mr. Alleyne throws Farrington’s words back at him with a mocking tone, it is so shameful and embarrassing that it drives him to a night of destructive behavior. However, rather than address his abuser, Joyce shows how Farrington disrespects his son in an identical manner.

Epiphany

Joyce’s modern writing underscores the philosophy of self-awareness to various degrees. These moments of insight are called epiphanies. Joyce’s characters in Dubliners often face the realities of the restrictions of their class, gender, and race. In Catholicism, if a young man experiences a spiritual calling to become a priest, it is also called an epiphany. Joyce represents the fallout of the epiphany for his characters, not as a spiritual awakening, but rather as a dire awareness of one’s limited situation. This social commentary about Irish potential reveals the limitations and restrictions of Dublin’s institutions.

When Farrington crosses the bridge on his way home from the pub, the events of the evening flood him, and rather than being revelatory, his epiphany reveals his frustration: “[He] spent all his money; and he had not even got drunk” (80). Instead of feeling regret or taking responsibility, though, he is overcome with anger, as “his fury nearly choked him” (81). Farrington is so entrenched in his addiction and plight as a victim of his circumstances that he misses the opportunity to see the epiphany as a turning point. Farrington has been so worn down by the degradations of his community that he is past the point of learning lessons or self-reflecting.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text