24 pages • 48 minutes read
Jorge Luis BorgesA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Maps, one of Borges’s favorite symbols, represent` the spatial relationship between Borges’s dual identities. Borges grapples with an internal identity that eludes spatial confinement. In contrast, his external persona, known as “Borges,” is firmly grounded in the spatial world, existing through his literary works and the places where his name finds a home. The author encounters this persona through documents, like academic rosters or biographical dictionaries. Though this persona is defined by Borges’s preferences such as his affinity for maps, Borges regards it as an inaccurate or “falsified” representation of himself.
Likewise, while often considered objective documents, maps are affected by the mapmaker’s lens. For example, maps can convey different kinds of information like topography, water currents, or political borders, selectively highlighting different aspects of the same land. Maps are also living documents that change as the world does—contemporary maps have more accurate depictions of landmasses than antique ones because more of the world has been explored, measured, and documented. Additionally, old maps include now-outdated place names like the USSR, Bombay, or Czechoslovakia. Finally, maps are often shaped by cultural context; for example, maps produced in North America sometimes center North and South America, splitting Eurasia onto the left and right sides of the map. As such, maps shape one’s understanding of the world and are likewise shaped by the mapmaker. Similarly, Borges’s persona is simultaneously shaped by his internal guideposts and the way readers interpret them.
As with maps, a temporal separation accentuates the distinction between Borges’s two selves. As Borges posits, the inner self is fleeting, ceasing to exist with a person’s passing. This death can be symbolized by an hourglass, which marks a finite amount of time before running out and stopping. In contrast, the external persona, “Borges,” endures indefinitely through the written word and the minds of others. Unlike the hourglass, this is a self-perpetuating image, functioning more like a clock. Herein lies a situational irony: Despite the universal desire of all beings to “persist in their being” (Paragraph 2), Borges believes that the part of himself that persists beyond death is an inaccurate reflection of his true essence. Furthermore, this surviving fragment lacks consciousness, existing as a mere echo of the person he was.
The tiger and the stone symbolize animate and inanimate existence, offering insight into a fundamental aspect of being. Borges conveys that “all things long to persist in their being” (Paragraph 2). Poetically, he assigns this sense of “longing” to both the tiger and the stone, even though longing is typically considered a uniquely human emotion. Nevertheless, the tiger and the stone embody the broad spectrum of existence, with Borges asserting that the ultimate aspiration of everything that exists is to endure eternally. The stone and the tiger may not be aware of this aspiration, yet it remains intrinsic to their very existence. While Borges is alive and animated, he also persists in the realm of the inanimate through his writing. Consequently, after Borges, the man, departs from this world, he will live eternally within the pages of his books and in the places where his name is inscribed.
By Jorge Luis Borges