63 pages • 2 hours read
Tom WolfeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Racial prejudice and disparities of class, race, and wealth are central in the text, driving forward its plot. Characters’ decisions are driven by their views on class, race, and social status. The narrative’s world is populated by characters from all walks of life, each with their own mannerisms, baggage, and outlooks. The result is a crucible of racial tension, where disparities begin to define people’s perceptions of each other.
In the novel, white characters carry a bias about Black people, in particular young Black men, and their prejudice sets the plot in motion. For example, Larry Kramer grows nervous when Black teenagers pass him on the subway train. Similarly, Sherman, the protagonist, seeks to insulate himself from the hybrid, multiracial world of New York. Sherman loves his WASP heritage and the bubble of wealth and privilege that cushions him. He associates the non-Manhattan world with crime and chaos. In an early scene, Sherman instinctively tenses up when a young Black man approaches him on the sidewalk. The young man is harmless, but to Sherman, he signifies a threat because of his race. The narrative ironically notes that the self-absorbed Sherman fails to see how he might appear odd to the young man since he is muttering to himself after the disastrous call to Judy. It is because of this bias Sherman has never bothered to learn the roads outside of Manhattan. Thus, Sherman finds himself lost in the Bronx, imagines the area as a hotbed of crime, and in a self-perpetuating myth, stumbles into an unsavory situation.
Relations between Black and white people are tense, but so are relations between other groups. For example, some Black people in the narrative harbor antisemitic attitudes, as revealed by the heckling experienced by the mayor, Judge Kovitsky, and Kramer. Further, Kramer looks down upon people of Irish and Italian origin, thinking of them as animals. Sherman thinks of WASPS like Freddy Button as inherently more trustworthy and judges his Irish lawyer Thomas Killian’s accent. Characters frequently judge one another based on preconceived notions about race and ethnicity, exposing how deeply ingrained biases shape interpersonal relationships and perceptions.
Wealth disparities fuel these tensions further. When Kramer and Weiss see pictures of Sherman’s apartment in Architectural Digest, they are struck by the vulgar display of wealth. Kramer notes that the hall is “big enough to put three of Kramer’s $888 a month ant colony in, and it [is] only a hall” (448). Sherman’s privilege rankles the poorly paid government officials to the extent that Kramer decides Sherman is “heading for a collision with the real world” (448). Ironically, while Sherman’s wealth makes Kramer feel inadequate, Sherman himself feels overawed by the money of the likes of the Bavardages. To convey the impression that they are the social equal of the Bavardages, Sherman, and Judy live far beyond their income. Sherman’s expensive apartment is under a crushing mortgage and Judy’s revamp of the apartment has left the couple with very few savings. After Sherman realizes his American dream is precarious, he begins to look at his expenses in a new light, thinking of himself often as “hemorrhaging money.” Sherman’s quandary indicates that the racial and class disparities of his world are untenable and bound to erupt in what Reverend Bacon terms “the steam.” Unless inequalities are addressed, the steam will explode.
One of the fallouts of morally corrupt institutions in the novel is that while justice is endlessly debated, it is hardly ever delivered. Henry Lamb dies, Sherman gets arraigned for manslaughter, and the upright Judge Kovitsky is “soundly defeated” in his reelection attempt. On the other hand, the power-hungry Weiss is reelected with a resounding win, and Peter Fallow wins the Pulitzer Prize. This mockery of justice is a result of moral and internal corruption that infects the criminal justice system, people’s alliances, Wall Street, and the media.
In the novel, the criminal justice system is depicted as morally corrupt because it operates on the principle that most defendants are guilty. Kramer believes that “95 per cent of the defendants who [get] as far as the indictment stage, perhaps 98 per cent, [are] truly guilty” (110). Kramer’s opinion shows how government officials are already predisposed against defendants. Driven by their biases, officials in the novel want to settle cases for corrupt reasons such as power, rather than the idea of justice. An example of power subverting justice is Weiss ignoring the information that Roland Auburn planned a robbery attempt against Sherman. In his hunger to be reelected, Weiss ignores the complex truth of the Sherman-Henry Lamb case.
Sherman represents the corruption of the capitalistic system of Wall Street, where people make immense amounts of money through dubious bond trading. Although Sherman sometimes questions the ethicality of the trading, he quells the doubt with dreams of social aspiration. Sherman also ignores the social imbalances in his workplace. The narrator notes, “The fact that not one of the eighty members of the Bond department was Black or female didn’t bother [Sherman]. Why should it? It didn’t bother Lopwitz” (65). Because his workplace offers him money and power, Sherman does not question its corrupting influence. Even Judy, who acts as Sherman’s moral compass in the novel, is prone to the corrupting effect of easy money. Sherman notes that while Judy looks down upon his job, she has no qualms about spending the income from it on status-improvement exercises.
Even the press and public advocacy groups like that run by Reverend Bacon are caught up in the murk of moral and institutional corruption. Not only does Bacon siphon money from the Episcopal diocese, but he invests it in the very system of white capitalistic power he publicly denounces. Bacon also has ties with lawyers like Abe Vogel and TV channel producers like Irv Stone from Channel 1 TV. He uses the network to further his image as a champion of the Black people of Harlem and the Bronx while doing little to improve their lot. The moral corruption of the press is symbolized by Peter Fallow, The City Light, and various TV channels, like Channel 1. In an example of sensationalistic journalism, Fallow publishes Maria’s identity even before she appears in court for the Henry Lamb case. While the corruption in the novel is not necessarily financial, it is inseparable from status, power, and wealth. People may not be shown accepting bribes, but they use coercive methods and threats of power and reward to keep the status quo running.
In The Bonfire of the Vanities, author Tom Wolfe presents a world so occupied with surfaces and appearances that its core turns hollow. With image, status, wealth, and power dominating the motivations of characters, ethics and morals retreat far into the background.
The contrasting fortunes of Sherman and Kramer illustrate this moral vacuity. At the start of the novel, Sherman is treated like a star by most people because of his social capital. Kramer, on the other hand, feels devalued by his meager ADA salary and Weiss’s dismissive attitude toward him. However, as the plot unfolds and Sherman loses his status, he is shunned by his high-society associates. Pollard Browning, the head of his apartment co-op, wants Sherman to leave the apartment as Sherman is detrimental to the Park Avenue vibe. The parents of his daughter Campbell’s friend won’t “even let Campbell come play” (575). Even when high-society peers do show an interest in Sherman, their interest is voyeuristic. For example, Sherman’s boss, Gene Lopwitz, eagerly listens to the tale of his downfall, and the dinner guests at the di Duccis lap up the story of Sherman’s trip to the courthouse.
On the other hand, as Kramer gains prominence through his pursuit of Sherman, his social capital with Weiss grows. Not only does Weiss begin to talk to Kramer, but he ultimately invites Kramer to meetings alone without Bernie Fitzgibbon. Kramer also gets media coverage and is seen as a defender of Black and minority ethnic communities. Paradoxically, the rise in Kramer’s status is accompanied by a breakdown in his morals. It is suggested Kramer was once idealistic, which is why he chose to work with the government rather than a private law firm. Yet, the closer he gets to power, the more morally bankrupt Kramer grows.
The moral emptiness of high society is also reflected in the degradation of relationships between men and women. In a hypermasculine society obsessed with image, women are treated as status symbols and objects of lust. Sherman might desire Maria, but he also revels in her beauty because it enhances his self-image. When he receives Maria at airport arrivals, he feels giddy that she walks with a “model-girl gait calculated to provoke maximum envy and resentment” (76). Sherman also admires his boss Gene Lopwitz for his fourth wife, a much younger woman of exceptional beauty. He feels Lopwitz has “taken what he wanted…a young and frisky animal” (71). Sherman reflects that no one cares what has happened to Lopwitz’s ex-wives since at Lopwitz’s level, “it [doesn’t] even matter” (72). Sherman’s observation shows that the presence of wealth and power bypasses the need for moral conduct. In the absence of moral norms, relationships turn brittle and temporary.
By Tom Wolfe
American Literature
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
Challenging Authority
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
National Book Critics Circle Award...
View Collection
Power
View Collection
Satire
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection